You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lenya.apache.org by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org> on 2006/12/12 14:27:08 UTC
release situation
gang,
we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
months.
i see a couple possible scenarios:
a) we try again with 1.2.5
b) we retire the 1.2 branch
c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
i think we should do a, followed by b and c.
other ideas, comments?
-gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Joern Nettingsmeier <ne...@folkwang-hochschule.de>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Michael Wechner wrote:
>> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>> Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
>>>
>>>> no. exact the same means exactly that: they are the same.
>>>
>>>
>>> Recently were closed some interesting bugs, which makes sense to add
>>> to the release:
>>>
>>> 1. File and image upload not working in Bitflux [1]
>>> 2. "Checkin" menu item leads to exception [2]
>>> 3. Adding document-type parameter and template matcher for neutron
>>> protocol.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Also as Thorsten mentioned we should make the build and lenya scripts
>> executable. I guess this can be done within the ant target during zip
>> resp. tgz by using file permissions resp. mode.
>
> ok, i fixed the permissions. we are at 2 votes, need one more for this
> to pass.
the tarball compiles and runs fine here. i did some *very* basic testing
as well. dunno if i get a vote on this, but if so, i'm +1.
--
jörn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621
if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer
and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line
and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
>>
>>> no. exact the same means exactly that: they are the same.
>>
>>
>> Recently were closed some interesting bugs, which makes sense to add
>> to the release:
>>
>> 1. File and image upload not working in Bitflux [1]
>> 2. "Checkin" menu item leads to exception [2]
>> 3. Adding document-type parameter and template matcher for neutron
>> protocol.
>
>
> +1
>
> Also as Thorsten mentioned we should make the build and lenya scripts
> executable. I guess this can be done within the ant target during zip
> resp. tgz by using file permissions resp. mode.
ok, i fixed the permissions. we are at 2 votes, need one more for this
to pass.
-gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
>
>> no. exact the same means exactly that: they are the same.
>
>
> Recently were closed some interesting bugs, which makes sense to add
> to the release:
>
> 1. File and image upload not working in Bitflux [1]
> 2. "Checkin" menu item leads to exception [2]
> 3. Adding document-type parameter and template matcher for neutron
> protocol.
+1
Also as Thorsten mentioned we should make the build and lenya scripts
executable. I guess this can be done within the ant target during zip
resp. tgz by using file permissions resp. mode.
Cheers
Michi
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Antonio Gallardo.
>
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39360
> [2] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41296
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
> no. exact the same means exactly that: they are the same.
Recently were closed some interesting bugs, which makes sense to add to
the release:
1. File and image upload not working in Bitflux [1]
2. "Checkin" menu item leads to exception [2]
3. Adding document-type parameter and template matcher for neutron protocol.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39360
[2] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41296
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
>> ok, lets try again:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>
>> has the exact same tarballs from last time.
> Thank you, Gregor. I am not sure if I understand the last sentence of
> your mail. Just to be sure: Did you build with a newer subversion
> snapshot? I am asking, because there are some changes in the last 2
> months or so.
no. exact the same means exactly that: they are the same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
> ok, lets try again:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>
> has the exact same tarballs from last time.
Thank you, Gregor. I am not sure if I understand the last sentence of
your mail. Just to be sure: Did you build with a newer subversion
snapshot? I am asking, because there are some changes in the last 2
months or so.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>>> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
>>>> gang,
>>>>
>>>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5
>>>> release,
>>>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>>>
>>>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>>>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>>>> months.
>>>>
>>>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>>>
>>>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
[...]
> ok, lets try again:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>
> has the exact same tarballs from last time.
+1
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Michael Wechner wrote:
>
>> +1 for checking in the patch into SVN, but I think Gregor should make
>> a new tarball from
>> the most recent version of the 1.2.x branch with a clearly defined
>> revision number which the tarball is based on.
>
>
> ok. i will roll a fresh 1.2.5 from latest 1.2 svn later
Thanks
Michael
>
> at least now we have enough testers :)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
[TALLY] Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release
situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>> Michael Wechner wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for checking in the patch into SVN, but I think Gregor should make
>>> a new tarball from
>>> the most recent version of the 1.2.x branch with a clearly defined
>>> revision number which the tarball is based on.
