You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to droids-dev@incubator.apache.org by no...@apache.org on 2011/05/01 14:00:07 UTC
Incubator PMC/Board report for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Dear Droids Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Thurs, 19 May 2011, 10 am Pacific. The report
for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC
requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow
sufficient time for review.
Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and
subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you
should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
Thanks,
The Apache Incubator PMC
Submitting your Report
----------------------
Your report should contain the following:
* Your project name
* A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project
or necessarily of its field
* A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
graduation.
* Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
* How has the community developed since the last report
* How has the project developed since the last report.
This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2011
Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is
created from a template.
Mentors
-------
Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
Incubator PMC
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 23:42 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 23:08, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> > On 05/12/2011 05:06 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
> >>>
> >>> The sponsor is Lucene which imjplies grduation to there. Is this no
> >>> longer
> >>> the case?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Since then Lucene has discouraged sub-projects, and has moved
> >> subprojects to their own TLP.
> >>
> >> My understanding is that Apache would like to see more TLPs rather
> >> then umbrella projects.
> >>
> >> ryan
> >
> > Yeah, that's been my impression from the board as well.
>
> This is absolutely correct.
>
> However, was Droids proposed as a sub-project or as a potential core
> contribution?
Actually Droids started with two potential sponsors (HT and lucene). It
never had been clear who is leading.
However this project has no strong relations to neither and the
community as well has no strong roots in neither.
IMO the most logical is that Droids becomes TLP.
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 12/05/2011 23:08, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 05:06 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>>>
>>> The sponsor is Lucene which imjplies grduation to there. Is this no
>>> longer
>>> the case?
>>>
>>
>> Since then Lucene has discouraged sub-projects, and has moved
>> subprojects to their own TLP.
>>
>> My understanding is that Apache would like to see more TLPs rather
>> then umbrella projects.
>>
>> ryan
>
> Yeah, that's been my impression from the board as well.
This is absolutely correct.
However, was Droids proposed as a sub-project or as a potential core
contribution?
Ross
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
On 05/12/2011 05:06 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>>
>> The sponsor is Lucene which imjplies grduation to there. Is this no longer
>> the case?
>>
>
> Since then Lucene has discouraged sub-projects, and has moved
> subprojects to their own TLP.
>
> My understanding is that Apache would like to see more TLPs rather
> then umbrella projects.
>
> ryan
Yeah, that's been my impression from the board as well.
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for
May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Ryan McKinley <ry...@gmail.com>.
>>>
>>> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>
> The sponsor is Lucene which imjplies grduation to there. Is this no longer
> the case?
>
Since then Lucene has discouraged sub-projects, and has moved
subprojects to their own TLP.
My understanding is that Apache would like to see more TLPs rather
then umbrella projects.
ryan
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
On 05/12/2011 04:55 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 22:16, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>
> The licence headers need to be checked (does Droids use RAT?) again this
> needs to be done as part of the release.
>
We've used RAT in the past. The checker in the parent pom has a bug
making it painful to use. Looking at things again, we do seem to be shy
on a few of the files.
> Verifying your release is the responsibility of your mentors and the
> IPMC. This is one reason why release candidates need to be made
> available for verification before you call a release vote.
>
>> I don't see anything under out tree. Is it the page under the
>> Incubator's tree? If so, we'll have to have Ross commit it for us after
>> we've put together all of the updates and provide a diff.
>
> It doesn't have to be me, see http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
>
> Ross
Thanks. I've been looking, but wasn't able to come across that
particular page.
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 22:55 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 22:16, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> > On 05/12/2011 03:04 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> >> I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
> >> points I may have forgotten.
> >>
> >> BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
> >> * IP clearance
> >>
> >> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>
> The sponsor is Lucene which imjplies grduation to there. Is this no
> longer the case?
>
> Personally I think talk of graduation is premature. There can be no
> doubt that the project has been revived recently. However, I'm not sure
> that I could claim there is a viable community yet.
I see your point however regarding the community I see that there are
various people driving now the project and I see a momentum. I think we
should now try to surf this wave and get Droids out to the world as
official part of the ASF. I do not believe that the incubator state is
helping to get a bigger community and we have only two committer that
had not been prior ASF committer to other projects. That tells me that
the community knows the ASF way.
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 12/05/2011 22:16, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 03:04 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
>> points I may have forgotten.
