You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@taverna.apache.org by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> on 2015/07/14 16:58:27 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache Taverna
Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Please use this thread to discuss any issues arising over the proposed
release of Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating RC3 & Apache Taverna
Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3.
Cheers,
Ian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpSOTAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5hQUH/18pSJJJZawlshX9JrCwe3tD
T4dJ5Bo0xWegdvYPB0ZX5XmnrPzxaPy7Ff9FHyjhwZdKZDjy8JazhDgkiD0nHHG2
lxS93FmtxniwkfOS5Of8ecGg/ymERAEr/cZe2tv5TAHwbOrMqXN/QNOGFzzmlVBu
LbRLTa418wRaZ22uJuD1ZGiJrYVg//LsSwm9zMZvx5MoujQmP1iIh31gwcgwfFC1
L4GAjsMdI6ob0VGwATUN7csY9THCvCSJKZZZp/BXW9AdusAZMnBnEsXmj2EekCEt
Txs7qJ6xNmicTPpb015GmT/lKZ67WX+h7hgfugQcrUE+i7Cn05XRCn7wUYQL6SM=
=eGwt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
OK, I had a go - Andy - do you think you could you check if this is
how you meant?
I added full file-paths to what files are covered by which
license/notice - which cover the RAT exclusions in pom.xml
I left in NOTICE only those that require to be in NOTICE, basically
the Apache-licensed files.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/NOTICE
.. which is much shorter. Too short?
I moved all the Creative commons and W3C license stuff to LICENSE.
Their licenses do not require
attribution in particular in the NOTICE file.
I included the OASIS license text.
See bottom of
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/LICENSE#L207
On 15 July 2015 at 09:14, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> @Stian. If you get the licence/notice updates in then we can go for an
> RC4! At least I have now figured out how the release works! Should we
> wait until after GSoC to try again?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 14/07/15 19:54, Pierce, Marlon wrote:
>> I need to look but just from this email, I would consider it to be
>> a blocker. You want to get these things right.
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/15, 12:04 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <st...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Please use this thread to discuss any issues arising over the
>>>> proposed release of Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating RC3 &
>>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Ian!
>>>
>>> Beyond the fixed Unicode issue and now correct LICENSE.txt, I
>>> don't see that this RC includes the split between NOTICE and
>>> LICENSE as discussed earlier, hence my +0.5 instead of +1.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is probably my fault; I thought I had done this and might
>>> have given that impression - but it might be I had not checked it
>>> in from my laptop which had a disk failure last week.
>>>
>>> I am sorry for not getting this included in time for your
>>> Release Candidate.
>>>
>>>
>>> Personally I don't see this as a blocker for the release.. It is
>>> not ideal, but it should not be problematic to release the RC
>>> as-is.
>>>
>>> We should do another release of taverna-language in August after
>>> GSOC, to include Menaka's command line tool within the build -
>>> which would require more NOTICE/LICENSE updates, particularly if
>>> we are going to provide the shadowed binary JAR - so I think we
>>> should fix it then.
>>>
>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVphZ1AAoJEPK45GBX+Cy53vsIAI7SeujP79P5mjn5/FGrQVKV
> aLaspe8dqafeBhuKVuSj3R2fld5X9B15BRASwi7l9IqO1zQWKg9gPVyTyNPoTx7l
> upxIcc1PUJAdpxPdpcZyYbfNCx/ZjkiEfUDD3FeDLroN4mOfXdnbUklmrk6cyWzO
> 1VhDtwhcCnyeVxA6N41G+TxpzjFNx5XJkSFslyCwnlr4Yf2I5MzpNelslhGZw6dx
> LvlJHP6jBqabSV8DkvHZ79tziY5B2zq9CohlyvKOINTi6eJ8OZERPRIMbXHsULK9
> Q78pQBkwuc8GGwEwuLT61GokYbf2CGqkGELeNOR9ZTikABZWZTNIqK6ElH2NuSg=
> =W6Lr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Reading this again, I believe we do not need to include the PAV
ontology notice lines (Apache license) as it had no such NOTICE file
upstream, and the copyright is also stated within the file.
