You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by mlange <ml...@anwb.nl> on 2016/10/05 04:42:17 UTC
Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption
Created a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6453 about this
issue; please let me know if you need more information.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ReplicatedLevelDB-corruption-tp4716831p4717515.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption
Posted by Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>.
This is the first I'd heard of a replicated KahaDB implementation. I'd
heard of multi-KahaDB (mKahaDB), but that's multiple KahaDB databases on a
single broker (split by destination) rather than replicated. Maybe someone
else can provide more info...
On Oct 5, 2016 1:51 AM, "mlange" <ml...@anwb.nl> wrote:
> thanks for providing a good idea of what to expect; yet I think it's good
> to
> be aware of this.
> I did notice upon searching that there has been done some work to get
> Kahadb
> replicating; is that completely abandoned or is it still something that
> might get implemented (in a somewhat near future) I think it's a great idea
> to have the database replicating, to reduce the added complexity of shared
> storage (which may itself fail, so needs to have it's own fault tolerance)
>
> I'll explore what other options are available and work well.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ReplicatedLevelDB-corruption-tp4716831p4717517.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption
Posted by mlange <ml...@anwb.nl>.
thanks for providing a good idea of what to expect; yet I think it's good to
be aware of this.
I did notice upon searching that there has been done some work to get Kahadb
replicating; is that completely abandoned or is it still something that
might get implemented (in a somewhat near future) I think it's a great idea
to have the database replicating, to reduce the added complexity of shared
storage (which may itself fail, so needs to have it's own fault tolerance)
I'll explore what other options are available and work well.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ReplicatedLevelDB-corruption-tp4716831p4717517.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption
Posted by Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>.
Thank you. Unfortunately there's currently no LevelDB expert active on
this mailing list, so most LevelDB questions with any degree of complexity
go unanswered.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM, mlange <ml...@anwb.nl> wrote:
> Created a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6453 about this
> issue; please let me know if you need more information.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ReplicatedLevelDB-corruption-tp4716831p4717515.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>