You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by kf...@collab.net on 2005/11/21 17:30:44 UTC

Re: Rolling rc3 - tarball issue

Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> On 11/21/05, Daniel Berlin <db...@dberlin.org> wrote:
> > Apparently, we need some official resolution on the issue of what to
> > name the tarballs, and whether to keep the double tarball (deps and
> > nodeps) regime.
> >
> > I'm +1 on naming the "deps" tarball as regular, and make "nodeps" be the
> > suffixed one.
> >
> > I'm +1 on dropping the nodeps tarball entirely.
> 
> +1 on both of those options, leaning towards dropping the nodeps
> entirely because I just don't think it's worth the hassle and sticking
> with the current state of the union can't be that bad.

+1 here too.  Nodeps is an idea whose time has not quite yet come.

> Either way, we need to resolve this right now.  This release has seen
> far too many delays as it is, and we need a tarball we can actually
> release to users.

Also +1!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Rolling rc3 - tarball issue

Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@collab.net>.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Karl Fogel wrote:

> Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > On 11/21/05, Daniel Berlin <db...@dberlin.org> wrote:
> > > Apparently, we need some official resolution on the issue of what to
> > > name the tarballs, and whether to keep the double tarball (deps and
> > > nodeps) regime.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on naming the "deps" tarball as regular, and make "nodeps" be the
> > > suffixed one.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on dropping the nodeps tarball entirely.
> > 
> > +1 on both of those options, leaning towards dropping the nodeps
> > entirely because I just don't think it's worth the hassle and sticking
> > with the current state of the union can't be that bad.
> 
> +1 here too.  Nodeps is an idea whose time has not quite yet come.

+1
-- 

Daniel Rall

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org