You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Davide Giannella (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/16 11:42:03 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (OAK-6217) Document tricky statements

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Davide Giannella closed OAK-6217.
---------------------------------

bulk close 1.10.0

> Document tricky statements
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6217
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6217
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: query
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> There are some cases, specially if fulltext conditions and aggregation are used, where a query sometimes returns no results even thought with the right index it does return the results. This is a bit hard to understand, because it doesn't match the rule "indexes should only affect performance, not results". One such example is if a query uses one or the other index, but not both. Or if a query uses fulltext conditions on different nodes (parent and child). Examples:
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root/home//element(*, rep:User)
>   [jcr:contains(.,'Kerr*') 
>   and jcr:like(@rep:impersonators, '%ccibu%')]/profile
> /jcr:root/home//element(*, rep:User)
>   [jcr:contains(profile,'Kerr*') 
>   and jcr:like(@rep:impersonators, '%ccibu%')]/profile
> {noformat}
> Related is the usage of relative properties in indexes, excluded / included paths.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)