You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> on 2004/04/16 18:12:38 UTC
Merging r9212 and r9231
This is a Windows specific build system change. That apparently is only
useful for VC7. So far only josander has voted for it. I'm not sure
how many other committers have VC7 or feel comfortable reviewing this
change. Any objections to merging this with just josander's vote?
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Merging r9212 and r9231
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Monday 19 April 2004 21.45, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:49:44AM +0200, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> > It's very important _if_ we want to have a working installer setup
> > in the wc_1.0.x-branch.
> >
> > I will do what it takes to make a Windows Installer Distro anyway,
> > but I think it's quite meaningless to have installer code in the
> > wc_1.0.x-branch if it's not in sync with the people who makes
> > binaries.
>
> Okay 1.0.2 is out including this change.
Thanks, and congrats! :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Merging r9212 and r9231
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:49:44AM +0200, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> It's very important _if_ we want to have a working installer setup in the
> wc_1.0.x-branch.
>
> I will do what it takes to make a Windows Installer Distro anyway, but
> I think it's quite meaningless to have installer code in the
> wc_1.0.x-branch if it's not in sync with the people who makes binaries.
Okay 1.0.2 is out including this change.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Merging r9212 and r9231
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Monday 19 April 2004 08.58, Ben Reser wrote:
[...]
>
> We still haven't officially posted a release yet. If you think this is
> important enough I'll merge this change and cut a new release.
It's very important _if_ we want to have a working installer setup in the
wc_1.0.x-branch.
I will do what it takes to make a Windows Installer Distro anyway, but
I think it's quite meaningless to have installer code in the
wc_1.0.x-branch if it's not in sync with the people who makes binaries.
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Merging r9212 and r9231
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:14:59AM +0200, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> Well, it was no "objections merging this with just josander's vote" so
> you could merge it with your own +0 :-)
>
> You can say +0 and say that you like the consept. Then it can be merged.
> Here is why you like the consept:
Somehow I missed this was only a change to the win32 packages stuff...
> If Sussman or Sander makes the binaries (using VC7 and without debug
> symbol files as in 1.0.1), then the installer in wc_1.0.x-branch is
> useless without merging (as it was last time).
> This is not all, VC6 and VC7 ships with diffrent runtime files and the
> installer have to deal with this too. So, please, merge it, the current
> code in wc_1.0.x-branch is for VC6 only!
>
>
> In order to deliver a Windows Setup for 1.0.1, I had to ignore the
> wc_1.0.x-branch (the Windows Installer part of it), making it pretty
> meaningless to use energy on wc_1.0.x-branch at all.
We still haven't officially posted a release yet. If you think this is
important enough I'll merge this change and cut a new release.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Merging r9212 and r9231
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Saturday 17 April 2004 00.17, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 11:12:38AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> > This is a Windows specific build system change. That apparently is only
> > useful for VC7. So far only josander has voted for it. I'm not sure
> > how many other committers have VC7 or feel comfortable reviewing this
> > change. Any objections to merging this with just josander's vote?
>
> No response. Punted until 1.0.3.
Well, it was no "objections merging this with just josander's vote" so
you could merge it with your own +0 :-)
You can say +0 and say that you like the consept. Then it can be merged.
Here is why you like the consept:
If Sussman or Sander makes the binaries (using VC7 and without debug
symbol files as in 1.0.1), then the installer in wc_1.0.x-branch is
useless without merging (as it was last time).
This is not all, VC6 and VC7 ships with diffrent runtime files and the
installer have to deal with this too. So, please, merge it, the current
code in wc_1.0.x-branch is for VC6 only!
In order to deliver a Windows Setup for 1.0.1, I had to ignore the
wc_1.0.x-branch (the Windows Installer part of it), making it pretty
meaningless to use energy on wc_1.0.x-branch at all.
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Merging r9212 and r9231
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 11:12:38AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> This is a Windows specific build system change. That apparently is only
> useful for VC7. So far only josander has voted for it. I'm not sure
> how many other committers have VC7 or feel comfortable reviewing this
> change. Any objections to merging this with just josander's vote?
No response. Punted until 1.0.3.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org