You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> on 2008/06/08 01:26:07 UTC
Re: ant version support
It has been a few since we chatted about this. Is there anything holding
back formal push to Ant 1.7.0? Last time I checked it was only DRLVM's build
that had any issues with Ant 1.7.0, so that build will begin to not work on
1.6.5.
I'd like to put a version check in the scripts eventually, just to make it
obvious, but that can be discussed further.
-Nathan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Nathan Beyer <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Stepan Mishura
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/31/08, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > If there is enough support, we can add something like this to the
> > > top-level scripts to give notice -
> > >
> > > <target name="ant-version-check" description="ant version check">
> > > <fail message="You must use Ant 1.7.0">
> > > <condition>
> > > <not>
> > > <contains string="${ant.version}" substring="1.7.0"/>
> > > </not>
> > > </condition>
> > > </fail>
> > > </target>
> > >
> >
> > Our BTI scripts was not tested with v1.7. So I'm 100% not sure that
> > moving to the new ANT's version will be smooth. Also currently I'm
> > refactoring the scripts and need some to test them with ANT 1.7. Is
> > it possible to wait with the change and let me to complete refactoring
> > and testing with 1.7? (I do hope to complete refactoring this week,
> > and for testing I need ~ 1-2 days). Does this work for you?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
>
> Sure, that's fine. Let me know when you're ready. I'll go ahead and
> start updating doc in preparation.
>
> -Nathan
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Nathan
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > There seem to be all sorts of quirks between Ant v1.6.5 and Ant
> > > > v1.7.0. The most recent I just ran into was the DRLVM cunit tests
> > > > failing because of the use of 'refid' instead of 'id' in the
> > > > 'includepath' element [1].
> > > >
> > > > Since v1.7 has been out for quite a while now and most unix and
> linux
> > > > variants are shipping that version as the default, I'd like to
> suggest
> > > > that we move to v1.7 as the officially supported version. This
> would
> > > > essentially be updating all doc (web site, readmes, etc) and
> perhaps a
> > > > minor code pause to facilitate the switch.
> > > >
> > > > thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > -Nathan
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=416920&aid=1626443&group_id=36177
> > > >
> > >
> >
>