You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2006/03/05 00:46:39 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-1690
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: Sachin Patel
Assigned to: Aaron Mulder
Fix For: 1.1
>From an earlier dev list note...
1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
do in case of non-unique names.
3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1690:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: patch.txt
Patch provides fix for distribute command to pass in target to deployer gbean. Aaron, please review and give me thumbs up/down for me to commit.
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: New Feature
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Assignee: Aaron Mulder
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516583 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1690:
----------------------------------------
Isn't this complete?
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Wish List
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=comments#action_12368912 ]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-1690:
----------------------------------------
This is needed for the eclipse-plugin as in furture versions will deploy to a different config-store implementation that allows resources to be loaded directly from eclipse workspace, thus avoiding the overhead of extracting and deploying an archive on every publish.
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: New Feature
> Components: deployment
> Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Assignee: Aaron Mulder
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1690:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: Wish List
(was: 1.2)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Wish List
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Aaron Mulder (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1690:
-----------------------------------
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: New Feature
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Assignee: Aaron Mulder
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Matt Hogstrom (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1690:
------------------------------------
Fix Version: 1.1.1
(was: 1.1)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: New Feature
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Assignee: Aaron Mulder
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1.1
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Aaron Mulder (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1690:
-----------------------------------
Assign To: (was: Aaron Mulder)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: New Feature
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1.1
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1690:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.2
(was: 1.1.1)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.2
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1690:
-----------------------------------
Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature)
Priority: Minor (was: Critical)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Wish List
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets
passed into JSR88
Posted by "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=comments#action_12421172 ]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-1690:
----------------------------------------
I think this is on the 1.1.1 list because of the attached patch which is already committed and so the core of the problem (1) is fixed. I think its ok to move 2&3 our to a future release. as these I would not consider critical for 1.1.1.
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1690
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Sachin Patel
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.2
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument.
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line.
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira