You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2007/07/01 02:00:43 UTC
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
SCA Java Project
|
|--- SCA related Documents
SDO Java Project
|
|--- SDO related Documents
DAS Java Project
|
|--- DAS related Documents
Infrastructure
|
|--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
Website
|
|--- Website related documents and old website copy
Thoughts ?
On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web site. As Venkat
> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and preview
> > proposed
> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create a new
> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete copy of the
> > > web
> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where the
> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > >
> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI. I would
> > have
> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for "main site
> > > pages
> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an organization of
> > our
> > > choosing.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's a wiki so
> if you don't like it....
>
> Simon
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I understand the purpose, but I also understand that the ACL of
the website has changed since that time, that's why I was proposing
move it to the regular wiki, where more people would have access to
contribute to these documents. And yes, if we feel these documents
are ready to be published to the website, we should link them from the
documentation page and move them out of the "work in progress" page.
On 7/6/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Purpose of the 'work in progress folder' was just what you mentioned below.
> It's been a while since that folder was created. Perhaps we should look at
> the content and figure out what is mature enough to be added to the website
> before we move everything back to TuscanyWiki.
>
> On 7/6/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Following a related topic, should we move all the "work in progress"
> > documents that are child pages from [1] from the website to the wiki.
> > I think this would allow for more collaboration and help from other
> > members of the community.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+Work-In-Progress
> >
> > On 7/2/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 That's what I was thinking about... sorry if it was causing any
> > confusion...
> > >
> > > On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 7/2/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole'
> > website
> > > > > on
> > > > > TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who
> > are
> > > > > not
> > > > > committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the
> > wiki
> > > > > before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I
> > could
> > > > > not
> > > > > see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related
> > documentation
> > > > > for
> > > > > each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two
> > > > > categories
> > > > > under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress
> > > > > It would be good to maintain this for clarity.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
> > > > > > Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to
> > this,
> > > > > > but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level,
> > and
> > > > > > for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level.
> > The
> > > > > > main goal here is group related information together in a
> > organized
> > > > > > way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level
> > of
> > > > > > the tuscanywiki.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but
> > not
> > > > > > many content, other then the copy of the old website is available
> > as
> > > > > > of now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Luciano,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems
> > to
> > > > > > > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" /
> > "SDO"
> > > > > > > perspective - is that right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> > > > > > > TuscanyWiki psace...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yours, Mike.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one
> > described
> > > > > > > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find
> > related
> > > > > > > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep
> > hierarchy, and
> > > > > > > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name
> > (e.g
> > > > > > > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > SCA Java Project
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > |--- SCA related Documents
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > SDO Java Project
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > |--- SDO related Documents
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > DAS Java Project
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > |--- DAS related Documents
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Infrastructure
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Website
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web
> > > > > site. As
> > > > > > > >> Venkat
> > > > > > > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and
> > > > > preview
> > > > > > > >> > proposed
> > > > > > > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to
> > create
> > > > > a
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > > > > > > >> >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > > > > > > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Simon
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the
> > complete
> > > > > copy
> > > > > > > >> of the
> > > > > > > >> > > web
> > > > > > > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear
> > where
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of
> > TUSCANYWIKI.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > >> would
> > > > > > > >> > have
> > > > > > > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI
> > for
> > > > > "main
> > > > > > > >> site
> > > > > > > >> > > pages
> > > > > > > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> > > > > > > >> organization of
> > > > > > > >> > our
> > > > > > > >> > > choosing.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Regards
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Simon
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But
> > it's
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > >> wiki so
> > > > > > > >> if you don't like it....
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Simon
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > There is a manual copy of the website on the wiki - see the
> > link"Tuscany
> > > > Website Pages In
> > > > Preparation<
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Manual+Copy+Of+The+Tuscany+Website
> > >"
> > > > at the bottom of the wiki front page (
> > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home). I think
> > that
> > > > that is an apporpriate place to do web page preparation work.
> > > >
> > > > What I thought Luciano was proposing was a simple organization of any
> > wiki
> > > > pages that are not intended to be part of the web site. It's very
> > useful to
> > > > have the wiki space for creating arbitrary pages where we can record
> > > > information about ongoing work. This doesn't mean these pages will
> > ever
> > > > necessarily make it to the web site.
> > > >
> > > > Simon
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com>.
Purpose of the 'work in progress folder' was just what you mentioned below.
It's been a while since that folder was created. Perhaps we should look at
the content and figure out what is mature enough to be added to the website
before we move everything back to TuscanyWiki.
On 7/6/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Following a related topic, should we move all the "work in progress"
> documents that are child pages from [1] from the website to the wiki.
> I think this would allow for more collaboration and help from other
> members of the community.
>
> [1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+Work-In-Progress
>
> On 7/2/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 That's what I was thinking about... sorry if it was causing any
> confusion...
