You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by gdeconto <ge...@topproducer.com> on 2010/02/10 17:12:03 UTC
question/suggestion for Solr-236 patch
I have been able to apply and use the solr-236 patch (field collapsing)
successfully.
Very, very cool and powerful.
My one comment/concern is that the collapseCount and aggregate function
values in the collapse_counts list only represent the collapsed documents
(ie the ones that are not shown in results).
Are there any plans to include the non-collapsed (?) document in the
collapseCount and aggregate function values (ie so that it includes ALL
documents, not just the collapsed ones)? Possibly via some parameter like
collapse.includeAll?
I think this would be a great addition to the collapse code (and solr
functionality) via what I would think is a small change.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/question-suggestion-for-Solr-236-patch-tp27533695p27533695.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: question/suggestion for Solr-236 patch
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
Gerald,
Your suggestion will likely get lost in the piles of solr-user email. You should add your comments to JIRA-236 directly.
Otis
-----
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
----- Original Message ----
> From: gdeconto <ge...@topproducer.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 11:12:03 AM
> Subject: question/suggestion for Solr-236 patch
>
>
> I have been able to apply and use the solr-236 patch (field collapsing)
> successfully.
>
> Very, very cool and powerful.
>
> My one comment/concern is that the collapseCount and aggregate function
> values in the collapse_counts list only represent the collapsed documents
> (ie the ones that are not shown in results).
>
> Are there any plans to include the non-collapsed (?) document in the
> collapseCount and aggregate function values (ie so that it includes ALL
> documents, not just the collapsed ones)? Possibly via some parameter like
> collapse.includeAll?
>
> I think this would be a great addition to the collapse code (and solr
> functionality) via what I would think is a small change.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/question-suggestion-for-Solr-236-patch-tp27533695p27533695.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: question/suggestion for Solr-236 patch
Posted by gdeconto <ge...@topproducer.com>.
Joe Calderon-2 wrote:
>
> you can do that very easily yourself in a post processing step after
> you receive the solr response
>
true (and am already doing so).
was thinking that having this done as part of the field collapsing code, it
might be faster than doing so via post processing (ie no need to navigate
the xml results for two different values for each collapsed set, adding the
numbers to get the total, etc)
it was just a suggestion. field collapsing is a great feature.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/question-suggestion-for-Solr-236-patch-tp27533695p27535153.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: question/suggestion for Solr-236 patch
Posted by Joe Calderon <ca...@gmail.com>.
you can do that very easily yourself in a post processing step after
you receive the solr response
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:12 AM, gdeconto
<ge...@topproducer.com> wrote:
>
> I have been able to apply and use the solr-236 patch (field collapsing)
> successfully.
>
> Very, very cool and powerful.
>
> My one comment/concern is that the collapseCount and aggregate function
> values in the collapse_counts list only represent the collapsed documents
> (ie the ones that are not shown in results).
>
> Are there any plans to include the non-collapsed (?) document in the
> collapseCount and aggregate function values (ie so that it includes ALL
> documents, not just the collapsed ones)? Possibly via some parameter like
> collapse.includeAll?
>
> I think this would be a great addition to the collapse code (and solr
> functionality) via what I would think is a small change.
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/question-suggestion-for-Solr-236-patch-tp27533695p27533695.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>