You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org> on 2021/02/16 19:24:52 UTC
[VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.12.2,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
* website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement blog
post [6].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Regards,
Roman
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
[5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
[6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org>.
The artifacts removed.
Thanks everybody for taking part in the verification.
Regards,
Roman
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:21 PM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Piotr,
>
> The RC-1 is therefore cancelled.
> I'll remove the artifacts and create a new RC once the issue is resolved.
>
> Regards,
> Roman
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:57 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ops, sorry I've linked the wrong issue in the previous email. This is the
>> correct one:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21453
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> wt., 23 lut 2021 o 11:56 Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> I need to unfortunately change my vote to -1 because of the bug that was
>>> introduced in 1.12.2:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19462
>>>
>>> Luckily this seems to be an easy fix.
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>> sob., 20 lut 2021 o 15:42 Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> * build from source
>>>> * Verified some Kubernetes related fixes and improvements
>>>> * FLINK-20944 - Launching application mode with ClusterIP
>>>> * FLINK-20417 - Handle "Too old resource version" exception in
>>>> Kubernetes
>>>> watch more gracefully
>>>> * FLINK-20359 - Support adding Owner Reference to Job Manager in
>>>> native
>>>> kubernetes setup
>>>> * Start a standalone job cluster, check the webUI and logs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Yang
>>>>
>>>> Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> 于2021年2月20日周六 下午3:23写道：
>>>>
>>>> > +1 (binding)
>>>> >
>>>> > - Checked the diff between 1.12.1 and 1.12.2: OK (
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.12.1...release-1.12.2-rc1
>>>> > )
>>>> > - jackson version has been bumped to 2.10.5.1 through FLINK-21020
>>>> and all
>>>> > NOTICE files updated correctly
>>>> > - beanutils version has been bumped to 1.9.4 through FLINK-21123
>>>> and all
>>>> > NOTICE files updated correctly
>>>> > - testcontainer version has been bumped to 1.15.1 through
>>>> FLINK-21277 and
>>>> > no NOTICE files impact
>>>> > - japicmp version has been bumped to 1.12.1 and no NOTICE files
>>>> impact
>>>> > - Checked release notes: OK
>>>> > - Checked sums and signatures: OK
>>>> > - Maven clean install from source: OK
>>>> > - Checked the jars in the staging repo: OK
>>>> > - Checked binary archive: OK
>>>> > - Approved the website updates (left some notes in PR)
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks a lot for putting the RC together!
>>>> >
>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>> > Yu
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > - verified checksums & signatures
>>>> > > - reviewed website PR
>>>> > > - build from source
>>>> > > - run example jobs
>>>> > > - standalone session & yarn per-job
>>>> > > - jobs work as expected
>>>> > > - ui & logs look good
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thank you~
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Xintong Song
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <
>>>> pnowojski@apache.org>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Hi,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > +1 from my side
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues
>>>> and I
>>>> > > can
>>>> > > > confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last
>>>> couple of
>>>> > > > weeks.
>>>> > > > 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are
>>>> two
>>>> > > > blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being
>>>> merged
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > > they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been
>>>> present in
>>>> > the
>>>> > > > past release already.
>>>> > > > 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between
>>>> > 1.12.1
>>>> > > > and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from
>>>> 1.9.3
>>>> > to
>>>> > > > 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Piotrek
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>> napisał(a):
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > Hey Roman,
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Thanks for preparing RC1!
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > +1 from my side.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
>>>> > > > > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
>>>> > > > > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
>>>> > > > > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
>>>> > > > > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local
>>>> Flink
>>>> > > > cluster,
>>>> > > > > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
>>>> > > > suspicious
>>>> > > > > output
>>>> > > > > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the
>>>> binary
>>>> > > > release
>>>> > > > > as well
>>>> > > > > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an
>>>> Apache
>>>> > > > > License file and a NOTICE file are included
>>>> > > > > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release
>>>> (Flink
>>>> > > > > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to
>>>> double
>>>> > > > confirm
>>>> > > > > this).