> >
> > On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > On 7/2/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole'
> website
> > > > on
> > > > TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who
> are
> > > > not
> > > > committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the
> wiki
> > > > before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I
> could
> > > > not
> > > > see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things.
> > > >
> > > > Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related
> documentation
> > > > for
> > > > each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two
> > > > categories
> > > > under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress
> > > > It would be good to maintain this for clarity.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
> > > > > Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to
> this,
> > > > > but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level,
> and
> > > > > for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level.
> The
> > > > > main goal here is group related information together in a
> organized
> > > > > way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level
> of
> > > > > the tuscanywiki.
> > > > >
> > > > > The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but
> not
> > > > > many content, other then the copy of the old website is available
> as
> > > > > of now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Luciano,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems
> to
> > > > > > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" /
> "SDO"
> > > > > > perspective - is that right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> > > > > > TuscanyWiki psace...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yours, Mike.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > > > > > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one
> described
> > > > > > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find
> related
> > > > > > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep
> hierarchy, and
> > > > > > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name
> (e.g
> > > > > > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SCA Java Project
> > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > |--- SCA related Documents
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SDO Java Project
> > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > |--- SDO related Documents
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > DAS Java Project
> > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > |--- DAS related Documents
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Infrastructure
> > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Website
> > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web
> > > > site. As
> > > > > > >> Venkat
> > > > > > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and
> > > > preview
> > > > > > >> > proposed
> > > > > > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to
> create
> > > > a
> > > > > new
> > > > > > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > > > > > >> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > > > > > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Simon
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the
> complete
> > > > copy
> > > > > > >> of the
> > > > > > >> > > web
> > > > > > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear
> where
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of
> TUSCANYWIKI.
> > > > I
> > > > > > >> would
> > > > > > >> > have
> > > > > > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI
> for
> > > > "main
> > > > > > >> site
> > > > > > >> > > pages
> > > > > > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> > > > > > >> organization of
> > > > > > >> > our
> > > > > > >> > > choosing.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Regards
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Simon
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But
> it's
> > > > a
> > > > > > >> wiki so
> > > > > > >> if you don't like it....
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Simon
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > There is a manual copy of the website on the wiki - see the
> link"Tuscany
> > > Website Pages In
> > > Preparation<
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Manual+Copy+Of+The+Tuscany+Website
> >"
> > > at the bottom of the wiki front page (
> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home). I think
> that
> > > that is an apporpriate place to do web page preparation work.
> > >
> > > What I thought Luciano was proposing was a simple organization of any
> wiki
> > > pages that are not intended to be part of the web site. It's very
> useful to
> > > have the wiki space for creating arbitrary pages where we can record
> > > information about ongoing work. This doesn't mean these pages will
> ever
> > > necessarily make it to the web site.
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Following a related topic, should we move all the "work in progress"
documents that are child pages from [1] from the website to the wiki.
I think this would allow for more collaboration and help from other
members of the community.
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+Work-In-Progress
On 7/2/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 That's what I was thinking about... sorry if it was causing any confusion...
>
> On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/2/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole' website
> > > on
> > > TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who are
> > > not
> > > committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the wiki
> > > before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I could
> > > not
> > > see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things.
> > >
> > > Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related documentation
> > > for
> > > each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two
> > > categories
> > > under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress
> > > It would be good to maintain this for clarity.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
> > > > Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to this,
> > > > but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level, and
> > > > for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level. The
> > > > main goal here is group related information together in a organized
> > > > way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level of
> > > > the tuscanywiki.
> > > >
> > > > The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but not
> > > > many content, other then the copy of the old website is available as
> > > > of now.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > > On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Luciano,
> > > > >
> > > > > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems to
> > > > > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / "SDO"
> > > > > perspective - is that right?
> > > > >
> > > > > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> > > > > TuscanyWiki psace...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours, Mike.
> > > > >
> > > > > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > > > > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> > > > > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> > > > > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> > > > > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> > > > > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SCA Java Project
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > |--- SCA related Documents
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SDO Java Project
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > |--- SDO related Documents
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DAS Java Project
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > |--- DAS related Documents
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Infrastructure
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Website
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web
> > > site. As
> > > > > >> Venkat
> > > > > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and
> > > preview
> > > > > >> > proposed
> > > > > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create
> > > a
> > > > new
> > > > > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > > > > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > > > > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Simon
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete
> > > copy
> > > > > >> of the
> > > > > >> > > web
> > > > > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI.
> > > I
> > > > > >> would
> > > > > >> > have
> > > > > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for
> > > "main
> > > > > >> site
> > > > > >> > > pages
> > > > > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> > > > > >> organization of
> > > > > >> > our
> > > > > >> > > choosing.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Regards
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Simon
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's
> > > a
> > > > > >> wiki so
> > > > > >> if you don't like it....
