Re: cvs commit: jakarta-velocity/xdocs vtl-reference-guide.xml texen.xml install.xml

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>]

Daniel Rall wrote:
> 
> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net> writes:
> 
> > Jon Stevens wrote:
> > >
> > > on 12/12/2000 1:36 PM, "Jose  Alberto Fernandez" <JF...@viquity.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why? I see no need for the "(" be together with the directive name.
> > > > I see no need for such rigid grammar, I do not see the current grammar to
> > > > be ambiguous or anything else. Why does this smplify explaining the
> > > > directives?
> > > >
> > > > Jose Alberto
> > >
> > > I agree.
> > >
> > > #foo (
> > > #foo     (
> > > #foo(
> > >
> > > should all work.
> >
> > The do all work. We are talking about documentation...
> >
> > For the documentation, which was the original post of this thread, a
> > single consistant style might be nice and easier to read.
> 
> I agree with you, but there should be a note saying that variations
> are in fact functional.  :)

Maybe we could have random amounts of spaces inserted at render time in
the directive examples in the docs on the site :)

(And they are functional...)

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                               geirm@optonline.com
Velocity : it's not just a good idea. It should be the law.
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity