You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Norman Maurer <nm...@byteaction.de> on 2006/04/21 10:04:15 UTC

Re: [jira] Resolved: (JAMES-477) Configure option to disable heloEhloEnforcement to be compatible with james < 2.3.0

Sounds ok for me.

bye

Am Freitag, den 21.04.2006, 10:02 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > Should we maybe throw a exception if someone has set <checkValidHelo>
> > true </checkValidHelo> but has <heloEhloEnforcement> false
> > </heloEhloEnforcement>  set too ? 
> > Otherwise this check cann simple passed by not sending a helo/ehlo at
> > all.
> > 
> > What you guys think ?
> 
> Maybe an info log saying that the checkValidHelo is true but 
> heloEhloEnforcement is false is enough.
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> 
> !EXCUBATOR:1,4448925637023644411865!