You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to builds@apache.org by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> on 2010/07/13 11:01:12 UTC
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot? Can you change
the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Krugler [mailto:kkrugler_lists@transpac.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 12:34 AM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: tika-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi Gavin,
>
> The change we'd really like to make for Tika is to have two build
> commands:
>
> mvn clean install
> mvn site
>
> as this works around a known bug in Maven's handling of dependencies
> with the 'site' target.
>
> Don't know if buildbot supports that, but if so that would be most
> useful.
Hi Ken, sorry for delay, I missed this first time around, now done.
Let me know if there is anything else.
Gav...
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Ken
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
> >> To: builds@apache.org
> >> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
> >> Buildbot.
> >>> Full details are available at:
> >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
> >>
> >> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
> >
> > Yep, I don't remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
> > chose for testing buildbot with.
> >
> >
> >> Can you change
> >> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
> >> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
> >
> > Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having
> > builds
> > in the first place.
> >
> > I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
> >
> > fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file
> > if they
> > wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
> >
> > Anyway, should all be good now.
> >
> > For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika
> > builds
> > continue
> > on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
> > covering,
> > or if you don't see any point and would like it removed. It matters
> > not to
> > me
> > whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any
> > combo of.
> > Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you
> > guys.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gav...
> >
> >>
> >> BR,
> >>
> >> Jukka Zitting
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Ken Krugler
> +1 530-210-6378
> http://bixolabs.com
> e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g
>
>
>
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by Ken Krugler <kk...@transpac.com>.
Hi Gavin,
The change we'd really like to make for Tika is to have two build
commands:
mvn clean install
mvn site
as this works around a known bug in Maven's handling of dependencies
with the 'site' target.
Don't know if buildbot supports that, but if so that would be most
useful.
Thanks,
-- Ken
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
>> To: builds@apache.org
>> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
>> Buildbot.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
>>
>> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
>
> Yep, I don’t remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
> chose for testing buildbot with.
>
>
>> Can you change
>> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
>> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
>
> Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having
> builds
> in the first place.
>
> I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
>
> fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file
> if they
> wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
>
> Anyway, should all be good now.
>
> For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika
> builds
> continue
> on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
> covering,
> or if you don’t see any point and would like it removed. It matters
> not to
> me
> whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any
> combo of.
> Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you
> guys.
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav...
>
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>
>
--------------------------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://bixolabs.com
e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1...
On 7/14/10 2:27 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
> continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features
> you want covering, or if you don't see any point and would like it removed.
We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
[1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/
BR,
Jukka Zitting
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
>> We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
>> nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
>> needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
>> like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
>> to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
>
> What is there to maintain exactly ? On the odd occasion like this one,
> someone lets me know what needs changing and I change it.
Agreed, it's not much effort. My point is just that someone should at
least be aware of the build and how to get it adjusted if or when
needed. Now we had a case where nobody on our team knew about the
build when Buildbot started sending failure notifications to dev@tika.
That's what I want to avoid going forward.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
>> We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
>> nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
>> needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
>> like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
>> to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
>
> What is there to maintain exactly ? On the odd occasion like this one,
> someone lets me know what needs changing and I change it.
Agreed, it's not much effort. My point is just that someone should at
least be aware of the build and how to get it adjusted if or when
needed. Now we had a case where nobody on our team knew about the
build when Buildbot started sending failure notifications to dev@tika.
That's what I want to avoid going forward.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 7:28 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> > For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika
> builds
> > continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features
> > you want covering, or if you don't see any point and would like it
> removed.
>
> We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
> nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
> needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
> like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
> to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
What is there to maintain exactly ? On the odd occasion like this one,
someone
lets me know what needs changing and I change it. Unlike Hudson, there is
not
the confusion of 150+ accounts doing whatever they like on whatever slaves,
its
just me. Projects are welcome to tweak their config file any time they like
from
with svn, other than that, there really isn't anything for anyone to do.
Gav...
>
> [1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1...
On 7/14/10 2:27 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
> continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features
> you want covering, or if you don't see any point and would like it removed.
We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
[1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/
BR,
Jukka Zitting
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 7:28 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> > For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika
> builds
> > continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features
> > you want covering, or if you don't see any point and would like it
> removed.
