svn commit: r938062 - in /websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk: cgi-bin/ content/ content/why/why_compliance.html

[bu...@apache.org]

Author: buildbot
Date: Wed Jan 28 15:52:38 2015
New Revision: 938062

Log:
Staging update by buildbot for ooo-site

Modified:
    websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/cgi-bin/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/content/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/content/why/why_compliance.html

Propchange: websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/cgi-bin/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Wed Jan 28 15:52:38 2015
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1655287
+1655368

Propchange: websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Wed Jan 28 15:52:38 2015
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1655287
+1655368

Modified: websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/content/why/why_compliance.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/content/why/why_compliance.html (original)
+++ websites/staging/ooo-site/trunk/content/why/why_compliance.html Wed Jan 28 15:52:38 2015
@@ -49,13 +49,14 @@ for their proprietary product public and
 and more worries.  This is the increased cost of compliance when copyleft software is brought into an organization.  This is not necessarily a bad thing.  It is just the reality of 
 using open source software under these licenses, and must be weighed in considered as one cost-driver among many.</p>
 <h2 id="the-apache-advantage">The Apache Advantage</h2>
-<p>However, not all open source licenses are copyleft license.  Not all of them have that viral quality that radically increases the risk for an organization.  A subset of open source 
+<p>However, not all open source licenses are copyleft license.  A subset of open source 
 licenses, generally called "permissive" licenses, are much more friendly for corporate use.  These licenses include the MIT and BSD licenses, as well as the 
 <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0">Apache Software License 2.0</a> that we use for Apache OpenOffice.</p>
 <p>Like other open source licenses, the Apache License explicitly allows you to copy and redistribute the covered product, without any license fees or royalties.  But because it is a
 permissive license, it also allows you to prepare and distribute derivative products, without requiring you to make your own source code public.  So both BSA and SFLC/FSF risks
 are eliminated, and the cost, to your business, of license compliance is greatly reduced.</p>
-<p><em>Views expressed in this page are not necessarily endorsed by the Apache Software Foundation.</em></p>
+<p><em>The Apache Software Foundation does not take a position, recommend or advise the use or non-use 
+of any particular software license or family of licenses.</em></p>
   </div>
 <!--#include virtual="/footer.html" -->
 </body>