I'll try to find the the older ODFDOM distro upstream to see if it
included a NOTICE file or not - they also have copyright headers in
file which is why I added it to NOTICE. (it is also Apache-licensed)
Yes, it's embedded ODFDOM upstream -- this could in theory be adapted
from https://incubator.apache.org/odftoolkit/odfdom/ in the incubator,
but sadly it has a few custom patches that makes updating a bit
trickier. (Really it should be ripped out and replaced by the RO
Bundle API - that is the branch
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/tree/ucfpackage-robundle)
On 15 July 2015 at 19:39, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> extensively :-/
>
> On 15 July 2015 at 19:12, Pierce, Marlon <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
>> I am no wiser than http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html and
>> links. You have reviewed this?
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 7/15/15, 11:39 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>So I guess we need Marlon or someone else more used these legal issues
>>>than us to have a look at
>>>
>>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/NOTICE
>>>
>>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/LICENSE
>>>
>>>and let us know if they are ok. Anything else that we were concerned
>>>about?
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Ian
>>>
>>>
>>>On 15/07/15 16:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>> Right - check that the git repo now is finally OK legally (before
>>>> we make another RC!), and go straight for another RC4.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Martin's latest RO Bundle fixes (see various Jira emails) has
>>>> already been merged into master as well, so they would incidentally
>>>> also be included, which is good, but that is not the reason for why
>>>> we should drop RC3 - but to make sure the legal side is OK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for releasing Menaka's command line as a downloadable binary, I
>>>> think that could fit in an autumn release; it will take more
>>>> preparation time as we need to go through the legal stuff for its
>>>> embedded dependencies. (I think we might should help Menaka with
>>>> that)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 15 July 2015 at 15:59, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>>>> wrote: Hello
>>>>
>>>> I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been
>>>> updated in the repo then pull and create another release now.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
>>>>>>> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>>>>>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it
>>>>>>>> would loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to
>>>>>>>> include all the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpn7AAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5xBwH/jS9IHV/UkSs+fzvDq/oKT8G
>>>fc8r3rhYx1kc1gtE6ChSM4nT6nAPMD++OHsL7b8lqCe2xJ7w8/xiAH7j4Tt2ogOj
>>>EKpW5OnYS6J3W0XuRYIFepkqSaQiU+u5AbLCo8/pfo13EXKrZ0gqaorNgplPbR9N
>>>y7my7zCRP3k41emrWRl15CFjOv4oEnWtFY1Vhdcy5RqEqs7NfddKWQ+jxqY17Peb
>>>YOVNcLJuQBNDiN9Yy5bWQaZbgOYrqBVhgiUqEsitc6FY3Z4mJRs3yZxpG72Rx+tZ
>>>bTGoYeRHXWJLFFP2V/ZGNenE/SVydUoh0lS429QWJlOdDPzygZAdGkm5yR06+yo=
>>>=Q4vb
>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by "Pierce, Marlon" <ma...@iu.edu>.
So you decided to put the Oracle stuff in the NOTICE because it is third
party code directly in your code base? And the other licenses in LICENSE
are for dependencies?
On 7/15/15, 2:39 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>extensively :-/
>
>On 15 July 2015 at 19:12, Pierce, Marlon <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
>> I am no wiser than http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html and
>> links. You have reviewed this?
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 7/15/15, 11:39 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>So I guess we need Marlon or someone else more used these legal issues
>>>than us to have a look at
>>>
>>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/NOTICE
>>>
>>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/LICENSE
>>>
>>>and let us know if they are ok. Anything else that we were concerned
>>>about?
