[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3188) Is the Warning/Error raised correct when SCDL interface callback config doesn't match component type dervied from component

["Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737529#action_12737529 ] 

Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3188:
-------------------------------------

ASM80012 I think says that if a callback appears on a service or reference in the component type then if you specified an interface in the SCDL forthat service or reference it too must have a callback stated. 

This means that the otest needs fixing as ASM_8006 is testing that the callback interfaces are compatible not that they are both present. 

> Is the Warning/Error raised correct when SCDL interface callback config doesn't match component type dervied from component
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3188
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3188
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Simon Laws
>
> Looking at ASM_8006 TestComposite61.composite (file is in General_Java)
>    <component name="TestComposite61Component1">
>                <implementation.java class="org.oasisopen.sca.test.service9Impl"/>
>        <service name="Service9">
>                <interface.java interface="org.oasisopen.sca.test.Service9"/>
>        </service>
>        <property name="serviceName" source="$serviceName"/>
>    </component>
> The SCDL service description only describes a forward interface but
> the implementation describes a callback. We raise an error in this
> case.
> SEVERE: Component service interface incompatible with implementation
> service interface: Component = TestComposite61Component1 Service =
> Service9
> Is that correct and we need to get the test fixed or should we just be
> raising a warning in this case? It seems to me that if you are going
> to go to the trouble of including an interface element in the SCDL
> then it should match what the interface says (if this is true we need
> to turn the Warning that is raised for references in this case into
> Errors).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.