Re: Package name for 3.0?

[Boris Kolpackov <bo...@codesynthesis.com>]

Hi Scott,

Scott Cantor <ca...@osu.edu> writes:

> Currently configure.ac uses xercesc, while the RPMs have always used
> xerces-c. For upgrade reasons, I would prefer that it stick with one
> convention.

It should be xerces-c plus the version should be 3.0.0, not 3.0.
Changing xercesc to xerces-c should be easy though changing 3.0
to 3.0.0 will require some adjustments elsewhere. I will make
these changes.

Thanks,
Boris


-- 
Boris Kolpackov, Code Synthesis Tools
Open source XML data binding for C++:   http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsd
Mobile/embedded validating XML parsing: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsde

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org

RE: Package name for 3.0?

[Scott Cantor <ca...@osu.edu>]

> It should be xerces-c plus the version should be 3.0.0, not 3.0.
> Changing xercesc to xerces-c should be easy though changing 3.0
> to 3.0.0 will require some adjustments elsewhere. I will make
> these changes.

I was going to ask about the 3.0.0 thing too, I'm after the lowest hanging
fruit right now. In general, that's fine with me. But keep in mind that
library versioning has nothing to do with package versioning. I assume you
know this, and that so.3.0.0 != Xerces 3.0.0 except by coincidence...

-- Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org