>>
>> ok. i will roll a fresh 1.2.5 from latest 1.2 svn later
>>
>> at least now we have enough testers :)
>
> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>
> built from rev 507599
the vote passed with the necessary quorum of 3 +1
i will now upload the release to /dist and then announce in a couple days.
thanks!
-gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release
situation]
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:02 -0500, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
> > i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
> >
> > built from rev 507599
> >
> > chmod +x *.sh, too
> >
> > test please..
>
> ping?
jeje.
Finally I tested the basic functionality and here is my
+1
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Jann Forrer wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>
>>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>>
>>> built from rev 507599
>>>
>>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>>
>>> test please..
>
> +1 for a 1.2.5 release :-)
>
> I would suggest that we propose to use the cocoon version which comes
> with Gregors tarball (2.1.9?) and we might add a note that the release
> is tested with cocoon 2.1.10 too.
+1
which brings up the question of a release announcement that contains an
overview of the (many) fixes since 1.2.4. any volunteers?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Jann Forrer <ja...@id.uzh.ch>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>
>> built from rev 507599
>>
>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>
>> test please..
>
+1 for a 1.2.5 release :-)
I would suggest that we propose to use the cocoon version which comes
with Gregors tarball (2.1.9?) and we might add a note that the release
is tested with cocoon 2.1.10 too.
Jann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Josias Thöny <jo...@wyona.com>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>
>> built from rev 507599
>>
>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>
>> test please..
>
> ping?
Hi,
I have done some basic tests of the src tarball with
- cocoon 2.1.10
- jdk 1.4.2
- linux
Everything worked.
josias
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Michael Wechner schrieb:
[...]
> agreed. From Josias' feedback it seems that 2.1.10 is working, so I
> would suggest that set 2.1.10 within the INSTALL-SRC.
+1, I tested with 2.1.10 as well.
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Joern Nettingsmeier <ne...@folkwang-hochschule.de>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
> Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
>> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>
>>> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>>
>>>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>>>
>>>> built from rev 507599
>>>>
>>>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>>>
>>>> test please..
>>>
>>>
>>> ping?
>>
>>
>> builds fine, runs.
>>
>> one minor issue: edit with kupu, add internal link.
>> then edit with bxe: "the target attribute is not allowed in <a>"
>>
>> not a showstopper, but annoying.
>>
>> i'm not really familiar with 1.2, but everything i've tried looks ok.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> btw: which is the recommended cocoon version? the INSTALL-SRC file
>> mentions 2.1.7, but the example in build.properties says 2.1.9. unless
>> lenya 1.2 does indeed run with "2.1.7 or any later version", we should
>> clarify this.
>
>
> agreed. From Josias' feedback it seems that 2.1.10 is working, so I
> would suggest that set 2.1.10 within the INSTALL-SRC.
>
> WDYT?
well, if we don't need 2.1.10, we shouldn't specify it and force users
into needless upgrades. instead, maybe the INSTALL-SRC should say "known
to work with cocoon versions 2.1.7 to 2.1.10".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
> Michael Wechner wrote:
>
>> agreed. From Josias' feedback it seems that 2.1.10 is working, so I
>> would suggest that set 2.1.10 within the INSTALL-SRC.
>
> i'd rather not have to change the tarball again and roll a third
> candidate, but if it's a showstopper for you..
I would says yes. Because a lot of people can just download lenya and go
ahead once it does not work when they follow the install instructions.
WDYT?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
> agreed. From Josias' feedback it seems that 2.1.10 is working, so I
> would suggest that set 2.1.10 within the INSTALL-SRC.
i'd rather not have to change the tarball again and roll a third
candidate, but if it's a showstopper for you..
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>
>>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>>
>>> built from rev 507599
>>>
>>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>>
>>> test please..
>>
>>
>> ping?
>
>
> builds fine, runs.
>
> one minor issue: edit with kupu, add internal link.
> then edit with bxe: "the target attribute is not allowed in <a>"
>
> not a showstopper, but annoying.
>
> i'm not really familiar with 1.2, but everything i've tried looks ok.
>
> +1
>
> btw: which is the recommended cocoon version? the INSTALL-SRC file
> mentions 2.1.7, but the example in build.properties says 2.1.9. unless
> lenya 1.2 does indeed run with "2.1.7 or any later version", we should
> clarify this.
agreed. From Josias' feedback it seems that 2.1.10 is working, so I
would suggest that set 2.1.10 within the INSTALL-SRC.