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Best
>>>> > > > > Yuan
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <
>>>> roman@apache.org>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Hi everyone,
>>>> > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>>> version
>>>> > > > > 1.12.2,
>>>> > > > > > as follows:
>>>> > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>> > comments)
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> > > includes:
>>>> > > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> > > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>> > releases
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > be
>>>> > > > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
>>>> key
>>>> > with
>>>> > > > > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
>>>> > > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>> Repository [4],
>>>> > > > > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
>>>> > > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>> > > announcement
>>>> > > > > > blog post [6].
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> > > majority
>>>> > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Regards,
>>>> > > > > > Roman
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > [1]
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
>>>> > > > > > [2]
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
>>>> > > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> > > > > > [4]
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
>>>> > > > > > [5]
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
>>>> > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org>.
Thanks Piotr,
The RC-1 is therefore cancelled.
I'll remove the artifacts and create a new RC once the issue is resolved.
Regards,
Roman
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:57 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ops, sorry I've linked the wrong issue in the previous email. This is the
> correct one:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21453
>
> Piotrek
>
> wt., 23 lut 2021 o 11:56 Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> -1
>>
>> I need to unfortunately change my vote to -1 because of the bug that was
>> introduced in 1.12.2:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19462
>>
>> Luckily this seems to be an easy fix.
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> sob., 20 lut 2021 o 15:42 Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> * build from source
>>> * Verified some Kubernetes related fixes and improvements
>>> * FLINK-20944 - Launching application mode with ClusterIP
>>> * FLINK-20417 - Handle "Too old resource version" exception in
>>> Kubernetes
>>> watch more gracefully
>>> * FLINK-20359 - Support adding Owner Reference to Job Manager in native
>>> kubernetes setup
>>> * Start a standalone job cluster, check the webUI and logs
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yang
>>>
>>> Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> 于2021年2月20日周六 下午3:23写道：
>>>
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > - Checked the diff between 1.12.1 and 1.12.2: OK (
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.12.1...release-1.12.2-rc1
>>> > )
>>> > - jackson version has been bumped to 2.10.5.1 through FLINK-21020
>>> and all
>>> > NOTICE files updated correctly
>>> > - beanutils version has been bumped to 1.9.4 through FLINK-21123 and
>>> all
>>> > NOTICE files updated correctly
>>> > - testcontainer version has been bumped to 1.15.1 through
>>> FLINK-21277 and
>>> > no NOTICE files impact
>>> > - japicmp version has been bumped to 1.12.1 and no NOTICE files
>>> impact
>>> > - Checked release notes: OK
>>> > - Checked sums and signatures: OK
>>> > - Maven clean install from source: OK
>>> > - Checked the jars in the staging repo: OK
>>> > - Checked binary archive: OK
>>> > - Approved the website updates (left some notes in PR)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks a lot for putting the RC together!
>>> >
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> > Yu
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>>> > >
>>> > > - verified checksums & signatures
>>> > > - reviewed website PR
>>> > > - build from source
>>> > > - run example jobs
>>> > > - standalone session & yarn per-job
>>> > > - jobs work as expected
>>> > > - ui & logs look good
>>> > >
>>> > > Thank you~
>>> > >
>>> > > Xintong Song
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <pnowojski@apache.org
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > +1 from my side
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues
>>> and I
>>> > > can
>>> > > > confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last
>>> couple of
>>> > > > weeks.
>>> > > > 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are
>>> two
>>> > > > blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being
>>> merged
>>> > > and
>>> > > > they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present
>>> in
>>> > the
>>> > > > past release already.
>>> > > > 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between
>>> > 1.12.1
>>> > > > and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from
>>> 1.9.3
>>> > to
>>> > > > 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Piotrek
>>> > > >
>>> > > > pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com>
>>> napisał(a):
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hey Roman,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Thanks for preparing RC1!
