You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2016/11/30 11:22:32 UTC
[Bug 7377] New: T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
Bug ID: 7377
Summary: T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.4.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: spamassassin
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: yuri@deepunix.net
Target Milestone: Undefined
Basically:
$ spamassassin -t -L -D dkim < ny.eml
Nov 30 05:14:29.033 [7424] dbg: dkim: signature verification disabled, DNS
resolving not available
0.5 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not
valid
I consider this a bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
--- Comment #4 from RW <rw...@googlemail.com> ---
(In reply to YA from comment #3)
> I see what you're referring to. I should've setup a separate scoring when
> network is disabled, right?
No, the default score should be 0.01, which is the score for a testing rule.
Unless something strange happened the 0.5 score is locally defined.
> But why would this rule be triggered at all when
> no network exists? DKIM can't verify the sig when DNS is down.
Probably because that would require new perl, and at the moment it's just a
simple meta-rule.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
John Wilcock <jo...@tradoc.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |john@tradoc.fr
--- Comment #5 from John Wilcock <jo...@tradoc.fr> ---
It seems to me that
tflags T_DKIM_INVALID net
ought to solve the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
--- Comment #2 from RW <rw...@googlemail.com> ---
I missed the -L, but in future please state the problem clearly.
It is still only a testing rule that's only supposed to have a notional score.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
RW <rw...@googlemail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rwmaillists@googlemail.com
--- Comment #1 from RW <rw...@googlemail.com> ---
What do you think is a bug? Someone has rescored a rule that they shouldn't
have, and failed to setup dns correctly. Please take it up with whoever set
this up or take it to the user list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
AXB <ax...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from AXB <ax...@gmail.com> ---
for further discussion please move to SA users or Dev list
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
--- Comment #6 from RW <rw...@googlemail.com> ---
(In reply to John Wilcock from comment #5)
> It seems to me that tflags T_DKIM_INVALID net ought to solve the issue.
That only works with eval'ed rules, and T_DKIM_INVALID is a meta-rule.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7377] T_DKIM_INVALID score assigned on -L
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
--- Comment #3 from YA <yu...@deepunix.net> ---
I see what you're referring to. I should've setup a separate scoring when
network is disabled, right? But why would this rule be triggered at all when no
network exists? DKIM can't verify the sig when DNS is down.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.