WDYT?
Michi
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Joern Nettingsmeier <ne...@folkwang-hochschule.de>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>
>> built from rev 507599
>>
>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>
>> test please..
>
> ping?
builds fine, runs.
one minor issue: edit with kupu, add internal link.
then edit with bxe: "the target attribute is not allowed in <a>"
not a showstopper, but annoying.
i'm not really familiar with 1.2, but everything i've tried looks ok.
+1
btw: which is the recommended cocoon version? the INSTALL-SRC file
mentions 2.1.7, but the example in build.properties says 2.1.9. unless
lenya 1.2 does indeed run with "2.1.7 or any later version", we should
clarify this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>
>>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>>
>>> built from rev 507599
>>>
>>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>>
>>> test please..
>>
>>
>> ping?
>
>
> I think it would be good if we could forward your email also to the user
> mailing list and ask "users" to test it as well.
> Or is this causing problems with some ASF guideline?
sure, go ahead
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>
>> built from rev 507599
>>
>> chmod +x *.sh, too
>>
>> test please..
>
>
> ping?
I think it would be good if we could forward your email also to the user
mailing list and ask "users" to test it as well.
Or is this causing problems with some ASF guideline?
Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
>
> built from rev 507599
>
> chmod +x *.sh, too
>
> test please..
ping?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
[VOTE] one more time: Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Michael Wechner wrote:
>
>> +1 for checking in the patch into SVN, but I think Gregor should make
>> a new tarball from
>> the most recent version of the 1.2.x branch with a clearly defined
>> revision number which the tarball is based on.
>
> ok. i will roll a fresh 1.2.5 from latest 1.2 svn later
>
> at least now we have enough testers :)
i put fresh 1.2.5 tarballs up at people.apache.org/~gregor/
built from rev 507599
chmod +x *.sh, too
test please..
-grgor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió:
> Michael Wechner wrote:
>
>> +1 for checking in the patch into SVN, but I think Gregor should make
>> a new tarball from
>> the most recent version of the 1.2.x branch with a clearly defined
>> revision number which the tarball is based on.
>
> ok. i will roll a fresh 1.2.5 from latest 1.2 svn later
Thank you Gregor.
>
> at least now we have enough testers :)
lol.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
> +1 for checking in the patch into SVN, but I think Gregor should make a
> new tarball from
> the most recent version of the 1.2.x branch with a clearly defined
> revision number which the tarball is based on.
ok. i will roll a fresh 1.2.5 from latest 1.2 svn later
at least now we have enough testers :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Jann Forrer wrote:
>Jann Forrer wrote:
>
>
>>Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>gang,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5
>>>>>>release,
>>>>>>and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>>>>>>worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>>>>>>months.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>a) we try again with 1.2.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>+1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
>>>>>branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I tested the basic functionality now.
>>>>
>>>>+1 to vote again for a release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>ok, lets try again:
>>>
>>>http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>>
>>>has the exact same tarballs from last time.
>>>
>>>
>>I did test the most important feature. I found one important bug:
>>
>>If I change the proxy settings in publication.xconf the urls are
>>corectlly rewritten in the content area but not the menu i.e. if i use
>>the following proxy entry:
>>
>><proxy area="live" ssl="false" url="http://idlnxjaf.unizh.ch/default"/>
>>
>>I end up with a link like:
>>http://idlnxjaf.unizh.ch/default/tutorial/abc.html
>>in the content area but the link in the menu entry looks like:
>>http://localhost:8080/lenya/default/live/tutorial/abc.html
>>
>>Can somebody confirm this? If yes that should be fixed imo before a
>>1.2.5 relaease.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I found the problem. The parameter root is defined in navigation.xmap
>and refined in sitetree2nav.xsl. Changing sitetree2nav.xsl as follows
>fixes this problem:
>
>Index: sitetree2nav.xsl
>===================================================================
>--- sitetree2nav.xsl (revision 501784)
>+++ sitetree2nav.xsl (working copy)
>@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
> >
>
> <xsl:param name="url"/>
>+<xsl:param name="root"/>
> <xsl:param name="chosenlanguage"/>
> <xsl:param name="defaultlanguage"/>
>
> <xsl:variable name="path-to-context"><xsl:call-template
>name="create-path-to-context"/></xsl:variable>
>-<xsl:variable name="root" select="$path-to-context"/>
>
> <xsl:template name="create-path-to-context">
> <xsl:param name="local-url" select="$url"/>
>
>Shall I check that fix in and gregor includes it in his tarball for
>lenya-1.2.5?
