You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2011/05/02 09:34:40 UTC

[Bug 4194] X-Spam-Relays-* needs "for" sub-field

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4194

Henrik Krohns <he...@hege.li> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hege@hege.li

--- Comment #4 from Henrik Krohns <he...@hege.li> 2011-05-02 07:34:40 UTC ---
You can make rules to MTA specific headers like X-Original-To, X-Envelope-To,
Apparently-To etc... see PerMsgStatus.pm all_to_addrs(). I doubt we will be
implementing "EnvelopeTo" heuristics.

Then again lots of info is parsed from Received headers, so I'm not sure why
"envto" could not be included.. possibly helping Bayes?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.