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Simon
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > There is a manual copy of the website on the wiki - see the link"Tuscany
> > Website Pages In
> > Preparation<http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Manual+Copy+Of+The+Tuscany+Website>"
> > at the bottom of the wiki front page (
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home). I think that
> > that is an apporpriate place to do web page preparation work.
> >
> > What I thought Luciano was proposing was a simple organization of any wiki
> > pages that are not intended to be part of the web site. It's very useful to
> > have the wiki space for creating arbitrary pages where we can record
> > information about ongoing work. This doesn't mean these pages will ever
> > necessarily make it to the web site.
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
+1 That's what I was thinking about... sorry if it was causing any confusion...
On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 7/2/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole' website
> > on
> > TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who are
> > not
> > committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the wiki
> > before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I could
> > not
> > see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things.
> >
> > Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related documentation
> > for
> > each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two
> > categories
> > under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress
> > It would be good to maintain this for clarity.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
> > > Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to this,
> > > but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level, and
> > > for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level. The
> > > main goal here is group related information together in a organized
> > > way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level of
> > > the tuscanywiki.
> > >
> > > The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but not
> > > many content, other then the copy of the old website is available as
> > > of now.
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Luciano,
> > > >
> > > > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems to
> > > > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / "SDO"
> > > > perspective - is that right?
> > > >
> > > > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> > > > TuscanyWiki psace...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yours, Mike.
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > > > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> > > > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> > > > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> > > > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> > > > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> > > > >
> > > > > SCA Java Project
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--- SCA related Documents
> > > > >
> > > > > SDO Java Project
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--- SDO related Documents
> > > > >
> > > > > DAS Java Project
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--- DAS related Documents
> > > > >
> > > > > Infrastructure
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> > > > >
> > > > > Website
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web
> > site. As
> > > > >> Venkat
> > > > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and
> > preview
> > > > >> > proposed
> > > > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create
> > a
> > > new
> > > > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > > > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > > > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Simon
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete
> > copy
> > > > >> of the
> > > > >> > > web
> > > > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where
> > > the
> > > > >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI.
> > I
> > > > >> would
> > > > >> > have
> > > > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for
> > "main
> > > > >> site
> > > > >> > > pages
> > > > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> > > > >> organization of
> > > > >> > our
> > > > >> > > choosing.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Regards
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Simon
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's
> > a
> > > > >> wiki so
> > > > >> if you don't like it....
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Simon
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> There is a manual copy of the website on the wiki - see the link"Tuscany
> Website Pages In
> Preparation<http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Manual+Copy+Of+The+Tuscany+Website>"
> at the bottom of the wiki front page (
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home). I think that
> that is an apporpriate place to do web page preparation work.
>
> What I thought Luciano was proposing was a simple organization of any wiki
> pages that are not intended to be part of the web site. It's very useful to
> have the wiki space for creating arbitrary pages where we can record
> information about ongoing work. This doesn't mean these pages will ever
> necessarily make it to the web site.
>
> Simon
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/2/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole' website
> on
> TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who are
> not
> committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the wiki
> before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I could
> not
> see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things.
>
> Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related documentation
> for
> each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two
> categories
> under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress
> It would be good to maintain this for clarity.
>
>
>
> On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
> > Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to this,
> > but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level, and
> > for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level. The
> > main goal here is group related information together in a organized
> > way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level of
> > the tuscanywiki.
> >
> > The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but not
> > many content, other then the copy of the old website is available as
> > of now.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Luciano,
> > >
> > > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems to
> > > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / "SDO"
> > > perspective - is that right?
> > >
> > > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> > > TuscanyWiki psace...
> > >
> > >
> > > Yours, Mike.
> > >
> > > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> > > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> > > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> > > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> > > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> > > >
> > > > SCA Java Project
> > > > |
> > > > |--- SCA related Documents
> > > >
> > > > SDO Java Project
> > > > |
> > > > |--- SDO related Documents
> > > >
> > > > DAS Java Project
> > > > |
> > > > |--- DAS related Documents
> > > >
> > > > Infrastructure
> > > > |
> > > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> > > >
> > > > Website
> > > > |
> > > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web
> site. As
> > > >> Venkat
> > > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and
> preview
> > > >> > proposed
> > > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create
> a
> > new
> > > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Simon
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete
> copy
> > > >> of the
> > > >> > > web
> > > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where
> > the
> > > >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI.
> I
> > > >> would
> > > >> > have
> > > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for
> "main
> > > >> site
> > > >> > > pages
> > > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> > > >> organization of
> > > >> > our
> > > >> > > choosing.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Regards
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Simon
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's
> a
> > > >> wiki so
> > > >> if you don't like it....
> > > >>
> > > >> Simon
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
There is a manual copy of the website on the wiki - see the link"Tuscany
Website Pages In
Preparation<http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Manual+Copy+Of+The+Tuscany+Website>"
at the bottom of the wiki front page (
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home). I think that
that is an apporpriate place to do web page preparation work.
