You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by "Christopher S. Hutchinson" <cs...@fzcorp.com> on 2018/10/09 16:01:44 UTC
Apache Arrow .NET implementation
I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
Seems like there's no major objections to this code donation, and the
developers intend to keep working on it. I'll start a vote and we can
move forward the donation process
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:24 PM Phillip Cloud <cp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> I agree that .NET + Arrow is a good match. Generally speaking, I'm not sure
> there are many systems programming languages whose communities wouldn't
> benefit from an Arrow implementation. I do think it's worth discussing what
> to do about the growing numbers of implementations, but that shouldn't
> block donation of this code. I think there are likely some interesting
> things to explore using C#'s asynchronous APIs as well as potential for
> more esoteric interactions with IronPython and other .NET software. Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:52 AM Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Ah, sorry. I think it would be good for the project to have a foot in
> > the .NET ecosystem. I'm not able to comment more specifically, but the
> > general idea sounds fine to me.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> > Le 11/10/2018 à 12:46, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > > This is a topic that bears discussion but I don't think it's related to
> > > whether we accept this donation of IP into the Apache project. Let's
> > > discuss that separately.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 12:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > >>> hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++.
> > >>
> > >> That is what I understood. My question was whether we want to continue
> > >> gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET
> > >> implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> Antoine.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So this is a new
> > >>> implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
> > >>> present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
> > >>> to the integration test matrix.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Wes
> > >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
> > >>>> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
> > >>>> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
> > >>>> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
> > >>>> repository.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Antoine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
> > >>>> Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
> > >>>>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
> > >>>>> .NET library available (
> > https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
> > >>>>> there may be some interesting collaborations.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Wes
> > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
> > >>>>> <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity
> > >> separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as
> > our
> > >> product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot
> > to
> > >> include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the
> > >> secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
> > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> > >>>>>> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> hi Christopher,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to
> > >> continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Wes
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <
> > >> cshutchinson@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has
> > >> developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We
> > are
> > >> donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The
> > source
> > >> code is available for review on GitHub:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave
> > >> issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Phillip Cloud <cp...@gmail.com>.
+1.
I agree that .NET + Arrow is a good match. Generally speaking, I'm not sure
there are many systems programming languages whose communities wouldn't
benefit from an Arrow implementation. I do think it's worth discussing what
to do about the growing numbers of implementations, but that shouldn't
block donation of this code. I think there are likely some interesting
things to explore using C#'s asynchronous APIs as well as potential for
more esoteric interactions with IronPython and other .NET software. Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:52 AM Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
>
> Ah, sorry. I think it would be good for the project to have a foot in
> the .NET ecosystem. I'm not able to comment more specifically, but the
> general idea sounds fine to me.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:46, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > This is a topic that bears discussion but I don't think it's related to
> > whether we accept this donation of IP into the Apache project. Let's
> > discuss that separately.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 12:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> >>> hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++.
> >>
> >> That is what I understood. My question was whether we want to continue
> >> gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET
> >> implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antoine.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So this is a new
> >>> implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
> >>> present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
> >>> to the integration test matrix.
> >>>
> >>> - Wes
> >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
> >>>> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
> >>>> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
> >>>> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
> >>>>
> >>>> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
> >>>> repository.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Antoine.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
> >>>> Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
> >>>>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
> >>>>> .NET library available (
> https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
> >>>>> there may be some interesting collaborations.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Wes
> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
> >>>>> <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity
> >> separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as
> our
> >> product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot
> to
> >> include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the
> >> secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> >>>>>> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> hi Christopher,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to
> >> continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Wes
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <
> >> cshutchinson@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has
> >> developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We
> are
> >> donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The
> source
> >> code is available for review on GitHub:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave
> >> issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>.
Ah, sorry. I think it would be good for the project to have a foot in
the .NET ecosystem. I'm not able to comment more specifically, but the
general idea sounds fine to me.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 11/10/2018 à 12:46, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> This is a topic that bears discussion but I don't think it's related to
> whether we accept this donation of IP into the Apache project. Let's
> discuss that separately.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 12:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit :
>>> hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++.
>>
>> That is what I understood. My question was whether we want to continue
>> gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET
>> implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antoine.
>>
>>
>>
>> So this is a new
>>> implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
>>> present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
>>> to the integration test matrix.
>>>
>>> - Wes
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
>>>> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
>>>> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
>>>> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
>>>>
>>>> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
>>>> repository.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Antoine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
>>>> Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
>>>>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
>>>>> .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
>>>>> there may be some interesting collaborations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Wes
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
>>>>> <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity
>> separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our
>> product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to
>> include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the
>> secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
>>>>>> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hi Christopher,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to
>> continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Wes
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <
>> cshutchinson@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has
>> developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are
>> donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source
>> code is available for review on GitHub:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave
>> issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
This is a topic that bears discussion but I don't think it's related to
whether we accept this donation of IP into the Apache project. Let's
discuss that separately.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 12:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
>
> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++.
>
> That is what I understood. My question was whether we want to continue
> gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET
> implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
>
> So this is a new
> > implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
> > present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
> > to the integration test matrix.
> >
> > - Wes
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
> >> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
> >> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
> >> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
> >>
> >> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
> >> repository.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antoine.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
> >> Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
> >>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
> >>> .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
> >>> there may be some interesting collaborations.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Wes
> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
> >>> <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity
> separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our
> product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to
> include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the
> secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> >>>> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
> >>>>
> >>>> hi Christopher,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to
> continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Wes
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <
> cshutchinson@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has
> developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are
> donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source
> code is available for review on GitHub:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave
> issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>.
Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++.
That is what I understood. My question was whether we want to continue
gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET
implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo.
Regards
Antoine.
So this is a new
> implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
> present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
> to the integration test matrix.
>
> - Wes
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
>> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
>> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
>> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
>>
>> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
>> repository.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antoine.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
>> Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
>>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
>>> .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
>>> there may be some interesting collaborations.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wes
>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
>>> <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
>>>> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
>>>>
>>>> hi Christopher,
>>>>
>>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Wes
>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
>>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++. So this is a new
implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
to the integration test matrix.
- Wes
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net> wrote:
>
>
> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
>
> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
> repository.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
> Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
> > bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
> > .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
> > there may be some interesting collaborations.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
> > <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
> > >
> > > hi Christopher,
> > >
> > > This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wes
> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> > > >
> >
>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Antoine Pitrou <so...@pitrou.net>.
If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to
run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
repository.
Regards
Antoine.
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
> .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
> there may be some interesting collaborations.
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
> <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> >
> > I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
> >
> > hi Christopher,
> >
> > This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> > >
>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
.NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
there may be some interesting collaborations.
Thanks,
Wes
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
<cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>
> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
>
> hi Christopher,
>
> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
> >
> > https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> >
RE: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by "Christopher S. Hutchinson" <cs...@fzcorp.com>.
I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
hi Christopher,
This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
Thanks,
Wes
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>
> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
>
> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
>
Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
hi Christopher,
This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to
continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
Thanks,
Wes
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
<cs...@fzcorp.com> wrote:
>
> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source code is available for review on GitHub:
>
> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
>