You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> on 2017/09/14 18:55:51 UTC
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be
FlexJS?
Is this a “No” Binding vote?
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't
>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>> No (binding)
>>>
>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>>> discussed.
>>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
Posted by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net>.
Thank you and I agree so long as FlexJS is not on the second ballot.
I recommend a preference list.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap on what it should be.
>
> As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the second vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote until the first vote finishes is beneficial.
>
> I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week.
>
> To be official:
> No (binding)
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> Is this a “No” Binding vote?
>>
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't
>>>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>>>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>>>>> discussed.
>>>>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
NO (binding)
Carlos definitely helped me with the decision. He triggers me with MDL and
it was worth it, so I believe in his web design abilities and branding
super powers! :)
+1 for open vote with list of already proposed names, voters could propose
something outside list. At the end we can count everything.
Thanks,
Piotr
2017-09-14 21:21 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap
> on what it should be.
>
> As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can
> proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the
> second vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote
> until the first vote finishes is beneficial.
>
> I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week.
>
> To be official:
> No (binding)
>
> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > Is this a “No” Binding vote?
> >
> >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I
> don't
> >>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> No (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> >>>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> >>>>> discussed.
> >>>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00
> UT.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap on what it should be.
As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the second vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote until the first vote finishes is beneficial.
I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week.
To be official:
No (binding)
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Is this a “No” Binding vote?
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't
>>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>>>> discussed.
>>>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>