[GitHub] [dubbo] chickenlj commented on pull request #10297: fix for issue#10283

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

chickenlj commented on PR #10297:
URL: https://github.com/apache/dubbo/pull/10297#issuecomment-1185081623

   我们要思考下一直重试和重试3次之间的区别，哪个是我们更需要的？我觉得从保证消费端稳定性的视角，以固定周期或者指数退避的重复策略，一直保持重试直到恢复的策略更可靠一些。
   
   因为当众多的消费端在运行态收到地址更新事件后，不论何种原因导致meta获取失败，如果不保持重试我们无法确保他们在 meta 获取恢复后所有消费端都能恢复到正常状态，而重启所有这些消费端或触发新的地址推送事件并不容易实现，我们只能确保它们有自动恢复机制。


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@dubbo.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@dubbo.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-help@dubbo.apache.org