You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Oliver Zeigermann <ol...@gmail.com> on 2004/10/12 11:26:31 UTC
Digester and xmlio
Folks,
after fruitful discussion with Simon, I think the core of Digster 2
might be able to offer everything xmlio offers. My idea would be to
keep xmlio in the sandbox for now and see if what Simon has for
Digester 2 really serves everything we need as soon as it is out. If
so we can drop xmlio. Of course I can offer help with the Digester 2
core if this is applicable / wanted.
Daniel, Simon, others, what do you think?
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Digester and xmlio
Posted by Oliver Zeigermann <ol...@gmail.com>.
Would not know where writing to XML should go to. Maybe a component of its own?
Concerning merging concepts, there currently are two things I would
not know how to integrate into Digester:
- sparing a custom stack in many cases where the path object passed
with all call backs serves a generic one
- having all information about simple elements in a single call back
I know Simon is busy now, but maybe we can keep this in mind...
Oliver
P.S.: Simon, good luck to escape your job hell!
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:37:34 +1300, Simon Kitching
<si...@ecnetwork.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 22:26, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > after fruitful discussion with Simon, I think the core of Digster 2
> > might be able to offer everything xmlio offers. My idea would be to
> > keep xmlio in the sandbox for now and see if what Simon has for
> > Digester 2 really serves everything we need as soon as it is out. If
> > so we can drop xmlio. Of course I can offer help with the Digester 2
> > core if this is applicable / wanted.
> >
> > Daniel, Simon, others, what do you think?
>
> This sounds good to me. I will definitely have a go at merging the ideas
> of xmlio into Digester; currently I think we can, without compromising
> the design.
>
> Note however that this only applies to the "xml reading" part of xmlio.
> I don't know what the best thing to do with the "xml writing" part of
> xmlio.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Digester and xmlio
Posted by Simon Kitching <si...@ecnetwork.co.nz>.
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 22:26, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> Folks,
>
> after fruitful discussion with Simon, I think the core of Digster 2
> might be able to offer everything xmlio offers. My idea would be to
> keep xmlio in the sandbox for now and see if what Simon has for
> Digester 2 really serves everything we need as soon as it is out. If
> so we can drop xmlio. Of course I can offer help with the Digester 2
> core if this is applicable / wanted.
>
> Daniel, Simon, others, what do you think?
This sounds good to me. I will definitely have a go at merging the ideas
of xmlio into Digester; currently I think we can, without compromising
the design.
Note however that this only applies to the "xml reading" part of xmlio.
I don't know what the best thing to do with the "xml writing" part of
xmlio.
Cheers,
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org