You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Igmar Palsenberg <ma...@jdimedia.nl> on 2005/02/01 11:56:24 UTC
Re: "Flaw" revisited (was: Bug? FSFS revision control)
> I plan to use Apache as the only method of serving the repository to my
> users. I believe this means that the repository directory and the files
> in it should be owned by the same user and group as the apache process,
> right?
Yes.
> The concern is that if the repository is owned by the apache user, then
> anything running on the web server could modify the repository (that
> is, modify/corrupt/delete the repository files directly). We use Apache
> as a regular web server already, serving web pages for dozens of
> projects, some programmed by us and some not. What if one of these
> projects has a security flaw that allows arbitrary command execution as
> the apache user (such as the recent phpBB bug)?
Then all of your users are screwed :)
Solutions : Either use a different server setup for subversion, or use
perchild-mpm. I haven't tested the latter myself.
Igmar
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org