You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Milamber <mi...@apache.org> on 2016/11/02 21:01:23 UTC
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
I will start the RC1 of 3.1 release tomorrow. Stop me now if I need to wait.
Milamber
On 31/10/2016 23:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>>>
>>> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>>>
>>> I will do it tomorrow
> Done
>
>>> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
>>> that we use
>>>
>>> Done.
>>> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
>>> changes
>>> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
>>> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time
>>> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>>>
>>> Done by Felix
>>> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
>>> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
>>> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
>>> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>>>
>>>
> Should we do that ?
>
>
>
> Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent
> features to new comers and old users.
> It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve.
>
>>>
>>> Bon courage !
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Milamber,
>>>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented
>>>> like this in my opinion.
>>>> It is a medium to major release:
>>>>
>>>> - 54 Enhancements
>>>> - 28 Bug fixes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>>>
>>>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>>>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
>>>> now available in Report
>>>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big
>>>> images... I think it's important to highlight
>>>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>>>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon
>>>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features
>>>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>>>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
>>>> *:
>>>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>>>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>>>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>>>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>>>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>>>
>>>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
>>>>
>>>> - JSON Extractor
>>>> - UX in CSV Dataset,
>>>> - Sane HTML viewer
>>>> - Performance and memory improvements
>>>> - ....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>>>
>>>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots
>>>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>>>> increase
>>>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumacher@internetallee.de');>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
For me you can proceed.
Thanks in advance.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I will start the RC1 of 3.1 release tomorrow. Stop me now if I need to
> wait.
>
> Milamber
>
> On 31/10/2016 23:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>>>>
>>>> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>>>>
>>>> I will do it tomorrow
>>>>
>>> Done
>>
>> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
>>>> that we use
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
>>>> changes
>>>> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
>>>> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent
>>>> some time
>>>> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>>>>
>>>> Done by Felix
>>>> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
>>>> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
>>>> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
>>>> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should we do that ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent
>> features to new comers and old users.
>> It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve.
>>
>>
>>>> Bon courage !
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Milamber,
>>>>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented
>>>>> like this in my opinion.
>>>>> It is a medium to major release:
>>>>>
>>>>> - 54 Enhancements
>>>>> - 28 Bug fixes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>>>>
>>>>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>>>>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version
>>>>> and
>>>>> now available in Report
>>>>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big
>>>>> images... I think it's important to highlight
>>>>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>>>>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon
>>>>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features
>>>>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>>>>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that
>>>>> before 31/10) *AND
>>>>> *:
>>>>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>>>>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>>>>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>>>>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>>>>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice
>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>
>>>>> - JSON Extractor
>>>>> - UX in CSV Dataset,
>>>>> - Sane HTML viewer
>>>>> - Performance and memory improvements
>>>>> - ....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots
>>>>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>>>>> increase
>>>>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> ');>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>>>> ');>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.