[GitHub] [airflow] BasPH opened a new pull request #5910: [WIP][AIRFLOW-5307] Move BaseOperator to airflow.operators.base_operator

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

BasPH opened a new pull request #5910: [WIP][AIRFLOW-5307] Move BaseOperator to airflow.operators.base_operator
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5910
 
 
   **WIP: working out a bug in the docs.**
   
   Make sure you have checked _all_ steps below.
   
   ### Jira
   
   - [x] My PR addresses the following [Airflow Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW/) issues and references them in the PR title. For example, "\[AIRFLOW-XXX\] My Airflow PR"
     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5307
     - In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your commit with \[AIRFLOW-XXX\], code changes always need a Jira issue.
     - In case you are proposing a fundamental code change, you need to create an Airflow Improvement Proposal ([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals)).
     - In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   
   ### Description
   
   - [x] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI changes:
   
   The BaseOperator currently resides in /airflow/models but has never been a database model, i.e. it is not stored in a database table. I suggest to move it to its logical place, the operators package.
   
   To preserve backwards compatibility I import the BaseOperator in /airflow/models/\_\_init\_\_.py and raise a DeprecationWarning when imported from there. All references to airflow.models.BaseOperator have been removed and I suggest to remove backward compatibility in Airflow 2.0.
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [x] My PR adds the following unit tests __OR__ does not need testing for this extremely good reason:
   
   No test logic altered, only moved package names.
   
   ### Commits
   
   - [x] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
     1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
     1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
     1. Subject does not end with a period
     1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
     1. Body wraps at 72 characters
     1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [x] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it.
     - All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain docstrings that explain what it does
     - If you implement backwards incompatible changes, please leave a note in the [Updating.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md) so we can assign it to a appropriate release
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - [x] Passes `flake8`
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services