You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Amogh Vasekar <am...@citrix.com> on 2013/07/23 02:17:26 UTC
Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Hi All,
I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in the
codebase :
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-elements/c
isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
httpclient-contribs jar
(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontrib31jar.htm
)
Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not included
instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
Thanks,
Amogh
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>.
No it's not.
I used to use commons-httpclient-contrib jar, it's separate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
>
> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> httpclient/commons-
> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509TrustMana
> ger.java
>
> --Alex
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > +1
> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> >
> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils
> > >(it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance.
> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Amogh
> > >
> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven
> > >>by lots of users.
> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in
> > >>>the codebase :
> > >>>
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
> > >>> elements/c
> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> > >>>
> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontr
> > ib31jar.
> > >>> htm
> > >>> )
> > >>>
> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Amogh
> > >>
> > >
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>.
No. I have checked in the patch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Right, that's what I thought. Frank, what were you saying you were waiting for?
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:38:36PM +0000, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The files are currently in : http://bit.ly/18Ae7zH
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amogh
> >
> > On 7/24/13 1:22 PM, "Chip Childers" <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I don't think you need to wait. I actually need the files in the
> > >repo to pick up on them anyway for the docs.
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > >> Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch
> > >> in
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM
> > >> > To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> >
> > >> > We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible,
> > >> > but
> > >>all external
> > >> > code and dependencies need to be accounted for.
> > >> >
> > >> > I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy.
> > >> > I'll
> > >>take a look at
> > >> > doing it shortly.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang
> > >> > <Fr...@citrix.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process
> > >> > > we
> > >>need
> > >> > > to go through
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> > >> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the
> > >> > > > file described
> > >> > > below.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the
> > >> > > > information
> > >> > > required?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > >> > > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > >> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > >> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > >> > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
> > >> > > > > > > jar
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this
> > >> > > > > > > disclaimer on the source website :
> > >> > > > > > > "Warning:
> > >> > > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be
> > >> > > > > > > of
> > >>"Alpha"
> > >> > > > quality!"
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years,
> > >> > > > > > > and thus
> > >> > > was skeptical.
> > >> > > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > Amogh
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang"
> > >> > > > > > > <Al...@citrix.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >Amogh,
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it
> > >> > > > > > > >seems to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added.
> > >>Can
> > >> > > > > > > >you check on if you can use this?
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > ><dependency>
> > >> > > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > >> > > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > >> > > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency>
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >--Alx
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > >> > > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > >> > > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
> > >> > > > > > > >> jar
> > >> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > >> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/comm
> > >> > > > > > > >> ons-
> > >> > > > > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > >> > > > > > > >>
> > >>httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea
> > >> > > > > > > >> syX5
> > >> > > > > > > >> 09Tr
> > >> > > > > > > >> us
> > >> > > > > > > >> tM
> > >> > > > > > > >> anager.java
> > >> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >> --Alex
> > >> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal
> > >> > > > > > > >> > [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > >> > > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > >> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of
> > >> > > > > > > >> > commons-httpclient-contrib
> > >>jar
> > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > >> > +1
> > >> > > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> > >> > > > > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
> > >> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >maven for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >this
> > >>package
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier
> > >> > > > > > > >>maintenance.
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >Amogh
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang"
> > >> > > > > > > >> > ><Fr...@citrix.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>it
> > >>has
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users.
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but
> > >>maintenance
> > >> > > effort.
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar
> > >>[mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> commons-httpclient-contrib
> > >>jar
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> found
> > >>this
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo
> > >> > > > > > > r
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> k-
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >>isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> sl
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>already a part of httpclient-contribs jar
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient
> > >> > > > > > > >>>con
> > >> > > > > > > >> tr
> > >> > > > > > > >> > ib31jar.
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> htm
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> )
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>the jar was not included instead (probably
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>since it is a contrib
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> >
> >
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Right, that's what I thought. Frank, what were you saying you were
waiting for?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:38:36PM +0000, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The files are currently in : http://bit.ly/18Ae7zH
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On 7/24/13 1:22 PM, "Chip Childers" <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:
>
> >I don't think you need to wait. I actually need the files in the repo
> >to pick up on them anyway for the docs.
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> >> Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch in
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM
> >> > To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> >
> >> > We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but
> >>all external
> >> > code and dependencies need to be accounted for.
> >> >
> >> > I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll
> >>take a look at
> >> > doing it shortly.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we
> >>need
> >> > > to go through
> >> > >
> >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> >> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file
> >> > > > described
> >> > > below.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information
> >> > > required?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> >> > > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> >> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> >> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> >> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> >> > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi Alex,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this
> >> > > > > > > disclaimer on the source website :
> >> > > > > > > "Warning:
> >> > > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of
> >>"Alpha"
> >> > > > quality!"