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Ian
>>>
>>>
>>>On 15/07/15 16:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>> Right - check that the git repo now is finally OK legally (before
>>>> we make another RC!), and go straight for another RC4.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Martin's latest RO Bundle fixes (see various Jira emails) has
>>>> already been merged into master as well, so they would incidentally
>>>> also be included, which is good, but that is not the reason for why
>>>> we should drop RC3 - but to make sure the legal side is OK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for releasing Menaka's command line as a downloadable binary, I
>>>> think that could fit in an autumn release; it will take more
>>>> preparation time as we need to go through the legal stuff for its
>>>> embedded dependencies. (I think we might should help Menaka with
>>>> that)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 15 July 2015 at 15:59, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>>>> wrote: Hello
>>>>
>>>> I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been
>>>> updated in the repo then pull and create another release now.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
>>>>>>> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>>>>>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it
>>>>>>>> would loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to
>>>>>>>> include all the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpn7AAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5xBwH/jS9IHV/UkSs+fzvDq/oKT8G
>>>fc8r3rhYx1kc1gtE6ChSM4nT6nAPMD++OHsL7b8lqCe2xJ7w8/xiAH7j4Tt2ogOj
>>>EKpW5OnYS6J3W0XuRYIFepkqSaQiU+u5AbLCo8/pfo13EXKrZ0gqaorNgplPbR9N
>>>y7my7zCRP3k41emrWRl15CFjOv4oEnWtFY1Vhdcy5RqEqs7NfddKWQ+jxqY17Peb
>>>YOVNcLJuQBNDiN9Yy5bWQaZbgOYrqBVhgiUqEsitc6FY3Z4mJRs3yZxpG72Rx+tZ
>>>bTGoYeRHXWJLFFP2V/ZGNenE/SVydUoh0lS429QWJlOdDPzygZAdGkm5yR06+yo=
>>>=Q4vb
>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Stian Soiland-Reyes
>Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
>http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
extensively :-/
On 15 July 2015 at 19:12, Pierce, Marlon <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> I am no wiser than http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html and
> links. You have reviewed this?
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 7/15/15, 11:39 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>So I guess we need Marlon or someone else more used these legal issues
>>than us to have a look at
>>
>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/NOTICE
>>
>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/LICENSE
>>
>>and let us know if they are ok. Anything else that we were concerned
>>about?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>
>>On 15/07/15 16:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> Right - check that the git repo now is finally OK legally (before
>>> we make another RC!), and go straight for another RC4.
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin's latest RO Bundle fixes (see various Jira emails) has
>>> already been merged into master as well, so they would incidentally
>>> also be included, which is good, but that is not the reason for why
>>> we should drop RC3 - but to make sure the legal side is OK.
>>>
>>>
>>> As for releasing Menaka's command line as a downloadable binary, I
>>> think that could fit in an autumn release; it will take more
>>> preparation time as we need to go through the legal stuff for its
>>> embedded dependencies. (I think we might should help Menaka with
>>> that)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 July 2015 at 15:59, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>>> wrote: Hello
>>>
>>> I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been
>>> updated in the repo then pull and create another release now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>>>>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it
>>>>>>> would loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to
>>>>>>> include all the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1
>>
>>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpn7AAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5xBwH/jS9IHV/UkSs+fzvDq/oKT8G
>>fc8r3rhYx1kc1gtE6ChSM4nT6nAPMD++OHsL7b8lqCe2xJ7w8/xiAH7j4Tt2ogOj
>>EKpW5OnYS6J3W0XuRYIFepkqSaQiU+u5AbLCo8/pfo13EXKrZ0gqaorNgplPbR9N
>>y7my7zCRP3k41emrWRl15CFjOv4oEnWtFY1Vhdcy5RqEqs7NfddKWQ+jxqY17Peb
>>YOVNcLJuQBNDiN9Yy5bWQaZbgOYrqBVhgiUqEsitc6FY3Z4mJRs3yZxpG72Rx+tZ
>>bTGoYeRHXWJLFFP2V/ZGNenE/SVydUoh0lS429QWJlOdDPzygZAdGkm5yR06+yo=
>>=Q4vb
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by "Pierce, Marlon" <ma...@iu.edu>.
I am no wiser than http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html and
links. You have reviewed this?
Marlon
On 7/15/15, 11:39 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hello,
>
>So I guess we need Marlon or someone else more used these legal issues
>than us to have a look at
>
>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/NOTICE
>
>https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/LICENSE
>
>and let us know if they are ok. Anything else that we were concerned
>about?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ian
>
>
>On 15/07/15 16:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>> Right - check that the git repo now is finally OK legally (before
>> we make another RC!), and go straight for another RC4.
>>
>>
>> Martin's latest RO Bundle fixes (see various Jira emails) has
>> already been merged into master as well, so they would incidentally
>> also be included, which is good, but that is not the reason for why
>> we should drop RC3 - but to make sure the legal side is OK.
