You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> on 2013/01/20 12:04:11 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1435815 - /tomee/tomee/trunk/container/openejb-jee-accessors/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/sxc/Sxc.java

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM,  <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> trying to force jvm one

Why is this important?

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
Functional languages (Clojure), Java EE, and IBM WebSphere -
http://blog.japila.pl
"Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how
slow." Plato

Re: svn commit: r1435815 - /tomee/tomee/trunk/container/openejb-jee-accessors/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/sxc/Sxc.java

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

the idea os the classloader switching is to use the jvm one which is fast
(David benched IIRC)

using the newInstance() method has 2 drawbacks:
1) in embedded mode it doesn't work (single big classpath)
2) we go through the SPI mecanism even if 8/10 times we know the result

open to discuss further if you see some reason to not do this change

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



2013/1/20 Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>

> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM,  <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > trying to force jvm one
>
> Why is this important?
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> Functional languages (Clojure), Java EE, and IBM WebSphere -
> http://blog.japila.pl
> "Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how
> slow." Plato
>