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and
> >> > > > > > > thus
> >> > > was skeptical.
> >> > > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > Amogh
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >Amogh,
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems
> >> > > > > > > >to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added.
> >>Can
> >> > > > > > > >you check on if you can use this?
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > ><dependency>
> >> > > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> >> > > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> >> > > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency>
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >--Alx
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> >> > > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> >> > > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> >> > > > > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >>httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea
> >> > > > > > > >> syX5
> >> > > > > > > >> 09Tr
> >> > > > > > > >> us
> >> > > > > > > >> tM
> >> > > > > > > >> anager.java
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> --Alex
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal
> >> > > > > > > >> > [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> >> > > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> >> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
> >>jar
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > +1
> >> > > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> >> > > > > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
> >> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven
> >> > > > > > > >> > >for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this
> >>package
> >> > > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc
> >> > > > > > > >> > >and ucs) for easier
> >> > > > > > > >>maintenance.
> >> > > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> >> > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > > >> > >Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > >> > >Amogh
> >> > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang"
> >> > > > > > > >> > ><Fr...@citrix.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it
> >>has
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users.
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but
> >>maintenance
> >> > > effort.
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar
> >>[mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
> >>jar
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found
> >>this
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > >
> >>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo
> >> > > > > > > r
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> k-
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> sl
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>part of httpclient-contribs jar
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >
> >>>>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient
> >> > > > > > > >>>con
> >> > > > > > > >> tr
> >> > > > > > > >> > ib31jar.
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> htm
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> )
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>was not included instead (probably since it is a
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>contrib
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
>
>
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Amogh Vasekar <am...@citrix.com>.
Hi,
The files are currently in : http://bit.ly/18Ae7zH
Thanks,
Amogh
On 7/24/13 1:22 PM, "Chip Childers" <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:
>I don't think you need to wait. I actually need the files in the repo
>to pick up on them anyway for the docs.
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
>> Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch in
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM
>> > To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> >
>> > We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but
>>all external
>> > code and dependencies need to be accounted for.
>> >
>> > I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll
>>take a look at
>> > doing it shortly.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we
>>need
>> > > to go through
>> > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
>> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> > > >
>> > > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file
>> > > > described
>> > > below.
>> > > >
>> > > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information
>> > > required?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
>> > > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
>> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
>> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
>> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
>> > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Alex,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this
>> > > > > > > disclaimer on the source website :
>> > > > > > > "Warning:
>> > > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of
>>"Alpha"
>> > > > quality!"
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and
>> > > > > > > thus
>> > > was skeptical.
>> > > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Amogh
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com>
>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >Amogh,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems
>> > > > > > > >to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added.
>>Can
>> > > > > > > >you check on if you can use this?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ><dependency>
>> > > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
>> > > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
>> > > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >--Alx
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
>> > > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
>> > > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
>> > > > > > > >> httpclient/commons-
>> > > > > > > >>
>>httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea
>> > > > > > > >> syX5
>> > > > > > > >> 09Tr
>> > > > > > > >> us
>> > > > > > > >> tM
>> > > > > > > >> anager.java
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --Alex
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal
>> > > > > > > >> > [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
>> > > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
>> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
>>jar
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > +1
>> > > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
>> > > > > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven
>> > > > > > > >> > >for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this
>>package
>> > > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc
>> > > > > > > >> > >and ucs) for easier
>> > > > > > > >>maintenance.
>> > > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> > >Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > >Amogh
>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang"
>> > > > > > > >> > ><Fr...@citrix.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it
>>has
>> > > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users.
>> > > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but
>>maintenance
>> > > effort.
>> > > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar
>>[mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
>>jar
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found
>>this
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >
>>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo
>> > > > > > > r
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> k-
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>>isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> sl
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>part of httpclient-contribs jar
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >
>>>>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient
>> > > > > > > >>>con
>> > > > > > > >> tr
>> > > > > > > >> > ib31jar.
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> htm
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> )
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>was not included instead (probably since it is a
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>contrib
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>jar?)
>> > > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh
>> > > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
I don't think you need to wait. I actually need the files in the repo
to pick up on them anyway for the docs.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch in
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM
> > To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but all external
> > code and dependencies need to be accounted for.
