You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@logging.apache.org by bo...@apache.org on 2011/09/20 14:29:18 UTC
svn commit: r1173113 - /logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml
Author: bodewig
Date: Tue Sep 20 12:29:18 2011
New Revision: 1173113
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173113&view=rev
Log:
re-wording suggested by Roy Chastain
Modified:
logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml
Modified: logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml?rev=1173113&r1=1173112&r2=1173113&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml (original)
+++ logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml Tue Sep 20 12:29:18 2011
@@ -694,8 +694,10 @@ public class FastLogger
doesn't lock the file at all but synchronizes
using a system wide Mutex. This will only work
if all processes cooperate (and use the same
- locking model) and has also be paid for by a
- loss in performance.
+ locking model). The acquisition and release of a
+ Mutex for every log entry to be written will
+ result in a loss of performance, but the Mutex
+ is preferable to the use of MinimalLock.
</p>
<p>
If you use <span