You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> on 2008/07/23 17:43:01 UTC
do the test cases work for anyone else?
I've always had some tests failing on most boxes I try; I wasn't sure
if everyone else got those or if they do work on some platforms?
On OS X I get these failures
[junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.AsyncTest FAILED
[junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherFuncTest FAILED
On a linux box (an EC2 box) I get these failures
[junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientTest FAILED
[junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumTest FAILED
Maybe they all work on windows? :)
I tried adding an explicit forkmode="perTest" to the <junit> and I
still get the same results. Can anyone else get the tests to work on
linux or OS X?
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: do the test cases work for anyone else?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Here's the first issue with a patch...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-86
2008/7/23 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>:
> It's important to capture this type of information in jira.
>
> James Strachan wrote:
>>
>> FWIW I've ran the tests a few times; I think all these 4 tests have
>> timing failures in them. I've seen all of them fail on OS X at some
>> point. Sometimes only 2 will fail. On Linux I've seen just ClientTest
>> fail.
>>
>>
>> 2008/7/23 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>> I'm on ubuntu (hardy heron) and they work. Our CI machine has
>>> intermittent
>>> failures (solaris x86):
>>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/
>>>
>>> there's some timing issue, what you're seeing is probably related to:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-61
>>>
>>> Frankly tests and docs are both areas that ZooKeeper could use _a lot_ of
>>> care and feeding. Tests in particular could use some refactoring and a
>>> better implementation for launching/testing/stopping client/server tests.
>>>
>>> As you're able to reproduce the issue reliably would you like to take on
>>> 61?
>>> Feel free to assign to yourself if so.
>>
>> As a newbie on the project its hard enough grokking ZK itself and
>> attempting to contribute patches, but fixing bad test cases of ZK is
>> even harder :) I was hoping the folks who know ZK really well can fix
>> the tests they've written :). But I'll take a look and see if I can
>> see anything obvious I can do to help with my limited knowledge of the
>> history of the code and internals.
>>
>> How about we raise a JIRA for all tests that fail?
>>
>
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: do the test cases work for anyone else?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
It's important to capture this type of information in jira.
James Strachan wrote:
> FWIW I've ran the tests a few times; I think all these 4 tests have
> timing failures in them. I've seen all of them fail on OS X at some
> point. Sometimes only 2 will fail. On Linux I've seen just ClientTest
> fail.
>
>
> 2008/7/23 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>:
>> I'm on ubuntu (hardy heron) and they work. Our CI machine has intermittent
>> failures (solaris x86):
>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/
>>
>> there's some timing issue, what you're seeing is probably related to:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-61
>>
>> Frankly tests and docs are both areas that ZooKeeper could use _a lot_ of
>> care and feeding. Tests in particular could use some refactoring and a
>> better implementation for launching/testing/stopping client/server tests.
>>
>> As you're able to reproduce the issue reliably would you like to take on 61?
>> Feel free to assign to yourself if so.
>
> As a newbie on the project its hard enough grokking ZK itself and
> attempting to contribute patches, but fixing bad test cases of ZK is
> even harder :) I was hoping the folks who know ZK really well can fix
> the tests they've written :). But I'll take a look and see if I can
> see anything obvious I can do to help with my limited knowledge of the
> history of the code and internals.
>
> How about we raise a JIRA for all tests that fail?
>
Re: do the test cases work for anyone else?
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Makes sense. Feel free to do so.
mahadev
On 7/23/08 9:12 AM, "James Strachan" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW I've ran the tests a few times; I think all these 4 tests have
> timing failures in them. I've seen all of them fail on OS X at some
> point. Sometimes only 2 will fail. On Linux I've seen just ClientTest
> fail.
>
>
> 2008/7/23 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>:
>> I'm on ubuntu (hardy heron) and they work. Our CI machine has intermittent
>> failures (solaris x86):
>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/
>>
>> there's some timing issue, what you're seeing is probably related to:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-61
>>
>> Frankly tests and docs are both areas that ZooKeeper could use _a lot_ of
>> care and feeding. Tests in particular could use some refactoring and a
>> better implementation for launching/testing/stopping client/server tests.
>>
>> As you're able to reproduce the issue reliably would you like to take on 61?
>> Feel free to assign to yourself if so.
>
> As a newbie on the project its hard enough grokking ZK itself and
> attempting to contribute patches, but fixing bad test cases of ZK is
> even harder :) I was hoping the folks who know ZK really well can fix
> the tests they've written :). But I'll take a look and see if I can
> see anything obvious I can do to help with my limited knowledge of the
> history of the code and internals.
>
> How about we raise a JIRA for all tests that fail?
Re: do the test cases work for anyone else?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
FWIW I've ran the tests a few times; I think all these 4 tests have
timing failures in them. I've seen all of them fail on OS X at some
point. Sometimes only 2 will fail. On Linux I've seen just ClientTest
fail.
2008/7/23 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>:
> I'm on ubuntu (hardy heron) and they work. Our CI machine has intermittent
> failures (solaris x86):
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/
>
> there's some timing issue, what you're seeing is probably related to:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-61
>
> Frankly tests and docs are both areas that ZooKeeper could use _a lot_ of
> care and feeding. Tests in particular could use some refactoring and a
> better implementation for launching/testing/stopping client/server tests.
>
> As you're able to reproduce the issue reliably would you like to take on 61?
> Feel free to assign to yourself if so.
As a newbie on the project its hard enough grokking ZK itself and
attempting to contribute patches, but fixing bad test cases of ZK is
even harder :) I was hoping the folks who know ZK really well can fix
the tests they've written :). But I'll take a look and see if I can
see anything obvious I can do to help with my limited knowledge of the
history of the code and internals.
How about we raise a JIRA for all tests that fail?
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: do the test cases work for anyone else?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
I'm on ubuntu (hardy heron) and they work. Our CI machine has
intermittent failures (solaris x86):
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/
there's some timing issue, what you're seeing is probably related to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-61
Frankly tests and docs are both areas that ZooKeeper could use _a lot_
of care and feeding. Tests in particular could use some refactoring and
a better implementation for launching/testing/stopping client/server tests.
As you're able to reproduce the issue reliably would you like to take on
61? Feel free to assign to yourself if so.
Regards,
Patrick
James Strachan wrote:
> I've always had some tests failing on most boxes I try; I wasn't sure
> if everyone else got those or if they do work on some platforms?
>
> On OS X I get these failures
> [junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.AsyncTest FAILED
> [junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherFuncTest FAILED
>
> On a linux box (an EC2 box) I get these failures
>
> [junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientTest FAILED
> [junit] Test org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumTest FAILED
>
> Maybe they all work on windows? :)
>
> I tried adding an explicit forkmode="perTest" to the <junit> and I
> still get the same results. Can anyone else get the tests to work on
> linux or OS X?
>