You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/07 03:04:54 UTC

[jira] Closed: (TAP5-266) In a conflict between a render phase annotation and the naming convention, the explicit annotation should win

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Howard M. Lewis Ship closed TAP5-266.
-------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 5.2.0

> In a conflict between a render phase annotation and the naming convention, the explicit annotation should win
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-266
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-266
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.15
>            Reporter: Hugo Palma
>            Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> If i have a method like this:
> @AfterRender
> void beginRender()
> {
> }
> it actually gets executed twice. Once during AfterRender and once during BeginRender. Although i agree that is bad coding it can cause some confusion and make it hard to diagnose.
> In my opinion there should be either an error thrown by Tapestry in this situation or it should just ignore the method name when a render phase annotation is present.
> Also, i didn't try if this also happens for component events.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.