> >
> > I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll take a look at
> > doing it shortly.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we need
> > > to go through
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >
> > > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file
> > > > described
> > > below.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information
> > > required?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this
> > > > > > > disclaimer on the source website :
> > > > > > > "Warning:
> > > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha"
> > > > quality!"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and
> > > > > > > thus
> > > was skeptical.
> > > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Amogh
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Amogh,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems
> > > > > > > >to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can
> > > > > > > >you check on if you can use this?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ><dependency>
> > > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >--Alx
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > > > > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > > > > > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea
> > > > > > > >> syX5
> > > > > > > >> 09Tr
> > > > > > > >> us
> > > > > > > >> tM
> > > > > > > >> anager.java
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --Alex
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal
> > > > > > > >> > [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > +1
> > > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> > > > > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven
> > > > > > > >> > >for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package
> > > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc
> > > > > > > >> > >and ucs) for easier
> > > > > > > >>maintenance.
> > > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > >Amogh
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang"
> > > > > > > >> > ><Fr...@citrix.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has
> > > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users.
> > > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance
> > > effort.
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this
> > > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo
> > > > > > > r
> > > > > > > >> > >>> k-
> > > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > > > > > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s
> > > > > > > >> > >>> sl
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a
> > > > > > > >> > >>>part of httpclient-contribs jar
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient
> > > > > > > >>>con
> > > > > > > >> tr
> > > > > > > >> > ib31jar.
> > > > > > > >> > >>> htm
> > > > > > > >> > >>> )
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar
> > > > > > > >> > >>>was not included instead (probably since it is a
> > > > > > > >> > >>>contrib
> > > > > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> > > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>.
Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch in
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM
> To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but all external
> code and dependencies need to be accounted for.
>
> I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll take a look at
> doing it shortly.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we need
> > to go through
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >
> > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file
> > > described
> > below.
> > >
> > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information
> > required?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >
> > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this
> > > > > > disclaimer on the source website :
> > > > > > "Warning:
> > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha"
> > > quality!"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and
> > > > > > thus
> > was skeptical.
> > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Amogh
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Amogh,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems
> > > > > > >to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can
> > > > > > >you check on if you can use this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > ><dependency>
> > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >--Alx
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > > > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > > > > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea
> > > > > > >> syX5
> > > > > > >> 09Tr
> > > > > > >> us
> > > > > > >> tM
> > > > > > >> anager.java
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Alex
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal
> > > > > > >> > [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > +1
> > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> > > > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven
> > > > > > >> > >for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package
> > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc
> > > > > > >> > >and ucs) for easier
> > > > > > >>maintenance.
> > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > >Amogh
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang"
> > > > > > >> > ><Fr...@citrix.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has
> > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users.
> > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance
> > effort.
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this
> > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo
> > > > > > r
> > > > > > >> > >>> k-
> > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > > > > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s
> > > > > > >> > >>> sl
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a
> > > > > > >> > >>>part of httpclient-contribs jar
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient
> > > > > > >>>con
> > > > > > >> tr
> > > > > > >> > ib31jar.
> > > > > > >> > >>> htm
> > > > > > >> > >>> )
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar
> > > > > > >> > >>>was not included instead (probably since it is a
> > > > > > >> > >>>contrib
> > > > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but all
external code and dependencies need to be accounted for.
I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll take
a look at doing it shortly.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we need to
> go through
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file described
> below.
> >
> > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information
> required?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >
> > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer
> > > > > on the source website :
> > > > > "Warning:
> > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha"
> > quality!"
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus
> was skeptical.
> > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Amogh
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Amogh,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > > > > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you
> > > > > >check on if you can use this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > ><dependency>
> > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version>
> > > > > ></dependency>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >--Alx
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > > > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX5
> > > > > >> 09Tr
> > > > > >> us
> > > > > >> tM
> > > > > >> anager.java
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --Alex
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > +1
> > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> > > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > > > > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> > > > > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs)
> > > > > >> > >for easier
> > > > > >>maintenance.
> > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >Amogh
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> > > > > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance
> effort.
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this
> > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > > > > >> > >>> k-
> > > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > > > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part
> > > > > >> > >>>of httpclient-contribs jar
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> > > > > >> tr
> > > > > >> > ib31jar.
> > > > > >> > >>> htm
> > > > > >> > >>> )
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was
> > > > > >> > >>>not included instead (probably since it is a contrib
> > > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>.
Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we need to go through
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file described below.
>
> Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information required?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >
> > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer
> > > > on the source website :
> > > > "Warning:
> > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha"
> quality!"
> > > >
> > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Amogh
> > > >
> > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Amogh,
> > > > >
> > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > > > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you
> > > > >check on if you can use this?