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > +1 from my side.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
>>> > > > > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
>>> > > > > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
>>> > > > > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
>>> > > > > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local
>>> Flink
>>> > > > cluster,
>>> > > > > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
>>> > > > suspicious
>>> > > > > output
>>> > > > > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the
>>> binary
>>> > > > release
>>> > > > > as well
>>> > > > > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an
>>> Apache
>>> > > > > License file and a NOTICE file are included
>>> > > > > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release
>>> (Flink
>>> > > > > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to
>>> double
>>> > > > confirm
>>> > > > > this).
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Best
>>> > > > > Yuan
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <
>>> roman@apache.org>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hi everyone,
>>> > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>> version
>>> > > > > 1.12.2,
>>> > > > > > as follows:
>>> > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> > comments)
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> > > includes:
>>> > > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>> > releases
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > be
>>> > > > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
>>> > with
>>> > > > > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
>>> > > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>> [4],
>>> > > > > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
>>> > > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>> > > announcement
>>> > > > > > blog post [6].
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>> > > majority
>>> > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Regards,
>>> > > > > > Roman
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > [1]
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
>>> > > > > > [2]
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
>>> > > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> > > > > > [4]
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
>>> > > > > > [5]
>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
>>> > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>.
Ops, sorry I've linked the wrong issue in the previous email. This is the
correct one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21453
Piotrek
wt., 23 lut 2021 o 11:56 Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):
> -1
>
> I need to unfortunately change my vote to -1 because of the bug that was
> introduced in 1.12.2:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19462
>
> Luckily this seems to be an easy fix.
>
> Piotrek
>
> sob., 20 lut 2021 o 15:42 Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> * build from source
>> * Verified some Kubernetes related fixes and improvements
>> * FLINK-20944 - Launching application mode with ClusterIP
>> * FLINK-20417 - Handle "Too old resource version" exception in
>> Kubernetes
>> watch more gracefully
>> * FLINK-20359 - Support adding Owner Reference to Job Manager in native
>> kubernetes setup
>> * Start a standalone job cluster, check the webUI and logs
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Yang
>>
>> Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> 于2021年2月20日周六 下午3:23写道：
>>
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > - Checked the diff between 1.12.1 and 1.12.2: OK (
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.12.1...release-1.12.2-rc1
>> > )
>> > - jackson version has been bumped to 2.10.5.1 through FLINK-21020 and
>> all
>> > NOTICE files updated correctly
>> > - beanutils version has been bumped to 1.9.4 through FLINK-21123 and
>> all
>> > NOTICE files updated correctly
>> > - testcontainer version has been bumped to 1.15.1 through FLINK-21277
>> and
>> > no NOTICE files impact
>> > - japicmp version has been bumped to 1.12.1 and no NOTICE files impact
>> > - Checked release notes: OK
>> > - Checked sums and signatures: OK
>> > - Maven clean install from source: OK
>> > - Checked the jars in the staging repo: OK
>> > - Checked binary archive: OK
>> > - Approved the website updates (left some notes in PR)
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for putting the RC together!
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yu
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > >
>> > > - verified checksums & signatures
>> > > - reviewed website PR
>> > > - build from source
>> > > - run example jobs
>> > > - standalone session & yarn per-job
>> > > - jobs work as expected
>> > > - ui & logs look good
>> > >
>> > > Thank you~
>> > >
>> > > Xintong Song
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <pn...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 from my side
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues
>> and I
>> > > can
>> > > > confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last couple
>> of
>> > > > weeks.
>> > > > 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are
>> two
>> > > > blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being
>> merged
>> > > and
>> > > > they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present
>> in
>> > the
>> > > > past release already.
