You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> on 2010/04/26 17:28:00 UTC
Test failure in trunk node-impl
On fresh update I'm seeing the following in the node-impl tests.
testNodeFactoryProperties(org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImplTestCase) Ti
me elapsed: 0.047 sec <<< FAILURE!
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[]> but was:<[default]>
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImplTestCase.testNodeFactoryProp
erties(NodeImplTestCase.java:198)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(Framework
Method.java:44)
I've noticed changes to default domain names but I haven't caught up
with where the info comes from. Should this test be expecting
"default" instead of ""? Am looking but if anyone knows please shout.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: Test failure in trunk node-impl
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Fixed, sorry had missed this update from the other commit.
...ant
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On fresh update I'm seeing the following in the node-impl tests.
>
> testNodeFactoryProperties(org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImplTestCase) Ti
> me elapsed: 0.047 sec <<< FAILURE!
> org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[]> but was:<[default]>
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImplTestCase.testNodeFactoryProp
> erties(NodeImplTestCase.java:198)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
> java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> sorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(Framework
> Method.java:44)
>
> I've noticed changes to default domain names but I haven't caught up
> with where the info comes from. Should this test be expecting
> "default" instead of ""? Am looking but if anyone knows please shout.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>
Re: Test failure in trunk node-impl
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On fresh update I'm seeing the following in the node-impl tests.
>
> testNodeFactoryProperties(org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImplTestCase) Ti
> me elapsed: 0.047 sec <<< FAILURE!
> org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[]> but was:<[default]>
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImplTestCase.testNodeFactoryProp
> erties(NodeImplTestCase.java:198)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
> java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> sorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(Framework
> Method.java:44)
>
> I've noticed changes to default domain names but I haven't caught up
> with where the info comes from. Should this test be expecting
> "default" instead of ""? Am looking but if anyone knows please shout.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>
k, thanks ant.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com