You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@synapse.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2006/05/31 12:53:54 UTC
[ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Dear Release Managers,
[Sorry for the cross post!]
Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc
members. We need it for legal purposes.
There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc
votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries
corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then
release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes
to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a
release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your
suggestions are welcome! Please post only to general@ws for discussion
to ensure maximum participation.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: synapse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: synapse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Please bump up the version # slightly and let's cut a new release.
thanks,
dims
On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dims,
>
> Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run
> the votes now?
>
> Jochen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 6/2/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name
> out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :)
I have no problem with splitting them when I find *that* there is
something growing. Within the last year, I didn't have that
impression.
Jochen
--
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the
majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
(Mark Twain)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> > Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming
> > strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility
> > within commons??
>
> It's defined as a set of utilities for XML handling, each of which
> which are too small for a separate project. Included are xs:dateTime
> parses and formatters, serializers, classes for namespace handling,
> and stuff like that. Give me a better name, although I wouldn't be too
> happy to change it after the project is around for 1 year. (And has
> always been since the foundation of the ws-commons.)
There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name
out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 6/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming
> strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility
> within commons??
It's defined as a set of utilities for XML handling, each of which
which are too small for a separate project. Included are xs:dateTime
parses and formatters, serializers, classes for namespace handling,
and stuff like that. Give me a better name, although I wouldn't be too
happy to change it after the project is around for 1 year. (And has
always been since the foundation of the ws-commons.)
Jochen
--
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the
majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
(Mark Twain)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC
folks
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming
strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility
within commons??
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 08:34 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi, Dims,
>
> Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run
> the votes now?
>
> Jochen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC
folks
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Dims,
Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run
the votes now?
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
It's on our front page :)
http://ws.apache.org/
That's the problem. i want to reduce the # of votes. i think typically
in httpd pmc the release manager works evern w/o the first vote. so
technically there is only one vote.
-- dims
On 5/31/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Dims,
> Thanks for the reminder. Are there any releases that need to take steps
> to correct this?
>
> Is there a list of WS PMC members somewhere? I know that you always do
> "+1 (binding)", but I don't think everyone always does this.
>
> Regarding the release process I have tended to call a vote, tag, publish
> a release, vet it with people, then announce if everyone OKs. If we
> require a tag wouldn't that require two votes? One to say - "do you want
> to do a release?" And then another to say "how about this tag?"
>
> Cheers,
> - Dan
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Dear Release Managers,
> >
> > [Sorry for the cross post!]
> >
> > Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc
> > members. We need it for legal purposes.
> >
> > There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc
> > votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries
> > corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then
> > release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes
> > to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a
> > release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your
> > suggestions are welcome! Please post only to general@ws for discussion
> > to ensure maximum participation.
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> (616) 971-2053
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://netzooid.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC
folks
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
Hi Dims,
Thanks for the reminder. Are there any releases that need to take steps
to correct this?
Is there a list of WS PMC members somewhere? I know that you always do
"+1 (binding)", but I don't think everyone always does this.
Regarding the release process I have tended to call a vote, tag, publish
a release, vet it with people, then announce if everyone OKs. If we
require a tag wouldn't that require two votes? One to say - "do you want
to do a release?" And then another to say "how about this tag?"
Cheers,
- Dan
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> [Sorry for the cross post!]
>
> Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc
> members. We need it for legal purposes.
>
> There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc
> votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries
> corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then
> release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes
> to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a
> release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your
> suggestions are welcome! Please post only to general@ws for discussion
> to ensure maximum participation.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
please ping paul and sanjiva and ask them to vote. they are on incubator pmc.
thx,
dims
On 6/20/06, John Kaputin <KA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> Dims,
> The Woden M5 vote returned only 1 binding +1 vote from an Incubator PMC
> member ... you.
>
> It has +1 votes from Jeremy Hughes and Tom Jordahl who are both WS PMC
> members. Are these binding for M5 or does Woden require binding votes from
> Incubator PMC members only. If so I'll post again for an Incubator vote.
>
> John Kaputin
>
>
>
>
> "Davanum
> Srinivas"
> <davanum@gmail.co To
> m> general@ws.apache.org
> cc
> 31/05/2006 11:53
> Subject
> [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding
> Please respond to +1's for a Release from PMC folks
> general@ws.apache
> .org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> [Sorry for the cross post!]
>
> Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc
> members. We need it for legal purposes.
>
> There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc
> votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries
> corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then
> release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes
> to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a
> release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your
> suggestions are welcome! Please post only to general@ws for discussion
> to ensure maximum participation.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by John Kaputin <KA...@uk.ibm.com>.
Dims,
The Woden M5 vote returned only 1 binding +1 vote from an Incubator PMC
member ... you.
It has +1 votes from Jeremy Hughes and Tom Jordahl who are both WS PMC
members. Are these binding for M5 or does Woden require binding votes from
Incubator PMC members only. If so I'll post again for an Incubator vote.
John Kaputin
"Davanum
Srinivas"
<davanum@gmail.co To
m> general@ws.apache.org
cc
31/05/2006 11:53
Subject
[ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding
Please respond to +1's for a Release from PMC folks
general@ws.apache
.org
Dear Release Managers,
[Sorry for the cross post!]
Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc
members. We need it for legal purposes.
There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc
votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries
corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then
release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes
to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a
release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your
suggestions are welcome! Please post only to general@ws for discussion
to ensure maximum participation.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org