>>
>> BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
>> * IP clearance
>>
>> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
The sponsor is Lucene which imjplies grduation to there. Is this no
longer the case?
Personally I think talk of graduation is premature. There can be no
doubt that the project has been revived recently. However, I'm not sure
that I could claim there is a viable community yet.
> What do we need to do for IP clearance? Anything that didn't originate
> in the Apache SVN needs to go through clearance. However, if this
> originated in Labs, does the base code need anything? Does anyone know
> of any similar projects we could look at to see what their IP clearance
> document looked like?
All code in SVN has been developed in the ASF by people with CLAs on
file, so there should be no problem there.
The libraries need to be verified which will happen in the release
validation.
The licence headers need to be checked (does Droids use RAT?) again this
needs to be done as part of the release.
Verifying your release is the responsibility of your mentors and the
IPMC. This is one reason why release candidates need to be made
available for verification before you call a release vote.
> I don't see anything under out tree. Is it the page under the
> Incubator's tree? If so, we'll have to have Ross commit it for us after
> we've put together all of the updates and provide a diff.
It doesn't have to be me, see http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Ross
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
On 05/12/2011 03:04 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
> points I may have forgotten.
>
> BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
> * IP clearance
>
> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>
> salu2
>
What do we need to do for IP clearance? Anything that didn't originate
in the Apache SVN needs to go through clearance. However, if this
originated in Labs, does the base code need anything? Does anyone know
of any similar projects we could look at to see what their IP clearance
document looked like?
We probably should update our project status page. Where is that stored?
I don't see anything under out tree. Is it the page under the
Incubator's tree? If so, we'll have to have Ross commit it for us after
we've put together all of the updates and provide a diff.
Looking at the clutch status, we're missing a distribution directory, a
KEYS file in the distribution directory, and a release in the
distribution directory. These are all things I will work towards once a
release has been approved.
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for
May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com>.
Thanks, my insight on incubation is know clearer.
I'm motivated for the hackathon. I can move for a barcamp but an online one
has clearly the advantage to be cheaper and simpler to organise :-).
Everyone else interested?
On 12 May 2011 11:23, Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:40 +0200, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
> > I don't have experience at all with graduation but, in my opinion, if
> droids
> > community becomes stronger and more constant, the graduation will
> > automatically happened after a while.
>
> Actually the graduation has to be driven by us. The incubator is not
> suitable to host long time projects. It is more to adapt the community
> to the apache way of doing this. However this never had been an issue
> for droids since it even started in labs, so from the beginning adopt
> the asf way have not been an issue.
>
> The graduation will as well attract more devs and possible committers.
>
> > Personally, I think the necessary
> > steps to increase the activity around Droids are:
> >
> > - having a release process
> > - improving the documentation
> > - cleaning the codebase
> >
>
> Besides the last point that can be done by anyone interested in the
> project, trying to say you do not have to have commit rights to do the
> task. The last point I agree is the most critical and hardest point to
> achieve.
>
> > We all have a difficulties to find time to perform these actions and it's
> > time consuming to describe a problem, wait two weeks for having few
> > feedbacks and then correcting the issue. Furthermore, cleaning the
> codebase
> > is difficult because it imply to move out of the trunk parts of the
> project
> > on which people worked hard.
> >
> > If there is a will to improve Droids I think we should block one or two
> days
> > to perform these steps together.
>
> We may even try to organize a barCamp and we hack together a cleaner
> version. Would that be from interest, or should we do a droid online
> hackathon?
>
> salu2
>
> >
> > That's only my opinion but I hope it can helps. Best regards,
> >
> > Bertil
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12 May 2011 10:04, Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
> > > points I may have forgotten.
> > >
> > > BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
> > > * IP clearance
> > >
> > > How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
> > >
> > > salu2
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:00 +0000, no-reply@apache.org wrote:
> > > > Dear Droids Developers,
> > > >
> > > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > > Incubator PMC.
> > > > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
> > > quarterly
> > > > board report.
> > > >
> > > > The board meeting is scheduled for Thurs, 19 May 2011, 10 am
> Pacific.
> > > The report
> > > > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
> > > Incubator PMC
> > > > requires your report to be submitted one week before the board
> meeting,
> > > to allow
> > > > sufficient time for review.
