You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chemistry.apache.org by Jens Hübel <jh...@opentext.com> on 2010/10/05 09:27:08 UTC
Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
HI Chemistry,
the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our distribution and being able to simply download the final application would simplify things a bit.
Comments?
By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter) name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ... there must be something better...
Jens
RE: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by "Klevenz, Stephan" <st...@sap.com>.
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Müller [mailto:florian.mueller@alfresco.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010 14:07
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Here is a proposal for a new name: CMIS Workbench
WDYT?
Florian
On 05/10/2010 10:10, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
> Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
> having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
> now.
>
> Florent
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
> <fl...@alfresco.com> wrote:
>> I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is enough
>> interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code resides. :)
>>
>> We could also make the Web Start version available from the OpenCMIS web
>> site if this helps to get hold of it.
>>
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
>>>
>>> HI Chemistry,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it
>>> has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder
>>> if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our
>>> distribution and being able to simply download the final application would
>>> simplify things a bit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter)
>>> name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ...
>>> there must be something better...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jens
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by Gabriele Columbro <co...@gmail.com>.
Hey guys,
I'm happy with this as long as you guys are, meaning: adding the CMIS
Workfbench to trunk means aligning it to a (potentially) slower
release process then if it would be alone.
On the other hand it will be part of a build which was already proved
to be working for the ASF legal requirements.
Ah, and +1 for the new name :)
Ciao,
Gab
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:25 PM, David Caruana wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5 Oct 2010, at 13:07, Florian Müller wrote:
>
>> Here is a proposal for a new name: CMIS Workbench
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>> On 05/10/2010 10:10, Florent Guillaume wrote:
>>> Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
>>> Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
>>> having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
>>> now.
>>>
>>> Florent
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
>>> <fl...@alfresco.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is
>>>> enough
>>>> interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code
>>>> resides. :)
>>>>
>>>> We could also make the Web Start version available from the
>>>> OpenCMIS web
>>>> site if this helps to get hold of it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Florian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> HI Chemistry,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here.
>>>>> I think it
>>>>> has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and
>>>>> so I wonder
>>>>> if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this
>>>>> part of our
>>>>> distribution and being able to simply download the final
>>>>> application would
>>>>> simplify things a bit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and
>>>>> shorter)
>>>>> name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied"
>>>>> Chemistry or ...
>>>>> there must be something better...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jens
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by David Caruana <da...@alfresco.com>.
+1
On 5 Oct 2010, at 13:07, Florian Müller wrote:
> Here is a proposal for a new name: CMIS Workbench
>
> WDYT?
>
>
> Florian
>
>
> On 05/10/2010 10:10, Florent Guillaume wrote:
>> Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
>> Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
>> having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
>> now.
>>
>> Florent
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
>> <fl...@alfresco.com> wrote:
>>> I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is enough
>>> interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code resides. :)
>>>
>>> We could also make the Web Start version available from the OpenCMIS web
>>> site if this helps to get hold of it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Florian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HI Chemistry,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it
>>>> has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder
>>>> if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our
>>>> distribution and being able to simply download the final application would
>>>> simplify things a bit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter)
>>>> name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ...
>>>> there must be something better...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jens
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
RE: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by Jens Hübel <jh...@opentext.com>.
I like it... especially in conjunction with the new groovy shell :-)
+1
Jens
-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Müller [mailto:florian.mueller@alfresco.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010 14:07
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Here is a proposal for a new name: CMIS Workbench
WDYT?
Florian
On 05/10/2010 10:10, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
> Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
> having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
> now.
>
> Florent
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
> <fl...@alfresco.com> wrote:
>> I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is enough
>> interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code resides. :)
>>
>> We could also make the Web Start version available from the OpenCMIS web
>> site if this helps to get hold of it.
>>
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
>>>
>>> HI Chemistry,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it
>>> has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder
>>> if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our
>>> distribution and being able to simply download the final application would
>>> simplify things a bit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter)
>>> name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ...
>>> there must be something better...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jens
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by Florian Müller <fl...@alfresco.com>.
Here is a proposal for a new name: CMIS Workbench
WDYT?
Florian
On 05/10/2010 10:10, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
> Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
> having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
> now.
>
> Florent
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
> <fl...@alfresco.com> wrote:
>> I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is enough
>> interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code resides. :)
>>
>> We could also make the Web Start version available from the OpenCMIS web
>> site if this helps to get hold of it.
>>
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
>>>
>>> HI Chemistry,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it
>>> has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder
>>> if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our
>>> distribution and being able to simply download the final application would
>>> simplify things a bit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter)
>>> name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ...
>>> there must be something better...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jens
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by Florent Guillaume <fg...@nuxeo.com>.
Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
now.
Florent
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
<fl...@alfresco.com> wrote:
> I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is enough
> interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code resides. :)
>
> We could also make the Web Start version available from the OpenCMIS web
> site if this helps to get hold of it.
>
>
> Florian
>
>
>
> On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
>>
>> HI Chemistry,
>>
>>
>>
>> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it
>> has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder
>> if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our
>> distribution and being able to simply download the final application would
>> simplify things a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>>
>>
>> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter)
>> name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ...
>> there must be something better...
>>
>>
>>
>> Jens
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: Moving cmis swing client to opencmis trunk?
Posted by Florian Müller <fl...@alfresco.com>.
I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is enough
interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code resides. :)
We could also make the Web Start version available from the OpenCMIS web
site if this helps to get hold of it.
Florian
On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
> HI Chemistry,
>
>
>
> the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here. I think it has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and so I wonder if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this part of our distribution and being able to simply download the final application would simplify things a bit.
>
>
>
> Comments?
>
>
>
> By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and shorter) name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied" Chemistry or ... there must be something better...
>
>
>
> Jens
>
>
>
>