> > > > >
> > > > ><dependency>
> > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>0.3.11</version>
> > > > ></dependency>
> > > > >
> > > > >--Alx
> > > > >
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX5
> > > > >> 09Tr
> > > > >> us
> > > > >> tM
> > > > >> anager.java
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --Alex
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > +1
> > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> > > > >> > <am...@citrix.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > > > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> > > > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs)
> > > > >> > >for easier
> > > > >>maintenance.
> > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >Thanks,
> > > > >> > >Amogh
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> > > > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this
> > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > > > >> > >>> k-
> > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part
> > > > >> > >>>of httpclient-contribs jar
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> > > > >> tr
> > > > >> > ib31jar.
> > > > >> > >>> htm
> > > > >> > >>> )
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was
> > > > >> > >>>not included instead (probably since it is a contrib
> > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >
> >
> >
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file described
below.
Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information
required?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on
> > > the source website :
> > > "Warning:
> > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
> > >
> > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Amogh
> > >
> > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Amogh,
> > > >
> > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check
> > > >on if you can use this?
> > > >
> > > ><dependency>
> > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > > <version>0.3.11</version>
> > > ></dependency>
> > > >
> > > >--Alx
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >>
> > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > > >>
> > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Tr
> > > >> us
> > > >> tM
> > > >> anager.java
> > > >>
> > > >> --Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >> >
> > > >> > +1
> > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> > > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> > > >> > >easier
> > > >>maintenance.
> > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >Thanks,
> > > >> > >Amogh
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> > > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package
> > > >> > >>>in the codebase :
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > > >> > >>> k-
> > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> > > >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> >
> > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> > > >> tr
> > > >> > ib31jar.
> > > >> > >>> htm
> > > >> > >>> )
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> > > >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >
>
>
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>.
Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on
> > the source website :
> > "Warning:
> > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
> >
> > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amogh
> >
> > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Amogh,
> > >
> > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check
> > >on if you can use this?
> > >
> > ><dependency>
> > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > <version>0.3.11</version>
> > ></dependency>
> > >
> > >--Alx
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > >>
> > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > >> httpclient/commons-
> > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Tr
> > >> us
> > >> tM
> > >> anager.java
> > >>
> > >> --Alex
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> >
> > >> > +1
> > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> > >> > >easier
> > >>maintenance.
> > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Thanks,
> > >> > >Amogh
> > >> > >
> > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package
> > >> > >>>in the codebase :
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > >> > >>> k-
> > >> > >>> elements/c
> > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> > >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> > >> tr
> > >> > ib31jar.
> > >> > >>> htm
> > >> > >>> )
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> > >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > >> > >>> Amogh
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Koushik Das <ko...@citrix.com>.
For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on the source
> website :
> "Warning:
> not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
>
> I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >Amogh,
> >
> >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to compile
> >with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check on if you
> >can use this?
> >
> ><dependency>
> > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > <version>0.3.11</version>
> ></dependency>
> >
> >--Alx
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >>
> >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> >>
> >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> >> httpclient/commons-
> >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Trus
> >> tM
> >> anager.java
> >>
> >> --Alex
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> >> >
> >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> >> > >easier
> >>maintenance.
> >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks,
> >> > >Amogh
> >> > >
> >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Hi All,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in
> >> > >>>the codebase :
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> >> > >>> k-
> >> > >>> elements/c
> >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> >> tr
> >> > ib31jar.
> >> > >>> htm
> >> > >>> )
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Thanks,
> >> > >>> Amogh
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com>.
It's only two files and they were not that huge if I recall correctly from my quick glance.
--Alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:22 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> You can look at the code yourself and see if it's any different than what we
> copied.
>
> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.kuali.rice/rice-
> impl/1.0.3.1-
> BX/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasySSLProtocolSocketFact
> ory.java
>
> --Alex
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:17 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on
> > the source website :
> > "Warning:
> > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha"
> quality!"
> >
> > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amogh
> >
> > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Amogh,
> > >
> > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check
> > >on if you can use this?
> > >
> > ><dependency>
> > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > <version>0.3.11</version>
> > ></dependency>
> > >
> > >--Alx
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > >>
> > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > >> httpclient/commons-
> > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Tr
> > >> us
> > >> tM
> > >> anager.java
> > >>
> > >> --Alex
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> >
> > >> > +1
> > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> > >> > >easier
> > >>maintenance.
> > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Thanks,
> > >> > >Amogh
> > >> > >
> > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package
> > >> > >>>in the codebase :
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > >> > >>> k-
> > >> > >>> elements/c
> > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> > >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclie
> nt
> > con
> > >> tr
> > >> > ib31jar.