> > > >
> > > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
> > > PMC, and
> > > > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very
> latest
> > > you
> > > > should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > The Apache Incubator PMC
> > > >
> > > > Submitting your Report
> > > > ----------------------
> > > >
> > > > Your report should contain the following:
> > > >
> > > > * Your project name
> > > > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the
> > > project
> > > > or necessarily of its field
> > > > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > > towards
> > > > graduation.
> > > > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to
> be
> > > aware of
> > > > * How has the community developed since the last report
> > > > * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > > >
> > > > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > > >
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2011
> > > >
> > > > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this
> > > page is
> > > > created from a template.
> > > >
> > > > Mentors
> > > > -------
> > > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> on
> > > the
> > > > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following
> the
> > > > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the
> Incubator
> > > PMC.
> > > >
> > > > Incubator PMC
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> > > codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
> > > <consulting, training and solutions>
> > > http://www.codebusters.es/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
> <consulting, training and solutions>
> http://www.codebusters.es/
>
>
--
Bertil Chapuis
Agimem Sàrl
http://www.agimem.com
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report
for May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:40 +0200, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
> I don't have experience at all with graduation but, in my opinion, if droids
> community becomes stronger and more constant, the graduation will
> automatically happened after a while.
Actually the graduation has to be driven by us. The incubator is not
suitable to host long time projects. It is more to adapt the community
to the apache way of doing this. However this never had been an issue
for droids since it even started in labs, so from the beginning adopt
the asf way have not been an issue.
The graduation will as well attract more devs and possible committers.
> Personally, I think the necessary
> steps to increase the activity around Droids are:
>
> - having a release process
> - improving the documentation
> - cleaning the codebase
>
Besides the last point that can be done by anyone interested in the
project, trying to say you do not have to have commit rights to do the
task. The last point I agree is the most critical and hardest point to
achieve.
> We all have a difficulties to find time to perform these actions and it's
> time consuming to describe a problem, wait two weeks for having few
> feedbacks and then correcting the issue. Furthermore, cleaning the codebase
> is difficult because it imply to move out of the trunk parts of the project
> on which people worked hard.
>
> If there is a will to improve Droids I think we should block one or two days
> to perform these steps together.
We may even try to organize a barCamp and we hack together a cleaner
version. Would that be from interest, or should we do a droid online
hackathon?
salu2
>
> That's only my opinion but I hope it can helps. Best regards,
>
> Bertil
>
>
>
> On 12 May 2011 10:04, Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
> > points I may have forgotten.
> >
> > BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
> > * IP clearance
> >
> > How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
> >
> > salu2
> >
> > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:00 +0000, no-reply@apache.org wrote:
> > > Dear Droids Developers,
> > >
> > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC.
> > > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
> > quarterly
> > > board report.
> > >
> > > The board meeting is scheduled for Thurs, 19 May 2011, 10 am Pacific.
> > The report
> > > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
> > Incubator PMC
> > > requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting,
> > to allow
> > > sufficient time for review.
> > >
> > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
> > PMC, and
> > > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest
> > you
> > > should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > The Apache Incubator PMC
> > >
> > > Submitting your Report
> > > ----------------------
> > >
> > > Your report should contain the following:
> > >
> > > * Your project name
> > > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the
> > project
> > > or necessarily of its field
> > > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards
> > > graduation.
> > > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > > * How has the community developed since the last report
> > > * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > >
> > > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2011
> > >
> > > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this
> > page is
> > > created from a template.
> > >
> > > Mentors
> > > -------
> > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> > the
> > > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
> > > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator
> > PMC.
> > >
> > > Incubator PMC
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> > codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
> > <consulting, training and solutions>
> > http://www.codebusters.es/
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for
May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com>.
But sure IP clearance is necessary :-).
On 12 May 2011 10:40, Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com> wrote:
> I don't have experience at all with graduation but, in my opinion, if
> droids community becomes stronger and more constant, the graduation will
> automatically happened after a while. Personally, I think the necessary
> steps to increase the activity around Droids are:
>
> - having a release process
> - improving the documentation
> - cleaning the codebase
>
> We all have a difficulties to find time to perform these actions and it's
> time consuming to describe a problem, wait two weeks for having few
> feedbacks and then correcting the issue. Furthermore, cleaning the codebase
> is difficult because it imply to move out of the trunk parts of the project
> on which people worked hard.
