Fwd: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4

[ant elder <an...@gmail.com>]

Anyone likely to have any time to take a look at this? If its possible to do
something to fix this it would be good to try to get it done in the 1.1.1
release.

   ...ant

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric S Rose <es...@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org


Frank,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I got busy with some other stuff
that had to be done yesterday.

I've been debugging the problem all morning, and it seems to come down to a
NullPointerException from eStaticClass() in ReferenceImpl. Here's the code
where I'm seeing the exception:

*protected* EClass eStaticClass()
{
* return* SDOPackage.*eINSTANCE*.getReference();
}

SDOPackage.eINSTANCE is null, so SDOPackageImpl.init() is returning null for
some reason. I'm not sure that really answers your question, but I hope it's
helpful.

Thanks,
Eric

[image: Inactive hide details for Frank Budinsky ---04/15/2008 04:28:04
PM---Eric, Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supp]Frank
Budinsky ---04/15/2008 04:28:04 PM---Eric, Theoretically EMF 2.4 should
work, because it's supposed to be backward


From:
Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>
To:

tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Date:
04/15/2008 04:28 PM
Subject:

Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4
------------------------------



Eric,

Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supposed to be backward
compatible. Have you tracked down exactly what class is missing and why?

Frank.

Eric S Rose <es...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 04/15/2008 03:36:49 PM:

> David,
>
> EMF 2.2.3 is what I've been using also up until this point. My code
> is integrating with a project that's already using EMF 2.4, so I
> need to align with the larger project. Based on what I've seen so
> far, it doesn't look like that's a possibility.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> [image removed] "David Adcox" ---04/15/2008 03:10:11 PM---The latest
> version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what is
> currently specified in the

>
> [image removed]
> From:
>
> [image removed]
> "David Adcox" <co...@gmail.com>
>
> [image removed]
> To:
>
> [image removed]
> tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
>
> [image removed]
> Date:
>
> [image removed]
> 04/15/2008 03:10 PM
>
> [image removed]
> Subject:
>
> [image removed]
> Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4
>
>
>
>
> The latest version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what
> is currently specified in the pom files.  Is there a reason you need
> to use a newer version of EMF?
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Eric S Rose <es...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Hello all,
> >
> >  Has anyone had any success running Java SDO with EMF 2.4?  I'm
running into
> >  a NoClassDefFoundError on SDOUtil.createHelperContext().  I've seen
this on
> >  both the 1.0 and 1.1 releases.
> >
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org