>> > > > 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between
>> > 1.12.1
>> > > > and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from
>> 1.9.3
>> > to
>> > > > 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
>> > > >
>> > > > Piotrek
>> > > >
>> > > > pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hey Roman,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks for preparing RC1!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1 from my side.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
>> > > > > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
>> > > > > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
>> > > > > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
>> > > > > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink
>> > > > cluster,
>> > > > > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
>> > > > suspicious
>> > > > > output
>> > > > > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the
>> binary
>> > > > release
>> > > > > as well
>> > > > > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an
>> Apache
>> > > > > License file and a NOTICE file are included
>> > > > > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release
>> (Flink
>> > > > > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double
>> > > > confirm
>> > > > > this).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best
>> > > > > Yuan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <
>> roman@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>> version
>> > > > > 1.12.2,
>> > > > > > as follows:
>> > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> > comments)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> > > includes:
>> > > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>> > releases
>> > > to
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
>> > with
>> > > > > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
>> > > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>> [4],
>> > > > > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
>> > > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>> > > announcement
>> > > > > > blog post [6].
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> > > majority
>> > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > Roman
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
>> > > > > > [2]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
>> > > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> > > > > > [4]
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
>> > > > > > [5]
>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
>> > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Piotr Nowojski <pi...@gmail.com>.
-1
I need to unfortunately change my vote to -1 because of the bug that was
introduced in 1.12.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19462
Luckily this seems to be an easy fix.
Piotrek
sob., 20 lut 2021 o 15:42 Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * build from source
> * Verified some Kubernetes related fixes and improvements
> * FLINK-20944 - Launching application mode with ClusterIP
> * FLINK-20417 - Handle "Too old resource version" exception in Kubernetes
> watch more gracefully
> * FLINK-20359 - Support adding Owner Reference to Job Manager in native
> kubernetes setup
> * Start a standalone job cluster, check the webUI and logs
>
>
> Best,
> Yang
>
> Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> 于2021年2月20日周六 下午3:23写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Checked the diff between 1.12.1 and 1.12.2: OK (
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.12.1...release-1.12.2-rc1
> > )
> > - jackson version has been bumped to 2.10.5.1 through FLINK-21020 and
> all
> > NOTICE files updated correctly
> > - beanutils version has been bumped to 1.9.4 through FLINK-21123 and
> all
> > NOTICE files updated correctly
> > - testcontainer version has been bumped to 1.15.1 through FLINK-21277
> and
> > no NOTICE files impact
> > - japicmp version has been bumped to 1.12.1 and no NOTICE files impact
> > - Checked release notes: OK
> > - Checked sums and signatures: OK
> > - Maven clean install from source: OK
> > - Checked the jars in the staging repo: OK
> > - Checked binary archive: OK
> > - Approved the website updates (left some notes in PR)
> >
> > Thanks a lot for putting the RC together!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > - verified checksums & signatures
> > > - reviewed website PR
> > > - build from source
> > > - run example jobs
> > > - standalone session & yarn per-job
> > > - jobs work as expected
> > > - ui & logs look good
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <pn...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > +1 from my side
> > > >
> > > > 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues
> and I
> > > can
> > > > confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last couple
> of
> > > > weeks.
> > > > 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are two
> > > > blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being
> merged
> > > and
> > > > they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present in
> > the
> > > > past release already.
> > > > 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between
> > 1.12.1
> > > > and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from
> 1.9.3
> > to
> > > > 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
> > > >
> > > > Piotrek
> > > >
> > > > pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Roman,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for preparing RC1!
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 from my side.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
> > > > > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
> > > > > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
> > > > > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
> > > > > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink
> > > > cluster,
> > > > > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
> > > > suspicious
> > > > > output
> > > > > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the binary
> > > > release
> > > > > as well
> > > > > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an
> Apache
> > > > > License file and a NOTICE file are included
> > > > > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release
> (Flink
> > > > > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double
> > > > confirm
> > > > > this).
