You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xerces.apache.org by "Arnold, Curt" <Cu...@hyprotech.com> on 2000/02/03 03:31:11 UTC
Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev
I think that it would still be good to have a home for "generic" Xerces discussion. Otherwise, if you have something that is generic, you would probably cross-post it and many people would get it
twice. Or you would have a very useful discussion on something in Xerces-J and Xerces-C people would not see it.
So, how about keeping xerces-dev, but creating new mailing lists xerces-c-dev and xerces-j-dev?
Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev
Posted by tw...@sauria.com.
I hate to say it but I've stopped reading general. People are using
general as "help". At one point we discussed separate user and developer
mailing lists. I think that proper naming helps direct traffic to the right place.
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Pogue <mp...@apache.org>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev
> We do have the "General" list already...
>
> Mike
>
> "Arnold, Curt" wrote:
> >
> > I think that it would still be good to have a home for "generic" Xerces discussion. Otherwise, if you have something that is
generic, you would probably cross-post it and many people would get it
> > twice. Or you would have a very useful discussion on something in Xerces-J and Xerces-C people would not see it.
> >
> > So, how about keeping xerces-dev, but creating new mailing lists xerces-c-dev and xerces-j-dev?
>
Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev
Posted by Mike Pogue <mp...@apache.org>.
We do have the "General" list already...
Mike
"Arnold, Curt" wrote:
>
> I think that it would still be good to have a home for "generic" Xerces discussion. Otherwise, if you have something that is generic, you would probably cross-post it and many people would get it
> twice. Or you would have a very useful discussion on something in Xerces-J and Xerces-C people would not see it.
>
> So, how about keeping xerces-dev, but creating new mailing lists xerces-c-dev and xerces-j-dev?
Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev
Posted by Shinji Kikuchi <ki...@psdl.tmg.nec.co.jp>.
I would like to support below, if possible, though I have still
remained as a subscriber, or a "code reader".
currentNumber++ ;
currentNumber++ ; // For my other address at home.
"Arnold, Curt" wrote:
> I think that it would still be good to have a home for "generic" Xerces
> discussion. Otherwise, if you have something that is generic, you would
> probably cross-post it and many people would get it twice.
> Or you would have a very useful discussion on something in Xerces-J
> and Xerces-C people would not see it.
>So, how about keeping xerces-dev, but creating new mailing lists
> xerces-c-dev and xerces-j-dev?
Shinji Kikuchi@NEC Corporation
Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev
Posted by Eric Ulevik <ea...@fast.fujitsu.com.au>.
From: Arnold, Curt <Cu...@hyprotech.com>
> you would have a very useful discussion on something in Xerces-J and
Xerces-C people would not see it.
> So, how about keeping xerces-dev, but creating new mailing lists
xerces-c-dev and xerces-j-dev?
I like thing the way they are. But two or three mailing lists doesn't bother
me.