>>
>>
>> As for releasing Menaka's command line as a downloadable binary, I
>> think that could fit in an autumn release; it will take more
>> preparation time as we need to go through the legal stuff for its
>> embedded dependencies. (I think we might should help Menaka with
>> that)
>>
>>
>> On 15 July 2015 at 15:59, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>> wrote: Hello
>>
>> I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been
>> updated in the repo then pull and create another release now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
>>>>> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>>>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it
>>>>>> would loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to
>>>>>> include all the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1
>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpn7AAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5xBwH/jS9IHV/UkSs+fzvDq/oKT8G
>fc8r3rhYx1kc1gtE6ChSM4nT6nAPMD++OHsL7b8lqCe2xJ7w8/xiAH7j4Tt2ogOj
>EKpW5OnYS6J3W0XuRYIFepkqSaQiU+u5AbLCo8/pfo13EXKrZ0gqaorNgplPbR9N
>y7my7zCRP3k41emrWRl15CFjOv4oEnWtFY1Vhdcy5RqEqs7NfddKWQ+jxqY17Peb
>YOVNcLJuQBNDiN9Yy5bWQaZbgOYrqBVhgiUqEsitc6FY3Z4mJRs3yZxpG72Rx+tZ
>bTGoYeRHXWJLFFP2V/ZGNenE/SVydUoh0lS429QWJlOdDPzygZAdGkm5yR06+yo=
>=Q4vb
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
So I guess we need Marlon or someone else more used these legal issues
than us to have a look at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/NOTICE
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/LICENSE
and let us know if they are ok. Anything else that we were concerned
about?
Cheers,
Ian
On 15/07/15 16:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Right - check that the git repo now is finally OK legally (before
> we make another RC!), and go straight for another RC4.
>
>
> Martin's latest RO Bundle fixes (see various Jira emails) has
> already been merged into master as well, so they would incidentally
> also be included, which is good, but that is not the reason for why
> we should drop RC3 - but to make sure the legal side is OK.
>
>
> As for releasing Menaka's command line as a downloadable binary, I
> think that could fit in an autumn release; it will take more
> preparation time as we need to go through the legal stuff for its
> embedded dependencies. (I think we might should help Menaka with
> that)
>
>
> On 15 July 2015 at 15:59, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
> wrote: Hello
>
> I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been
> updated in the repo then pull and create another release now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
>>>> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it
>>>>> would loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to
>>>>> include all the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>>>>
>>>> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpn7AAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5xBwH/jS9IHV/UkSs+fzvDq/oKT8G
fc8r3rhYx1kc1gtE6ChSM4nT6nAPMD++OHsL7b8lqCe2xJ7w8/xiAH7j4Tt2ogOj
EKpW5OnYS6J3W0XuRYIFepkqSaQiU+u5AbLCo8/pfo13EXKrZ0gqaorNgplPbR9N
y7my7zCRP3k41emrWRl15CFjOv4oEnWtFY1Vhdcy5RqEqs7NfddKWQ+jxqY17Peb
YOVNcLJuQBNDiN9Yy5bWQaZbgOYrqBVhgiUqEsitc6FY3Z4mJRs3yZxpG72Rx+tZ
bTGoYeRHXWJLFFP2V/ZGNenE/SVydUoh0lS429QWJlOdDPzygZAdGkm5yR06+yo=
=Q4vb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Right - check that the git repo now is finally OK legally (before we
make another RC!), and go straight for another RC4.
Martin's latest RO Bundle fixes (see various Jira emails) has already
been merged into master as well, so they would incidentally also be
included, which is good, but that is not the reason for why we should
drop RC3 - but to make sure the legal side is OK.
As for releasing Menaka's command line as a downloadable binary, I
think that could fit in an autumn release; it will take more
preparation time as we need to go through the legal stuff for its
embedded dependencies. (I think we might should help Menaka with that)
On 15 July 2015 at 15:59, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
>
> I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been updated
> in the repo then pull and create another release now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
>> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it would
>>> loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to include all
>>> the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>>
>> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>>
>> Alan
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpnVFAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5KToIALjaczm0hw3wNxL08aUBGDIZ
> lVrhXYNTZ/iuv8jesYI9TCMdt0XxaQ+qX/9DqqBE9F+YXAyKMryaaj4fQ04qP3a+
> RVn969KO4COoVBFUHekqu60953BfMqhTjhutj/HbOZ9FUk/N1wAWkF2w2OsKb9Xd
> gFD0ONnQRE2m5uaO6YJFAjo3HQ2RiThMh3p1sx/EZ4BaMh9cirpSF5WUsAx/vk4k
> GUVgeI5byywFKcpJHsz78F/6td/qydB7x/QiJv1C48TxnHJKpjial2VKiSU8G/oX
> gzuSmvp5H6aR1srp8C2O79LoXG/kOt5NnrqQlsiJfayCJGYmKrorcEXcburlmLo=
> =fvOh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello
I think he means check that the licence, notice etc have been updated
in the repo then pull and create another release now.
