Re: Is Flink >1.14 really supported by the runners?

[Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz>]

Probably better for dev@ <ma...@beam.apache.org> (added).

  Jan

On 6/13/23 12:43, Edgar H wrote:
> Got you, thanks!
>
> Are there any plans on supporting 1.17 anytime soon too?
>
> El mar, 13 jun 2023, 12:27, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> escribió:
>
>     Hi Edgar,
>
>     the website seems to be mistakenly not updated when the support for
>     Flink versions was added. This should be fixed [1], the runner is
>     stable
>     on versions up to 1.16.
>
>     Regarding Flink Operator, I'm not 100% familiar with it, but given
>     that
>     Beam Pipeline is translated into standard Flink application, Beam
>     should
>     be able to run on the operator just like any other application.
>
>     Best,
>
>       Jan
>
>     [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/27115
>
>     On 6/13/23 12:10, Edgar H wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > I've been running Beam with Flink in 1.14 for quite some time
>     now but
>     > just seen in Maven that runners supporting 1.15 and 1.16 are
>     available
>     > to use, however no mention to them within the compatibility matrix.
>     >
>     > Are they stable enough to be used?
>     >
>     > And also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14538
>     seeing this
>     > issue and wondering, does Beam really need to support the operator
>     > usage or is it something not related to?
>     >
>     > Thanks!
>