You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/10/30 00:56:12 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (PIG-2423) document use case where co-group is
better choice than join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13486527#comment-13486527 ]
Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-2423:
-------------------------------------
Thejas, should this be assigned to you? Is this going to go into 0.11 or 0.12?
> document use case where co-group is better choice than join
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-2423
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2423
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Thejas M Nair
> Fix For: 0.11
>
>
> Optimization rules 2 and 3 suggested in https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12506841/pig_tpch.ppt (PIG-2397) recommend the use of co-group instead of join in certain cases. These should be documented in pig performance page.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira