You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu> on 2022/09/29 20:54:19 UTC

qname and domain tests iin spamassassin

/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:#askdns 
   DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL  _DKIMDOMAIN_._vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org TXT /^([a-z]+ 
)*(transaction|list|all)( [a-z]+)*$/
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:#askdns 
   __DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL_ANY  _DKIMDOMAIN_._vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org TXT


note _vouch have the underscore to disable 
https://www.isc.org/blogs/qname-minimization-and-privacy/

so as today there is no rules that is not qname compatible ?

but i still is not sure its now safe to enable qname-minimization in 
bind9 named.conf

# qname-minimization ( strict | relaxed | disabled | off );
	qname-minimization disabled;

in named.conf options section

is spamassassin rules 100% bugfree with it ?