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Yuan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <
> roman@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> version
> > > > > 1.12.2,
> > > > > > as follows:
> > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > comments)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > includes:
> > > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > releases
> > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> > with
> > > > > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
> > > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> [4],
> > > > > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
> > > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > > announcement
> > > > > > blog post [6].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > > majority
> > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Roman
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
> > > > > > [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
> > > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > [4]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
> > > > > > [5]
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
> > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
* build from source
* Verified some Kubernetes related fixes and improvements
* FLINK-20944 - Launching application mode with ClusterIP
* FLINK-20417 - Handle "Too old resource version" exception in Kubernetes
watch more gracefully
* FLINK-20359 - Support adding Owner Reference to Job Manager in native
kubernetes setup
* Start a standalone job cluster, check the webUI and logs
Best,
Yang
Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> 于2021年2月20日周六 下午3:23写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the diff between 1.12.1 and 1.12.2: OK (
> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.12.1...release-1.12.2-rc1
> )
> - jackson version has been bumped to 2.10.5.1 through FLINK-21020 and all
> NOTICE files updated correctly
> - beanutils version has been bumped to 1.9.4 through FLINK-21123 and all
> NOTICE files updated correctly
> - testcontainer version has been bumped to 1.15.1 through FLINK-21277 and
> no NOTICE files impact
> - japicmp version has been bumped to 1.12.1 and no NOTICE files impact
> - Checked release notes: OK
> - Checked sums and signatures: OK
> - Maven clean install from source: OK
> - Checked the jars in the staging repo: OK
> - Checked binary archive: OK
> - Approved the website updates (left some notes in PR)
>
> Thanks a lot for putting the RC together!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - verified checksums & signatures
> > - reviewed website PR
> > - build from source
> > - run example jobs
> > - standalone session & yarn per-job
> > - jobs work as expected
> > - ui & logs look good
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <pn...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
> > >
> > > +1 from my side
> > >
> > > 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues and I
> > can
> > > confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last couple of
> > > weeks.
> > > 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are two
> > > blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being merged
> > and
> > > they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present in
> the
> > > past release already.
> > > 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between
> 1.12.1
> > > and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from 1.9.3
> to
> > > 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
> > >
> > > Piotrek
> > >
> > > pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hey Roman,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for preparing RC1!
> > > >
> > > > +1 from my side.
> > > >
> > > > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
> > > > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
> > > > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
> > > > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
> > > > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink
> > > cluster,
> > > > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
> > > suspicious
> > > > output
> > > > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the binary
> > > release
> > > > as well
> > > > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an Apache
> > > > License file and a NOTICE file are included
> > > > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release (Flink
> > > > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double
> > > confirm
> > > > this).
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Yuan
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > > > 1.12.2,
> > > > > as follows:
> > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> releases
> > to
> > > > be
> > > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> with
> > > > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
> > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > > > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
> > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > announcement
> > > > > blog post [6].
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Roman
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
> > > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
> > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > [4]
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
> > > > > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
> > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
- Checked the diff between 1.12.1 and 1.12.2: OK (
https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.12.1...release-1.12.2-rc1)
- jackson version has been bumped to 2.10.5.1 through FLINK-21020 and all
NOTICE files updated correctly
- beanutils version has been bumped to 1.9.4 through FLINK-21123 and all
NOTICE files updated correctly
- testcontainer version has been bumped to 1.15.1 through FLINK-21277 and
no NOTICE files impact
- japicmp version has been bumped to 1.12.1 and no NOTICE files impact
- Checked release notes: OK
- Checked sums and signatures: OK
- Maven clean install from source: OK
- Checked the jars in the staging repo: OK
- Checked binary archive: OK
- Approved the website updates (left some notes in PR)
Thanks a lot for putting the RC together!
Best Regards,
Yu
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - verified checksums & signatures
> - reviewed website PR
> - build from source
> - run example jobs
> - standalone session & yarn per-job
> - jobs work as expected
> - ui & logs look good
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <pn...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
> >
> > +1 from my side
> >
> > 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues and I
> can
> > confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last couple of
> > weeks.
> > 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are two
> > blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being merged
> and
> > they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present in the
> > past release already.
> > 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between 1.12.1
> > and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from 1.9.3 to
> > 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
> >
> > Piotrek
> >
> > pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hey Roman,
> > >
> > > Thanks for preparing RC1!
> > >
> > > +1 from my side.