Cheers,
Ian
On 15/07/15 15:44, alaninmcr wrote:
> On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it would
>> loose the momentum now.. it would also be great to include all
>> the fixes Martin Scharm also has included.
>
> I am not clear what you are suggesting.
>
> Alan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpnVFAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5KToIALjaczm0hw3wNxL08aUBGDIZ
lVrhXYNTZ/iuv8jesYI9TCMdt0XxaQ+qX/9DqqBE9F+YXAyKMryaaj4fQ04qP3a+
RVn969KO4COoVBFUHekqu60953BfMqhTjhutj/HbOZ9FUk/N1wAWkF2w2OsKb9Xd
gFD0ONnQRE2m5uaO6YJFAjo3HQ2RiThMh3p1sx/EZ4BaMh9cirpSF5WUsAx/vk4k
GUVgeI5byywFKcpJHsz78F/6td/qydB7x/QiJv1C48TxnHJKpjial2VKiSU8G/oX
gzuSmvp5H6aR1srp8C2O79LoXG/kOt5NnrqQlsiJfayCJGYmKrorcEXcburlmLo=
=fvOh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 15/07/2015 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it would loose
> the momentum now.. it would also be great to include all the fixes
> Martin Scharm also has included.
I am not clear what you are suggesting.
Alan
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
I don't think we should need to wait for GSOC to end as it would loose
the momentum now.. it would also be great to include all the fixes
Martin Scharm also has included.
On 15 July 2015 at 09:14, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> @Stian. If you get the licence/notice updates in then we can go for an
> RC4! At least I have now figured out how the release works! Should we
> wait until after GSoC to try again?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 14/07/15 19:54, Pierce, Marlon wrote:
>> I need to look but just from this email, I would consider it to be
>> a blocker. You want to get these things right.
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/15, 12:04 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <st...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Please use this thread to discuss any issues arising over the
>>>> proposed release of Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating RC3 &
>>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Ian!
>>>
>>> Beyond the fixed Unicode issue and now correct LICENSE.txt, I
>>> don't see that this RC includes the split between NOTICE and
>>> LICENSE as discussed earlier, hence my +0.5 instead of +1.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is probably my fault; I thought I had done this and might
>>> have given that impression - but it might be I had not checked it
>>> in from my laptop which had a disk failure last week.
>>>
>>> I am sorry for not getting this included in time for your
>>> Release Candidate.
>>>
>>>
>>> Personally I don't see this as a blocker for the release.. It is
>>> not ideal, but it should not be problematic to release the RC
>>> as-is.
>>>
>>> We should do another release of taverna-language in August after
>>> GSOC, to include Menaka's command line tool within the build -
>>> which would require more NOTICE/LICENSE updates, particularly if
>>> we are going to provide the shadowed binary JAR - so I think we
>>> should fix it then.
>>>
>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVphZ1AAoJEPK45GBX+Cy53vsIAI7SeujP79P5mjn5/FGrQVKV
> aLaspe8dqafeBhuKVuSj3R2fld5X9B15BRASwi7l9IqO1zQWKg9gPVyTyNPoTx7l
> upxIcc1PUJAdpxPdpcZyYbfNCx/ZjkiEfUDD3FeDLroN4mOfXdnbUklmrk6cyWzO
> 1VhDtwhcCnyeVxA6N41G+TxpzjFNx5XJkSFslyCwnlr4Yf2I5MzpNelslhGZw6dx
> LvlJHP6jBqabSV8DkvHZ79tziY5B2zq9CohlyvKOINTi6eJ8OZERPRIMbXHsULK9
> Q78pQBkwuc8GGwEwuLT61GokYbf2CGqkGELeNOR9ZTikABZWZTNIqK6ElH2NuSg=
> =W6Lr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
@Stian. If you get the licence/notice updates in then we can go for an
RC4! At least I have now figured out how the release works! Should we
wait until after GSoC to try again?