>
> If there is a will to improve Droids I think we should block one or two
> days to perform these steps together.
>
> That's only my opinion but I hope it can helps. Best regards,
>
> Bertil
>
>
>
> On 12 May 2011 10:04, Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
>> points I may have forgotten.
>>
>> BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
>> * IP clearance
>>
>> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>>
>> salu2
>>
>> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:00 +0000, no-reply@apache.org wrote:
>> > Dear Droids Developers,
>> >
>> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>> Incubator PMC.
>> > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
>> quarterly
>> > board report.
>> >
>> > The board meeting is scheduled for Thurs, 19 May 2011, 10 am Pacific.
>> The report
>> > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
>> Incubator PMC
>> > requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting,
>> to allow
>> > sufficient time for review.
>> >
>> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
>> PMC, and
>> > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest
>> you
>> > should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > The Apache Incubator PMC
>> >
>> > Submitting your Report
>> > ----------------------
>> >
>> > Your report should contain the following:
>> >
>> > * Your project name
>> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>> the project
>> > or necessarily of its field
>> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>> towards
>> > graduation.
>> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>> aware of
>> > * How has the community developed since the last report
>> > * How has the project developed since the last report.
>> >
>> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2011
>> >
>> > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this
>> page is
>> > created from a template.
>> >
>> > Mentors
>> > -------
>> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>> the
>> > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following
>> the
>> > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the
>> Incubator PMC.
>> >
>> > Incubator PMC
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
>> codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
>> <consulting, training and solutions>
>> http://www.codebusters.es/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bertil Chapuis
> Agimem Sàrl
> http://www.agimem.com
>
>
--
Bertil Chapuis
Agimem Sàrl
http://www.agimem.com
Re: Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for
May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com>.
I don't have experience at all with graduation but, in my opinion, if droids
community becomes stronger and more constant, the graduation will
automatically happened after a while. Personally, I think the necessary
steps to increase the activity around Droids are:
- having a release process
- improving the documentation
- cleaning the codebase
We all have a difficulties to find time to perform these actions and it's
time consuming to describe a problem, wait two weeks for having few
feedbacks and then correcting the issue. Furthermore, cleaning the codebase
is difficult because it imply to move out of the trunk parts of the project
on which people worked hard.
If there is a will to improve Droids I think we should block one or two days
to perform these steps together.
That's only my opinion but I hope it can helps. Best regards,
Bertil
On 12 May 2011 10:04, Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
> points I may have forgotten.
>
> BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
> * IP clearance
>
> How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
>
> salu2
>
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:00 +0000, no-reply@apache.org wrote:
> > Dear Droids Developers,
> >
> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC.
> > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
> quarterly
> > board report.
> >
> > The board meeting is scheduled for Thurs, 19 May 2011, 10 am Pacific.
> The report
> > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
> Incubator PMC
> > requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting,
> to allow
> > sufficient time for review.
> >
> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
> PMC, and
> > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest
> you
> > should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Incubator PMC
> >
> > Submitting your Report
> > ----------------------
> >
> > Your report should contain the following:
> >
> > * Your project name
> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the
> project
> > or necessarily of its field
> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards
> > graduation.
> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> > * How has the community developed since the last report
> > * How has the project developed since the last report.
> >
> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2011
> >
> > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this
> page is
> > created from a template.
> >
> > Mentors
> > -------
> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the
> > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
> > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator
> PMC.
> >
> > Incubator PMC
> >
>
> --
> Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
> <consulting, training and solutions>
> http://www.codebusters.es/
>
>
--
Bertil Chapuis
Agimem Sàrl
http://www.agimem.com
Graduation after release? (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for
May 2011 (droids-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com>.
I just added a draft, please feel free to review and add if you see
points I may have forgotten.
BTW we have only one point open before we can graduate:
* IP clearance
How does we feel to graduate? I guess we would graduate to our TLP?
salu2
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:00 +0000, no-reply@apache.org wrote:
> Dear Droids Developers,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC.
> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
> board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Thurs, 19 May 2011, 10 am Pacific. The report
> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC
> requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow
> sufficient time for review.
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and
> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you
> should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
> ----------------------
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> * Your project name
> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project
> or necessarily of its field
> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation.
> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
> * How has the community developed since the last report
> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2011
>
> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is
> created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> -------
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/