> > >> > >>> htm
> > >> > >>> )
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> > >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > >> > >>> Amogh
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com>.
You can look at the code yourself and see if it's any different than what we copied.
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.kuali.rice/rice-impl/1.0.3.1-BX/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory.java
--Alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:17 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on the source
> website :
> "Warning:
> not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
>
> I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >Amogh,
> >
> >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to compile
> >with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check on if you
> >can use this?
> >
> ><dependency>
> > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > <version>0.3.11</version>
> ></dependency>
> >
> >--Alx
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >>
> >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> >>
> >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> >> httpclient/commons-
> >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Trus
> >> tM
> >> anager.java
> >>
> >> --Alex
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> >> >
> >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> >> > >easier
> >>maintenance.
> >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks,
> >> > >Amogh
> >> > >
> >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Hi All,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in
> >> > >>>the codebase :
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> >> > >>> k-
> >> > >>> elements/c
> >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient
> con
> >> tr
> >> > ib31jar.
> >> > >>> htm
> >> > >>> )
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Thanks,
> >> > >>> Amogh
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Amogh Vasekar <am...@citrix.com>.
Hi Alex,
Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on the
source website :
"Warning:
not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was
skeptical.
Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
>Amogh,
>
>I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to compile
>with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check on if you can
>use this?
>
><dependency>
> <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> <version>0.3.11</version>
></dependency>
>
>--Alx
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>>
>> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
>>
>> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
>> httpclient/commons-
>> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509TrustM
>> anager.java
>>
>> --Alex
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> >
>> > +1
>> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
>> >
>> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
>> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils
>> > >(it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier
>>maintenance.
>> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
>> > >
>> > >Thanks,
>> > >Amogh
>> > >
>> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven
>> > >>by lots of users.
>> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
>> > >>
>> > >>> -----Original Message-----
>> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
>> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
>> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Hi All,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in
>> > >>>the codebase :
>> > >>>
>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
>> > >>> elements/c
>> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
>> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
>> > >>>
>> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
>> tr
>> > ib31jar.
>> > >>> htm
>> > >>> )
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
>> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks,
>> > >>> Amogh
>> > >>
>> > >
>
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com>.
Amogh,
I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check on if you can use this?
<dependency>
<groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
<artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
<version>0.3.11</version>
</dependency>
--Alx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
>
> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> httpclient/commons-
> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509TrustM
> anager.java
>
> --Alex
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > +1
> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> >
> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils
> > >(it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance.
> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Amogh
> > >
> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven
> > >>by lots of users.
> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in
> > >>>the codebase :
> > >>>
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
> > >>> elements/c
> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> > >>>
> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> tr
> > ib31jar.
> > >>> htm
> > >>> )
> > >>>
> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Amogh
> > >>
> > >
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com>.
Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-httpclient/commons-httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509TrustManager.java
--Alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> +1
> @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
>
> On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for contrib-ssl,
> >the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils (it is a
> >dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance.
> >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Amogh
> >
> >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven by
> >>lots of users.
> >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in the
> >>>codebase :
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
> >>> elements/c
> >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> >>>
> >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> >>>httpclient-contribs jar
> >>>
> >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontr
> ib31jar.
> >>> htm
> >>> )
> >>>
> >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not included
> >>>instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Amogh
> >>
> >
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
+1
@Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <am...@citrix.com> wrote:
>In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for contrib-ssl,
>the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils (it is a dependency
>for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance.
>Please let me know if this sounds good.
>
>Thanks,
>Amogh
>
>On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven by
>>lots of users.
>>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in the
>>>codebase :
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
>>> elements/c
>>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
>>>
>>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
>>>httpclient-contribs
>>> jar
>>>
>>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontrib31jar.
>>> htm
>>> )
>>>
>>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not included
>>>instead
>>> (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amogh
>>
>
Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Amogh Vasekar <am...@citrix.com>.
In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for contrib-ssl,
the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils (it is a dependency
for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance.
Please let me know if this sounds good.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Fr...@citrix.com> wrote:
>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven by
>lots of users.
>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in the
>>codebase :
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
>> elements/c
>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
>>
>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
>>httpclient-contribs
>> jar
>> (http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontrib31jar.
>> htm
>> )
>>
>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not included
>>instead
>> (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amogh
>
RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Posted by Frank Zhang <Fr...@citrix.com>.
I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven by lots of users.
Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in the codebase :
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
> elements/c
> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
>
> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of httpclient-contribs
> jar
> (http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontrib31jar.
> htm
> )
>
> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not included instead
> (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh