You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com> on 1998/09/10 23:30:00 UTC

Re: mod_proxy/2982: %f field of CustomLog should log cache filename for proxy: requests (fwd)

The following reply was made to PR mod_proxy/2982; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
To: apbugs@apache.org
Cc:  Subject: Re: mod_proxy/2982: %f field of CustomLog should log cache
 filename for proxy: requests (fwd)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:33:16 -0400 (EDT)
 From: Mike Clarkson <mi...@mail.nurinet.com>
 To: marc@apache.org
 Cc: lars@apache.org
 Subject: Re: mod_proxy/2982: %f field of CustomLog should log cache filename
     for proxy: requests
 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 > State-Changed-By: marc
 > State-Changed-When: Thu Sep 10 01:06:04 PDT 1998
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > Dupe of PR#2648 by the same author.  Please do not keep submitting
 > multiple reports on the same thing, especially when there is
 > no response logged in the previous entry to a query that
 > was asked the day after it was submitted.
 
 I'm sorry about the dupe; a mail on our mail server at our end meant I never
 saw the reply from lars. In our case it is useful because we are monitoring
 the Apache cache for files and using them when they appear in cache, but 
 in general logging redundent information seems less useful than logging
 potentially useful information that appears nowhere else. It seems to
 me the logical interpretation for %f in the case of a proxy: request.
 
 I'm really sorry about the dupe screwup, and I'll be more careful checking
 the database for followups.
 
 Many thanks,
 
 Mike.