You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2009/12/08 08:56:01 UTC
[VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using
the maven-release-plugin.
This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
See the jira issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Many thanks
david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1
Jason and I also ran the jaspic tck (which is separate from the javaee
tck). After a little reconfiguration the servlet profile tests all
pass.
I'd like to call the vote soon, if you would like to vote please do so
soon.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
> +1 from me. I built the server and then ran the full tck
> successfully.
>
> ~Jason Warner
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of
> problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess
> they're not, so here's my +1 too.
>
> Rick
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
> Here's my +1.
> I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
>
> --kevan
>
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using
> the maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> >
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024
> >
>
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> >
>
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
> something plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me. I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully.
~Jason Warner
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems
> raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so
> here's my +1 too.
>
> Rick
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> Here's my +1.
>> I reviewed the source and binaries in
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
>>> maven-release-plugin.
>>>
>>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>>
>>> See the jira issues here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965<
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>>> >
>>>
>>> Staged to
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/<
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz<
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>>> >
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip<
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>>> plausible builds from them.
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems
raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not,
so here's my +1 too.
Rick
Kevan Miller wrote:
> Here's my +1.
>
> I reviewed the source and binaries
> in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
>
> --kevan
>
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using
>> the maven-release-plugin.
>>
>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>
>> See the jira issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Many thanks
>> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Here's my +1.
I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
--kevan
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Ashish Jain wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are
> you able to access the links?
Try this one:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
For some reason, this link is going to the -024 version, not the -043
version in David's email.
Rick
>
> Thanks
> Ashish
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com
> <ma...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built
> using the maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
> something plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Ashish Jain <as...@gmail.com>.
Hi David,
Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are you able
to access the links?
Thanks
Ashish
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1
Ran Tomcat assembly on my Mac with JDK 1.6 and a couple small samples.
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
I'm still not happy about the README & RELEASE_NOTES missing from the
assemblies ... so I was kinda hoping some other more critical problem
was found so that we could include these on a re-spin :-) . However, I
don't think it makes sense to stop the vote for just that so here is my
+1.
Everything else I checked looked good.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Bill Stoddard <wg...@gmail.com>.
Lin Sun wrote:
> +1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified
> a few link function okay.
>
> Thanks for pulling together this release David. I visited the jira
> list, it contains hundreds of items!
>
>
Indeed, that's an impressive list! Lots of good stuff in this release.
Congrats!
Bill
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
+1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified
a few link function okay.
Thanks for pulling together this release David. I visited the jira
list, it contains hundreds of items!
Lin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:56 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> The plugins have to be rebuilt for 2.2, as the CAR files include references
> to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, which the released 2.2 server doesn't include aliases
> for.... Once the 2.2 server artifacts have been replicated to the mirror
> repos, I'll update the openjpa2 plugin and publish new snapshots and update
> the XML file.
>
> David, can you update the XML file for geronimo-2.2?
>
> Maybe Ivan or someone else will have time to look at the Samples.
>
I will look at the Samples.
>
>
> -Donald
>
> Forrest
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
The plugins have to be rebuilt for 2.2, as the CAR files include
references to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, which the released 2.2 server doesn't
include aliases for.... Once the 2.2 server artifacts have been
replicated to the mirror repos, I'll update the openjpa2 plugin and
publish new snapshots and update the XML file.
David, can you update the XML file for geronimo-2.2?
Maybe Ivan or someone else will have time to look at the Samples.
-Donald
frapien wrote:
> can any one please update the number for <version>2.2-SNAPSHOT</version> in
> http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
> http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
> http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/openjpa2/geronimo-plugins.xml?
> good lock
> --frank
>
>
> <
> David Jencks wrote:
>> I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.
>>
>> I've tried to figure out what needs to go to
>> the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
>> <http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/> and set up
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/
>>
>> with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps
>> from people who have done releases before?
>
>
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by frapien <fr...@gmx.de>.
can any one please update the number for <version>2.2-SNAPSHOT</version> in
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/openjpa2/geronimo-plugins.xml?
good lock
--frank
<
David Jencks wrote:
> I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.
>
> I've tried to figure out what needs to go to
> the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/> and set up
>
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/
>
> with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps
> from people who have done releases before?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--geronimo-2.2-release-%282nd-try%29-tp26691840s134p26774135.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
You can compare it to the 2.1.4 files located here for reference:
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.1.4/
I took a quick look. Things looked fairly similar to what we included
in previous releases. Missing from your setup were the LICENSE, NOTICE,
and RELEASE_NOTES. I'm not sure how critical the LICENSE & NOTICE are
... but it doesn't hurt to include them. I think the RELEASE_NOTES are
important because they are typically included in a reference from the
download page. I know I sound like a broken record here but I think
this is really important with 2.2 because the RELEASE_NOTES are not
included in the assembly images. I would personally recommend to
include the README in this location as well with a link from the
download page for similar reasons with 2.2.
I thought I had a script I used for previous release but I can't find it
at the moment.
One more thing - At one time there were storage issues on the dist
server and so we were asked to keep just the most important releases at
that location and update all other references on the download pages to
the archive. Now that 2.2 is being added we should consider removing
2.1.3 leaving only 2.2 and 2.1.4.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
> I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.
>
> I've tried to figure out what needs to go to
> the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/> and set up
>
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/
>
> with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps
> from people who have done releases before?
>
> Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff? I did this:
>
> 123 19:32 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2
> 127 19:33 cp
> repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release*
> ../2.2/
> 128 19:35 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
> 129 19:36 cp
> repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/*bin.*
> ../2.2/
> 130 19:37 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
> 131 19:38 cp
> repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/*bin.*
> ../2.2/
> 132 19:38 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
> 133 19:39 cp
> repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/*bin.*
> ../2.2/
> 134 19:40 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
> 135 19:40 cp
> repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/*bin.*
> ../2.2/
> 136 19:41 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
> 137 19:42 cp
> repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/*bin.*
> ../2.2/
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I've waited long enough.
>>
>> We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet
>> profile tcks.
>>
>> +1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,
>> linsun (all pmc)
>>
>> no other votes.
>>
>> I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the
>> release download page.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using
>>> the maven-release-plugin.
>>>
>>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>>
>>> See the jira issues here:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>>>
>>> Staged to
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>>>
>>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>>> plausible builds from them.
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>
>
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.
I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
and set up
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/
with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review
perhaps from people who have done releases before?
Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff? I did this:
123 19:32 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2
127 19:33 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release* ../2.2/
128 19:35 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
129 19:36 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
*bin.* ../2.2/
130 19:37 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
131 19:38 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
*bin.* ../2.2/
132 19:38 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
133 19:39 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
*bin.* ../2.2/
134 19:40 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
135 19:40 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
*bin.* ../2.2/
136 19:41 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
137 19:42 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
*bin.* ../2.2/
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've waited long enough.
>
> We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic
> servlet profile tcks.
>
> +1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,
> linsun (all pmc)
>
> no other votes.
>
> I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for
> the release download page.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built
>> using the maven-release-plugin.
>>
>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>
>> See the jira issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
>> something plausible builds from them.
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Many thanks
>> david jencks
>
[PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I've waited long enough.
We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet
profile tcks.
+1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,
linsun (all pmc)
no other votes.
I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the
release download page.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using
> the maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
> something plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
I built the server from the source tar and was able to deploy and run my
app (includes EJBs, JPA, messaging, JSPs).
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks