You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by SM <sm...@resistor.net> on 2014/05/01 16:44:51 UTC

60_adsp_override_dkim.cf (was: Plans for a DMARC plugin ???)

Hi Mark,
At 04:15 30-04-2014, Mark Martinec wrote:
>If you want to implement a similar effect to the new yahoo and
>aol DMARC policy by SpamAssassin, use rules similar to the
>default rules in 60_adsp_override_dkim.cf:
>
>   adsp_override yahoo.com      custom_med
>   adsp_override yahoo.com.ar   custom_med
>   adsp_override yahoo.com.au   custom_med
>   adsp_override yahoo.com.br   custom_med
>   adsp_override yahoo.com.cn   custom_med
>   adsp_override yahoo.com.hk   custom_med
>   ...

I did a quick verification.  The above domains do not publish an ADSP record.

Regards,
-sm

Re: 60_adsp_override_dkim.cf (was: Plans for a DMARC plugin ???)

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.

>> If you want to implement a similar effect to the new yahoo and
>> aol DMARC policy by SpamAssassin, use rules similar to the
>> default rules in 60_adsp_override_dkim.cf:
>> 
>>   adsp_override yahoo.com      custom_med
>>   adsp_override yahoo.com.ar   custom_med
>>   adsp_override yahoo.com.au   custom_med
>>   adsp_override yahoo.com.br   custom_med
>>   adsp_override yahoo.com.cn   custom_med
>>   adsp_override yahoo.com.hk   custom_med
>>   ...

-sm writes:
> I did a quick verification.  The above domains do not publish an ADSP 
> record.

Indeed. This is precisely the reason it is useful to *override*
by a local rule whatever some domain publishes or not publishes.

   Mark