You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Igmar Palsenberg <ma...@jdimedia.nl> on 2005/02/01 11:56:24 UTC

Re: "Flaw" revisited (was: Bug? FSFS revision control)


> I plan to use Apache as the only method of serving the repository to my 
> users. I believe this means that the repository directory and the files 
> in it should be owned by the same user and group as the apache process, 
> right?

Yes.

> The concern is that if the repository is owned by the apache user, then 
> anything running on the web server could modify the repository (that 
> is, modify/corrupt/delete the repository files directly). We use Apache 
> as a regular web server already, serving web pages for dozens of 
> projects, some programmed by us and some not. What if one of these 
> projects has a security flaw that allows arbitrary command execution as 
> the apache user (such as the recent phpBB bug)?

Then all of your users are screwed :)

Solutions : Either use a different server setup for subversion, or use 
perchild-mpm. I haven't tested the latter myself.



	Igmar

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org