>
>
+1 for checking in the patch into SVN, but I think Gregor should make a
new tarball from
the most recent version of the 1.2.x branch with a clearly defined
revision number which the tarball is based on.
Cheers
Michael
>Jann
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Jann Forrer <ja...@id.uzh.ch>.
Jann Forrer wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>>>> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
>>>>> gang,
>>>>>
>>>>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5
>>>>> release,
>>>>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>>>>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>>>>> months.
>>>>>
>>>>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>>>>
>>>>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
>>>> +1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
>>>> branch.
>>> I tested the basic functionality now.
>>>
>>> +1 to vote again for a release.
>> ok, lets try again:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>>
>> has the exact same tarballs from last time.
>
> I did test the most important feature. I found one important bug:
>
> If I change the proxy settings in publication.xconf the urls are
> corectlly rewritten in the content area but not the menu i.e. if i use
> the following proxy entry:
>
> <proxy area="live" ssl="false" url="http://idlnxjaf.unizh.ch/default"/>
>
> I end up with a link like:
> http://idlnxjaf.unizh.ch/default/tutorial/abc.html
> in the content area but the link in the menu entry looks like:
> http://localhost:8080/lenya/default/live/tutorial/abc.html
>
> Can somebody confirm this? If yes that should be fixed imo before a
> 1.2.5 relaease.
>
I found the problem. The parameter root is defined in navigation.xmap
and refined in sitetree2nav.xsl. Changing sitetree2nav.xsl as follows
fixes this problem:
Index: sitetree2nav.xsl
===================================================================
--- sitetree2nav.xsl (revision 501784)
+++ sitetree2nav.xsl (working copy)
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
>
<xsl:param name="url"/>
+<xsl:param name="root"/>
<xsl:param name="chosenlanguage"/>
<xsl:param name="defaultlanguage"/>
<xsl:variable name="path-to-context"><xsl:call-template
name="create-path-to-context"/></xsl:variable>
-<xsl:variable name="root" select="$path-to-context"/>
<xsl:template name="create-path-to-context">
<xsl:param name="local-url" select="$url"/>
Shall I check that fix in and gregor includes it in his tarball for
lenya-1.2.5?
Jann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Jann Forrer <ja...@id.uzh.ch>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>>> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
>>>> gang,
>>>>
>>>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5
>>>> release,
>>>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>>>
>>>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>>>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>>>> months.
>>>>
>>>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>>>
>>>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
>>> +1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
>>> branch.
>>
>> I tested the basic functionality now.
>>
>> +1 to vote again for a release.
>
> ok, lets try again:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>
> has the exact same tarballs from last time.
I did test the most important feature. I found one important bug:
If I change the proxy settings in publication.xconf the urls are
corectlly rewritten in the content area but not the menu i.e. if i use
the following proxy entry:
<proxy area="live" ssl="false" url="http://idlnxjaf.unizh.ch/default"/>
I end up with a link like:
http://idlnxjaf.unizh.ch/default/tutorial/abc.html
in the content area but the link in the menu entry looks like:
http://localhost:8080/lenya/default/live/tutorial/abc.html
Can somebody confirm this? If yes that should be fixed imo before a
1.2.5 relaease.
Jann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 08:28 +0100, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:19 -0500, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> > Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > > Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
> > >> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
> > >>> gang,
> > >>>
> > >>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
> > >>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
> > >>>
> > >>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
> > >>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
> > >>> months.
> > >>>
> > >>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
> > >>>
> > >>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
> > >> +1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
> > >> branch.
> > >
> > > I tested the basic functionality now.
> > >
> > > +1 to vote again for a release.
> >
> > ok, lets try again:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
> >
> > has the exact same tarballs from last time.
>
> Thanks very much Gregor, will test this weekend.
Test apache-lenya-1.2.5-src.tar.gz:
I needed to
1) chmod +x build.sh
2) chmod +x lenya.sh
I tested all basic functionality.