>
> We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
> nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
> needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
> like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
> to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
What is there to maintain exactly ? On the odd occasion like this one,
someone
lets me know what needs changing and I change it. Unlike Hudson, there is
not
the confusion of 150+ accounts doing whatever they like on whatever slaves,
its
just me. Projects are welcome to tweak their config file any time they like
from
with svn, other than that, there really isn't anything for anyone to do.
Gav...
>
> [1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
> continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features
> you want covering, or if you don’t see any point and would like it removed.
We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
[1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
> continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features
> you want covering, or if you don’t see any point and would like it removed.
We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's
nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it
needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion
like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers
to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it.
[1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by Ken Krugler <kk...@transpac.com>.
Hi Gavin,
The change we'd really like to make for Tika is to have two build
commands:
mvn clean install
mvn site
as this works around a known bug in Maven's handling of dependencies
with the 'site' target.
Don't know if buildbot supports that, but if so that would be most
useful.
Thanks,
-- Ken
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
>> To: builds@apache.org
>> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
>> Buildbot.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
>>
>> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
>
> Yep, I don’t remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
> chose for testing buildbot with.
>
>
>> Can you change
>> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
>> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
>
> Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having
> builds
> in the first place.
>
> I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
>
> fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file
> if they
> wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
>
> Anyway, should all be good now.
>
> For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika
> builds
> continue
> on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
> covering,
> or if you don’t see any point and would like it removed. It matters
> not to
> me
> whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any
> combo of.
> Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you
> guys.
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav...
>
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>
>
--------------------------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://bixolabs.com
e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hi Guys,
+1, I like Buildbot, doesn't really matter to me whether we use that or Hudson or anything below, just that the person in Tika-ville that monitors/maintains our config for it knows how to communicate with builds@ or infra@ to fix little things like this, or to alleviate having to contact you guys to do it and learning how to do it ourselves.
Thanks for the help, Gav and for showing us how to get in touch with builds@ Jukka...
Cheers,
Chris
On 7/13/10 5:13 AM, "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
> Buildbot.
> > Full details are available at:
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
>
> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
Yep, I don't remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
chose for testing buildbot with.
> Can you change
> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having builds
in the first place.
I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file if they
wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
Anyway, should all be good now.
For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
continue
on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
covering,
or if you don't see any point and would like it removed. It matters not to
me
whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any combo of.
Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you guys.
Thanks
Gav...
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hi Guys,
+1, I like Buildbot, doesn't really matter to me whether we use that or Hudson or anything below, just that the person in Tika-ville that monitors/maintains our config for it knows how to communicate with builds@ or infra@ to fix little things like this, or to alleviate having to contact you guys to do it and learning how to do it ourselves.
Thanks for the help, Gav and for showing us how to get in touch with builds@ Jukka...
Cheers,
Chris
On 7/13/10 5:13 AM, "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
> Buildbot.
> > Full details are available at:
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
>
> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
Yep, I don't remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
chose for testing buildbot with.
> Can you change
> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having builds
in the first place.
I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file if they
wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
Anyway, should all be good now.
For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
continue
on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
covering,
or if you don't see any point and would like it removed. It matters not to
me
whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any combo of.
Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you guys.
Thanks
Gav...
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
> Buildbot.
> > Full details are available at:
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
>
> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
Yep, I dont remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
chose for testing buildbot with.
> Can you change
> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having builds
in the first place.
I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file if they
wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
Anyway, should all be good now.
For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
continue
on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
covering,
or if you dont see any point and would like it removed. It matters not to
me
whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any combo of.
Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you guys.
Thanks
Gav...
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Posted by "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
> Buildbot.
> > Full details are available at:
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
>
> Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
Yep, I dont remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
chose for testing buildbot with.
> Can you change
> the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
> install", or disable the failure notifications to dev@tika?
Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having builds
in the first place.
I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file if they
wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
Anyway, should all be good now.
For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds
continue
on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
covering,
or if you dont see any point and would like it removed. It matters not to
me
whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any combo of.
Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you guys.
Thanks
Gav...
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting