You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com> on 2014/06/02 20:54:22 UTC
Re: 0.19.0 Testing
The target of the end of this week is nice because we can have the new
release out by the start of dockercon. I will make sure this is tested in a
production environment at least at Twitter before calling the vote. Would
appreciate others pitching in as well.
If there is anyone that would like to have more time to vet this release
please chime in! For External Containerizer related bugs, I would prefer to
follow up with 0.19.x bug fix releases through Till or Niklas.
Re: 0.19.0 Testing
Posted by Ian Downes <id...@twitter.com.INVALID>.
I just discovered a bug when using the recently added --slave_subsystems flag which erroneously tries to destroy the slave cgroup during recovery. It affects both the MesosContainerizer and the ExternalContainerizer. The fix should be considered for cherry picking onto 0.19.0. See MESOS-1449.
On Jun 2, 2014, at 11:54 AM, Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The target of the end of this week is nice because we can have the new
> release out by the start of dockercon. I will make sure this is tested in a
> production environment at least at Twitter before calling the vote. Would
> appreciate others pitching in as well.
>
> If there is anyone that would like to have more time to vet this release
> please chime in! For External Containerizer related bugs, I would prefer to
> follow up with 0.19.x bug fix releases through Till or Niklas.
Re: 0.19.0 Testing
Posted by Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com>.
Tagging 0.19.0-rc3 with the following three trivial cherry-picks off master:
* 4feeb9e Ignore slave cgroup during isolator recovery.
* ff8f287 Fixed a segfault in libprocess.
* aa5d491 Updated CHANGELOG for 0.19.0.
Here's what it looks like off of rc2:
* 51e0475 (HEAD) Updated CHANGELOG for 0.19.0.
* 8dfabce Fixed a segfault in libprocess.
* 83e2459 Ignore slave cgroup during isolator recovery.
* 96ffd0a (tag: 0.19.0-rc2) Updated the upgrades document for 0.19.0.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> There's also a regression in libprocess that I'll get fixed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1455
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Tom Arnfeld <to...@duedil.com> wrote:
>
>> That's exciting! I'd also love if anyone could try out the Docker
>> Containerizer I've been working on...
>> https://github.com/duedil-ltd/mesos-docker-containerizer (The deimos
>> project from mesosphere isn't compatible with the EC release
>> candidate, or not any version I could find).
>>
>> I'm in the process of deploying it to a pre-production cluster here at
>> DueDil (pretty small scale though, 156cpus) to test it out.
>>
>> Looking forward to the release!
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>> > On 2 Jun 2014, at 19:55, Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The target of the end of this week is nice because we can have the new
>> > release out by the start of dockercon. I will make sure this is tested
>> in a
>> > production environment at least at Twitter before calling the vote.
>> Would
>> > appreciate others pitching in as well.
>> >
>> > If there is anyone that would like to have more time to vet this release
>> > please chime in! For External Containerizer related bugs, I would
>> prefer to
>> > follow up with 0.19.x bug fix releases through Till or Niklas.
>>
>
>
Re: 0.19.0 Testing
Posted by Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com>.
There's also a regression in libprocess that I'll get fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1455
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Tom Arnfeld <to...@duedil.com> wrote:
> That's exciting! I'd also love if anyone could try out the Docker
> Containerizer I've been working on...
> https://github.com/duedil-ltd/mesos-docker-containerizer (The deimos
> project from mesosphere isn't compatible with the EC release
> candidate, or not any version I could find).
>
> I'm in the process of deploying it to a pre-production cluster here at
> DueDil (pretty small scale though, 156cpus) to test it out.
>
> Looking forward to the release!
>
> Tom.
>
> > On 2 Jun 2014, at 19:55, Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The target of the end of this week is nice because we can have the new
> > release out by the start of dockercon. I will make sure this is tested
> in a
> > production environment at least at Twitter before calling the vote. Would
> > appreciate others pitching in as well.
> >
> > If there is anyone that would like to have more time to vet this release
> > please chime in! For External Containerizer related bugs, I would prefer
> to
> > follow up with 0.19.x bug fix releases through Till or Niklas.
>
Re: 0.19.0 Testing
Posted by Tom Arnfeld <to...@duedil.com>.
That's exciting! I'd also love if anyone could try out the Docker
Containerizer I've been working on...
https://github.com/duedil-ltd/mesos-docker-containerizer (The deimos
project from mesosphere isn't compatible with the EC release
candidate, or not any version I could find).
I'm in the process of deploying it to a pre-production cluster here at
DueDil (pretty small scale though, 156cpus) to test it out.
Looking forward to the release!
Tom.
> On 2 Jun 2014, at 19:55, Benjamin Mahler <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The target of the end of this week is nice because we can have the new
> release out by the start of dockercon. I will make sure this is tested in a
> production environment at least at Twitter before calling the vote. Would
> appreciate others pitching in as well.
>
> If there is anyone that would like to have more time to vet this release
> please chime in! For External Containerizer related bugs, I would prefer to
> follow up with 0.19.x bug fix releases through Till or Niklas.