Beside 1 and 2 (I think this should come from the tar ball) my
+1
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:19 -0500, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
> >> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
> >>> gang,
> >>>
> >>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
> >>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
> >>>
> >>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
> >>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
> >>> months.
> >>>
> >>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
> >>>
> >>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
> >> +1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
> >> branch.
> >
> > I tested the basic functionality now.
> >
> > +1 to vote again for a release.
>
> ok, lets try again:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
>
> has the exact same tarballs from last time.
Thanks very much Gregor, will test this weekend.
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
lets try again [Re: release situation]
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
>>> gang,
>>>
>>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
>>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>>
>>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>>> months.
>>>
>>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>>
>>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
>> +1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
>> branch.
>
> I tested the basic functionality now.
>
> +1 to vote again for a release.
ok, lets try again:
http://people.apache.org/~gregor/
has the exact same tarballs from last time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
>> gang,
>>
>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>
>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>> months.
>>
>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>
>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
>
> +1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
> branch.
I tested the basic functionality now.
+1 to vote again for a release.
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss schrieb:
> gang,
>
> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>
> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
> months.
>
> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>
> a) we try again with 1.2.5
+1, but I have to admit that I don't have the time for testing this
branch.
> b) we retire the 1.2 branch
I don't think we should retire it officially, not until we
gained the credibility that we manage to do regular releases
of the 1.4 branch.
> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
+1 for an RC.
I'll send another status update, then the devs can decide if
it is the time to do an RC now.
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gr...@apache.org>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
>> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
>
> you mean a RC?
don't care too much what we call it as long as we release *something* soon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Jann Forrer <ja...@id.uzh.ch>.
Michael Wechner wrote:
> Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> gang,
>>
>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5
>> release, and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>
>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>> months.
>>
>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>
>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
>
>
> +1
>
+1 becasue the 1.2 Branch is still recommended for a productive system.
>> b) we retire the 1.2 branch
>
-1 see above!
>
> I would definitely first do (a) because it contains some improvements
> and hence would be kind of lost
>
>> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
>
>
> you mean a RC?
>
+1
Jann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> gang,
>
> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5
> release, and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>
> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
> months.
>
> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>
> a) we try again with 1.2.5
+1
> b) we retire the 1.2 branch
I would definitely first do (a) because it contains some improvements
and hence would be kind of lost
> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
you mean a RC?
Cheers
Michi
>
> i think we should do a, followed by b and c.
>
> other ideas, comments?
>
> -gregor
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>
>>> other ideas, comments?
>>>
>>
> +1 to all. Except b) should be *after* we set 1.4 as the stable release.
+1 for the "except" and additionally people get a "hint" how to upgrade
from 1.2 to 1.4
Cheers
Michi
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Antonio Gallardo.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 14:27 +0100, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
>> gang,
>>
>> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
>> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>>
>> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
>> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
>> months.
>>
>
>
> I am sorry that I could not give you feedback when you did the rc. I had
> no internet at home and at work I ATM working with other products.
>
>
>> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>>
>> a) we try again with 1.2.5
>>
>
> +1
>
> I volunteer to do the linux testing.
>
>
>> b) we retire the 1.2 branch
>>
>
> IMO we can talk about it when we have a stable 1.4 version released,
> before we cannot retire 1.2.
>
>
>> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
>>
>>
>
> +1
>
>
>> i think we should do a, followed by b and c.
>>
>>
>
> IMO should be a) c) and then b).
>
>
>> other ideas, comments?
>>
+1 to all. Except b) should be *after* we set 1.4 as the stable release.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: release situation
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 14:27 +0100, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> gang,
>
> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release,
> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
>
> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is
> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18
> months.
I am sorry that I could not give you feedback when you did the rc. I had
no internet at home and at work I ATM working with other products.
>
> i see a couple possible scenarios:
>
> a) we try again with 1.2.5
+1
I volunteer to do the linux testing.
> b) we retire the 1.2 branch
IMO we can talk about it when we have a stable 1.4 version released,
before we cannot retire 1.2.
> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
>
+1
> i think we should do a, followed by b and c.
>
IMO should be a) c) and then b).
> other ideas, comments?
>
Thanks Gregor for your continuous efforts to pursue this topic.
salu2
> -gregor
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org