Cheers,
Ian
On 14/07/15 19:54, Pierce, Marlon wrote:
> I need to look but just from this email, I would consider it to be
> a blocker. You want to get these things right.
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 7/14/15, 12:04 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <st...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>> Please use this thread to discuss any issues arising over the
>>> proposed release of Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating RC3 &
>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3.
>>
>> Thanks, Ian!
>>
>> Beyond the fixed Unicode issue and now correct LICENSE.txt, I
>> don't see that this RC includes the split between NOTICE and
>> LICENSE as discussed earlier, hence my +0.5 instead of +1.
>>
>>
>> This is probably my fault; I thought I had done this and might
>> have given that impression - but it might be I had not checked it
>> in from my laptop which had a disk failure last week.
>>
>> I am sorry for not getting this included in time for your
>> Release Candidate.
>>
>>
>> Personally I don't see this as a blocker for the release.. It is
>> not ideal, but it should not be problematic to release the RC
>> as-is.
>>
>> We should do another release of taverna-language in August after
>> GSOC, to include Menaka's command line tool within the build -
>> which would require more NOTICE/LICENSE updates, particularly if
>> we are going to provide the shadowed binary JAR - so I think we
>> should fix it then.
>>
>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVphZ1AAoJEPK45GBX+Cy53vsIAI7SeujP79P5mjn5/FGrQVKV
aLaspe8dqafeBhuKVuSj3R2fld5X9B15BRASwi7l9IqO1zQWKg9gPVyTyNPoTx7l
upxIcc1PUJAdpxPdpcZyYbfNCx/ZjkiEfUDD3FeDLroN4mOfXdnbUklmrk6cyWzO
1VhDtwhcCnyeVxA6N41G+TxpzjFNx5XJkSFslyCwnlr4Yf2I5MzpNelslhGZw6dx
LvlJHP6jBqabSV8DkvHZ79tziY5B2zq9CohlyvKOINTi6eJ8OZERPRIMbXHsULK9
Q78pQBkwuc8GGwEwuLT61GokYbf2CGqkGELeNOR9ZTikABZWZTNIqK6ElH2NuSg=
=W6Lr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by "Pierce, Marlon" <ma...@iu.edu>.
I need to look but just from this email, I would consider it to be a
blocker. You want to get these things right.
Marlon
On 7/14/15, 12:04 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please use this thread to discuss any issues arising over the proposed
>> release of Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating RC3 & Apache Taverna
>> Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3.
>
>Thanks, Ian!
>
>Beyond the fixed Unicode issue and now correct LICENSE.txt, I don't
>see that this RC includes the split between NOTICE and LICENSE as
>discussed earlier, hence my +0.5 instead of +1.
>
>
>This is probably my fault; I thought I had done this and might have
>given that impression - but it might be I had not checked it in from
>my laptop which had a disk failure last week.
>
>I am sorry for not getting this included in time for your Release
>Candidate.
>
>
>Personally I don't see this as a blocker for the release.. It is not
>ideal, but it should not be problematic to release the RC as-is.
>
>We should do another release of taverna-language in August after GSOC,
>to include Menaka's command line tool within the build - which would
>require more NOTICE/LICENSE updates, particularly if we are going to
>provide the shadowed binary JAR - so I think we should fix it then.
>
>--
>Stian Soiland-Reyes
>Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
>http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Alan Williams <al...@googlemail.com>.
Stian,
You said there were misleading dependencies. What are they?
Alan
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC3 Apache
Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
> Please use this thread to discuss any issues arising over the proposed
> release of Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating RC3 & Apache Taverna
> Language 0.15.0-incubating RC3.
Thanks, Ian!
Beyond the fixed Unicode issue and now correct LICENSE.txt, I don't
see that this RC includes the split between NOTICE and LICENSE as
discussed earlier, hence my +0.5 instead of +1.
This is probably my fault; I thought I had done this and might have
given that impression - but it might be I had not checked it in from
my laptop which had a disk failure last week.
I am sorry for not getting this included in time for your Release Candidate.
Personally I don't see this as a blocker for the release.. It is not
ideal, but it should not be problematic to release the RC as-is.
We should do another release of taverna-language in August after GSOC,
to include Menaka's command line tool within the build - which would
require more NOTICE/LICENSE updates, particularly if we are going to
provide the shadowed binary JAR - so I think we should fix it then.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718