You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by "Dallas L. Engelken" <da...@nmgi.com> on 2004/07/26 17:02:53 UTC

spamd responded with bad string

Where does the 'PR' and 'P' prefixes come from in the SPAMD response??
I don't see anywhere in spamd.raw where it prints anything but SPAMD/1.X

Is spamc reading the SPAMD response incorrectly?

[root@mail1 root]# tail -f /var/log/maillog
Jul 26 09:15:16 mail1 spamc[5853]: spamd responded with bad string
'PRSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:16 mail1 spamc[6043]: spamd responded with bad string
'PRSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:16 mail1 spamc[5993]: spamd responded with bad string
'PRSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:21 mail1 spamc[6370]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:23 mail1 spamc[6432]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:23 mail1 spamc[6422]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:25 mail1 spamc[6477]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:26 mail1 spamc[6598]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:15:32 mail1 spamc[6862]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'
Jul 26 09:22:27 mail1 spamc[14084]: spamd responded with bad string
'PSPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK'

D

Re: spamd responded with bad string

Posted by "Malte S. Stretz" <ms...@gmx.net>.

On Monday 26 July 2004 17:02 CET Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> Where does the 'PR' and 'P' prefixes come from in the SPAMD response??
> I don't see anywhere in spamd.raw where it prints anything but SPAMD/1.X

No idea, never seen that.  But it would be cool to know which version that 
is and if it happens for every mail.

Cheers,
Malte

-- 
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
      <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
      <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>

Re: spamd responded with bad string

Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.

On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:02:53AM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> Where does the 'PR' and 'P' prefixes come from in the SPAMD response??
> I don't see anywhere in spamd.raw where it prints anything but SPAMD/1.X
> 

Shot in the dark, I wonder if it's some sort of corruption thing.
Could the 'PR' or 'P' be from the sent PROCESS command?

Michael