You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com> on 2006/05/05 11:57:34 UTC
[Axis2] Extending databinding code generation
I've been looking into implementing unwrapping of method call parameters
for JiBX. The current code generation approach uses several different
XSLT templates, with some templates just generating generic code for
handling the service operations while the details of conversions to and
from XML are handled by toOm()/toEnvelope() and fromOm() that are
specific to the data binding approach being used. For unwrapped handling
I think we need to change the code generation to use an in-line
approach, where the data binding framework is invoked to generate code
that gets embedded directly within the operation method on the client
stub, or within the invokeBusinessLogic method of the message receiver
on the server. The reason I'm suggesting this is because the current
approach of calling other methods gets very messy when you're passing or
returning a list of objects, rather than just a single object.
I don't know how well this will fit with the current
org.apache.axis2.wsdl.codegen.emitter.AxisServiceBasedMultiLanguageEmitter.
At a minimum, it's going to need to pass additional information in the
XML documents used to drive the code generation (since each data binding
framework will have it's own approach to handle unwrapping, and will
need to pass the appropriate information to its code generation
template). I can just start extending the current code to support
unwrapped with JiBX, but figured I'd bring it up for discussion first to
see if anyone else is working in this area.
To enable unwrapping I assume we'll want a WSDL2Java flag, as in Axis1.
Each framework would be able to check this flag and then set
per-operation flags to control the code generation, selecting between
the current form (toOm()/toEnvelope() and fromOm()) and an unwrapped
approach. The AxisServiceBasedMultiLanguageEmitter would then use this
per-operation flag to control how that operation is generated.
- Dennis
--
Dennis M. Sosnoski
SOA, Web Services, and XML
Training and Consulting
http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
Seattle, WA +1-425-296-6194 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
Re: [Axis2] Extending databinding code generation
Posted by Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com>.
After looking at this in more detail my inclination is to extend the
existing TypeMapping schema used by the code generation so that it can
carry information for the data binding frameworks. Right now the type
mapping goes from an element qname (which I believe is always the
element referenced by a message part) to a Java class name. That's fine
for plain doc/lit, but for wrapped we need better granularity. Just as
one example, the same element name can be used for different purposes
and even different types of values within different wrapped operations.
That means context information is needed, so that the data binding
framework knows when it's generating code for a foo(user, password) call
as opposed to a bar(user, amount, items) call.
My thought is to allow the value of a type mapping to be either the Java
class name String, as now, or an org.w3c.dom.Element. If the Element
value is seen, the code generation will know that the data binding
framework wants to handle this message part directly, and will include
the Element in the XML document passed to the XSLT, which in turn will
invoke the data binding XSLT for the details of the handling. It'll be
the responsibility of the data binding framework to generate code that
constructs the argument list for the service method call in the message
receiver, and that constructs the document from the arguments in the
client stub.
Any comments?
- Dennis
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> I've been looking into implementing unwrapping of method call
> parameters for JiBX. The current code generation approach uses several
> different XSLT templates, with some templates just generating generic
> code for handling the service operations while the details of
> conversions to and from XML are handled by toOm()/toEnvelope() and
> fromOm() that are specific to the data binding approach being used.
> For unwrapped handling I think we need to change the code generation
> to use an in-line approach, where the data binding framework is
> invoked to generate code that gets embedded directly within the
> operation method on the client stub, or within the invokeBusinessLogic
> method of the message receiver on the server. The reason I'm
> suggesting this is because the current approach of calling other
> methods gets very messy when you're passing or returning a list of
> objects, rather than just a single object.
>
> I don't know how well this will fit with the current
> org.apache.axis2.wsdl.codegen.emitter.AxisServiceBasedMultiLanguageEmitter.
> At a minimum, it's going to need to pass additional information in the
> XML documents used to drive the code generation (since each data
> binding framework will have it's own approach to handle unwrapping,
> and will need to pass the appropriate information to its code
> generation template). I can just start extending the current code to
> support unwrapped with JiBX, but figured I'd bring it up for
> discussion first to see if anyone else is working in this area.
>
> To enable unwrapping I assume we'll want a WSDL2Java flag, as in
> Axis1. Each framework would be able to check this flag and then set
> per-operation flags to control the code generation, selecting between
> the current form (toOm()/toEnvelope() and fromOm()) and an unwrapped
> approach. The AxisServiceBasedMultiLanguageEmitter would then use this
> per-operation flag to control how that operation is generated.
>
> - Dennis
>