You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2011/09/27 09:52:55 UTC
svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Author: rpluem
Date: Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011
New Revision: 1176254
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176254&view=rev
Log:
* Add comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1176254&r1=1176253&r2=1176254&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011
@@ -159,6 +159,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1175980
2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/byterange0-.txt
+1: jim
+ rpluem asks: Shouldn't it be
+
+ if (sum_lengths > clength) {
+
+ instead of
+
+ if (sum_lengths = clength) {
+
+ like in trunk as otherwise we still send a 200 for 0-?
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
RE: svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Posted by "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ru...@vodafone.com>.
Ok. Looks like the cache issue fixed itself now.
Regards
Rüdiger
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" [mailto:ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 27. September 2011 14:04
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: cvs@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 27. September 2011 13:21
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Cc: cvs@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1176254 -
> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> >
> > Fixed... Thx!
>
> Hm. http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/byterange0-.txt
> still looks the same.
> Or is this some kind of caching issue on my side?
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
RE: svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Posted by "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 27. September 2011 13:21
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: cvs@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Fixed... Thx!
Hm. http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/byterange0-.txt still looks the same.
Or is this some kind of caching issue on my side?
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Fixed… Thx!
On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:52 AM, rpluem@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011
> New Revision: 1176254
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176254&view=rev
> Log:
> * Add comment
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1176254&r1=1176253&r2=1176254&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011
> @@ -159,6 +159,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1175980
> 2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/byterange0-.txt
> +1: jim
> + rpluem asks: Shouldn't it be
> +
> + if (sum_lengths > clength) {
> +
> + instead of
> +
> + if (sum_lengths = clength) {
> +
> + like in trunk as otherwise we still send a 200 for 0-?
>
> PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
>
>
>