You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to c-dev@axis.apache.org by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@yahoo.com> on 2004/10/29 12:35:25 UTC

HTTP 1.1 vs. HTTP 1.0

Hi All,
   For the client transport, I am trying to support the Keep-alive header.

   HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 1.0 has totally different approaches.

   My question is, do we need to bother about HTTP 1.0? (Are there many HTTP 1.0 servers hosting
Web Services?

   Supporting HTTP 1.1 keep-alive is quite simple (in fact it is "Connection:close" header in HTTP
1.1)

Thanks,
Samisa...


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Re: HTTP 1.1 vs. HTTP 1.0

Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.

IMO: Forget about keep-alive for HTTP/1.0 ..

SAnjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Samisa Abeysinghe" <sa...@yahoo.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: HTTP 1.1 vs. HTTP 1.0


> Hi All,
>    For the client transport, I am trying to support the Keep-alive header.
>
>    HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 1.0 has totally different approaches.
>
>    My question is, do we need to bother about HTTP 1.0? (Are there many
HTTP 1.0 servers hosting
> Web Services?
>
>    Supporting HTTP 1.1 keep-alive is quite simple (in fact it is
"Connection:close" header in HTTP
> 1.1)
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>