> > >
> > > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
> > > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
> > > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
> > > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
> > > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink
> > cluster,
> > > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
> > suspicious
> > > output
> > > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the binary
> > release
> > > as well
> > > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an Apache
> > > License file and a NOTICE file are included
> > > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release (Flink
> > > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double
> > confirm
> > > this).
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Yuan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > > 1.12.2,
> > > > as follows:
> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> to
> > > be
> > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
> > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> announcement
> > > > blog post [6].
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Roman
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
> > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
> > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > [4]
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
> > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
> > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
- verified checksums & signatures
- reviewed website PR
- build from source
- run example jobs
- standalone session & yarn per-job
- jobs work as expected
- ui & logs look good
Thank you~
Xintong Song
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM Piotr Nowojski <pn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
>
> +1 from my side
>
> 1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues and I can
> confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last couple of
> weeks.
> 2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are two
> blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being merged and
> they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present in the
> past release already.
> 3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between 1.12.1
> and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from 1.9.3 to
> 1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
>
> Piotrek
>
> pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Hey Roman,
> >
> > Thanks for preparing RC1!
> >
> > +1 from my side.
> >
> > 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
> > sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
> > 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
> > 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
> > 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink
> cluster,
> > and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without
> suspicious
> > output
> > 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the binary
> release
> > as well
> > 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an Apache
> > License file and a NOTICE file are included
> > 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release (Flink
> > 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double
> confirm
> > this).
> >
> > Best
> > Yuan
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > 1.12.2,
> > > as follows:
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > >
> > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
> > be
> > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
> > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> > > blog post [6].
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Roman
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
> > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
> > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > [4]
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
> > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Piotr Nowojski <pn...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Thanks for preparing this release candidate.
+1 from my side
1. I was monitoring recent builds for Unaligned Checkpoint issues and I can
confirm that it seems we don't have any failures in the last couple of
weeks.
2. There are no tickets with fix version set to 1.12.2. There are two
blocker bugs for 1.12.3, but they are still quite far from being merged and
they shouldn't block the 1.12.2 release, as they have been present in the
past release already.
3. I double confirmed that there are no dependency changes between 1.12.1
and 1.12.2-RC1, apart of the upgrade of `commons-beanutils` from 1.9.3 to
1.9.4, which had and maintained Apache 2.0 license.
Piotrek
pt., 19 lut 2021 o 10:24 Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Hey Roman,
>
> Thanks for preparing RC1!
>
> +1 from my side.
>
> 1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
> sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
> 2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
> 3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
> 4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink cluster,
> and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without suspicious
> output
> 5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the binary release
> as well
> 6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an Apache
> License file and a NOTICE file are included
> 7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release (Flink
> 1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double confirm
> this).
>
> Best
> Yuan
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> 1.12.2,
> > as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
> be
> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> > blog post [6].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Roman
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > [4]
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #1
Posted by Yuan Mei <yu...@gmail.com>.
Hey Roman,
Thanks for preparing RC1!
+1 from my side.
1. Run-through UnalignedCheckpointITCase for 800+ rounds to make
sure UnalignedCheckpoint is stable
2. Verified Checksums and GPG Signature
3. Verified that the source archives do not contain any binaries
4. Successfully Built the source with Maven, started a local Flink cluster,
and ran the streaming WordCount example with WebMonitor without suspicious
output
5. Successfully ran the streaming WordCount example with the binary release
as well
6. Checked for source and binary release to make sure both an Apache
License file and a NOTICE file are included
7. Manually check all pom file changes since the last release (Flink
1.12.1); no obvious license problem for me (Need someone to double confirm
this).
Best
Yuan
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:25 AM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.12.2,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint 0D545F264D2DFDEBFD4E038F97B4625E2FCF517C [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-1.12.2-rc1" [5],
> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> blog post [6].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
>
> Regards,
> Roman
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12349502&projectId=12315522
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.2-rc1/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1413/
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.2-rc1
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/418
>