What I thought Luciano was proposing was a simple organization of any wiki
pages that are not intended to be part of the web site. It's very useful to
have the wiki space for creating arbitrary pages where we can record
information about ongoing work. This doesn't mean these pages will ever
necessarily make it to the web site.
Simon
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com>.
I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole' website on
TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who are not
committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the wiki
before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I could not
see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things.
Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related documentation for
each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two categories
under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress
It would be good to maintain this for clarity.
On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
> Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to this,
> but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level, and
> for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level. The
> main goal here is group related information together in a organized
> way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level of
> the tuscanywiki.
>
> The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but not
> many content, other then the copy of the old website is available as
> of now.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Luciano,
> >
> > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems to
> > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / "SDO"
> > perspective - is that right?
> >
> > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> > TuscanyWiki psace...
> >
> >
> > Yours, Mike.
> >
> > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> > >
> > > SCA Java Project
> > > |
> > > |--- SCA related Documents
> > >
> > > SDO Java Project
> > > |
> > > |--- SDO related Documents
> > >
> > > DAS Java Project
> > > |
> > > |--- DAS related Documents
> > >
> > > Infrastructure
> > > |
> > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> > >
> > > Website
> > > |
> > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web site. As
> > >> Venkat
> > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and preview
> > >> > proposed
> > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create a
> new
> > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> > >> >
> > >> > Simon
> > >> >
> > >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete copy
> > >> of the
> > >> > > web
> > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where
> the
> > >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI. I
> > >> would
> > >> > have
> > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for "main
> > >> site
> > >> > > pages
> > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> > >> organization of
> > >> > our
> > >> > > choosing.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Simon
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's a
> > >> wiki so
> > >> if you don't like it....
> > >>
> > >> Simon
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java
Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to this,
but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level, and
for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level. The
main goal here is group related information together in a organized
way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level of
the tuscanywiki.
The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but not
many content, other then the copy of the old website is available as
of now.
Thoughts ?
On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Luciano,
>
> How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems to
> approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / "SDO"
> perspective - is that right?
>
> It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
> TuscanyWiki psace...
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Luciano Resende wrote:
> > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> > below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> > information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
> >
> > SCA Java Project
> > |
> > |--- SCA related Documents
> >
> > SDO Java Project
> > |
> > |--- SDO related Documents
> >
> > DAS Java Project
> > |
> > |--- DAS related Documents
> >
> > Infrastructure
> > |
> > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
> >
> > Website
> > |
> > |--- Website related documents and old website copy
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web site. As
> >> Venkat
> >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and preview
> >> > proposed
> >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create a new
> >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
> >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
> >> >
> >> > Simon
> >> >
> >> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete copy
> >> of the
> >> > > web
> >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where the
> >> > > definitive source of this material is.
> >> > >
> >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI. I
> >> would
> >> > have
> >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for "main
> >> site
> >> > > pages
> >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
> >> organization of
> >> > our
> >> > > choosing.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Simon
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's a
> >> wiki so
> >> if you don't like it....
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Luciano,
How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems to
approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / "SDO"
perspective - is that right?
It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the
TuscanyWiki psace...
Yours, Mike.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
>
> SCA Java Project
> |
> |--- SCA related Documents
>
> SDO Java Project
> |
> |--- SDO related Documents
>
> DAS Java Project
> |
> |--- DAS related Documents
>
> Infrastructure
> |
> |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
>
> Website
> |
> |--- Website related documents and old website copy
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web site. As
>> Venkat
>> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and preview
>> > proposed
>> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to create a new
>> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page
>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
>> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page.
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>> > Simon Laws wrote:
>> >
>> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the complete copy
>> of the
>> > > web
>> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear where the
>> > > definitive source of this material is.
>> > >
>> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of TUSCANYWIKI. I
>> would
>> > have
>> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI for "main
>> site
>> > > pages
>> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an
>> organization of
>> > our
>> > > choosing.
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > >
>> > > Simon
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But it's a
>> wiki so
>> if you don't like it....
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: How are we going to use the Tuscany Wiki space?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one described
> below to group documents together and make it easier to find related
> information. It's probably good not to have very deep hierarchy, and
> maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name (e.g
> distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc)
>
> SCA Java Project
> |
> |--- SCA related Documents
>
> SDO Java Project
> |
> |--- SDO related Documents
>
> DAS Java Project
> |
> |--- DAS related Documents
>
> Infrastructure
> |
> |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc
>
> Website
> |
> |--- Website related documents and old website copy
>
> Thoughts ?
>
>
Sounds Ok to me. I don't think we need to make it any more complicated than
this single set of groupings in the first instance. Lets see how people use
it.
Simon