You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> on 2014/12/20 12:09:06 UTC
[ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
H,
given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
--
Daan
Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
Posted by Marcus <sh...@gmail.com>.
Until we have 4.5 out, I think it's fair to keep up with bugfix releases
for the current and previously released versions. I know we discussed the
support cycle at one point, but I don't have it handy right now.
Besides, there seems to be a lot of interest in 4.3 at the moment, and
investment in its stability.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:
> +1 I'm sure a lot of users may be comfortable in upgrading to a minor
> release than a major release.
>
> I've already backported most of the fixes that I did for 4.3 to 4.4
> branch and have updated the CHANGES file here;
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
> blob;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.4
>
> Last time I checked using git "ours" merge strategy, 4.3 cleanly merges
> into 4.4 branch but probably not a right way to do merges.
>
>
> On Saturday 20 December 2014 05:23 PM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> +1 for backporting some fixes to 4.4, thank you Santa.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "dev" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Saturday, 20 December, 2014 11:09:06
>>> Subject: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
>>>
>>
>> H,
>>>
>>> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
>>> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
>>> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
>>>
>>> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
>>> --
>>> Daan
>>>
>>
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/
> iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-
> engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/
> cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/
> cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
+1 I'm sure a lot of users may be comfortable in upgrading to a minor
release than a major release.
I've already backported most of the fixes that I did for 4.3 to 4.4
branch and have updated the CHANGES file here;
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.4
Last time I checked using git "ours" merge strategy, 4.3 cleanly merges
into 4.4 branch but probably not a right way to do merges.
On Saturday 20 December 2014 05:23 PM, Nux! wrote:
> +1 for backporting some fixes to 4.4, thank you Santa.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com>
>> To: "dev" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, 20 December, 2014 11:09:06
>> Subject: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
>
>> H,
>>
>> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
>> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
>> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
>>
>> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
>> --
>> Daan
--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
+1 for backporting some fixes to 4.4, thank you Santa.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com>
> To: "dev" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, 20 December, 2014 11:09:06
> Subject: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
> H,
>
> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
>
> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
> --
> Daan
Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:52 PM, sebgoa <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
...
> Increasing our release cadence will force us to solve our development processes and infra issues.
exactly, I did't feel like it at all but this is kind of my reasoning as well.
>> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
--
Daan
Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
Posted by sebgoa <ru...@gmail.com>.
On Dec 20, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> H,
>
> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
>
Hi Daan,
To keep it short: +1
Increasing our release cadence will force us to solve our development processes and infra issues.
> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
> --
> Daan
Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
Posted by Tomasz Zięba <t....@gmail.com>.
+1
H,
given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
--
Daan