You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Pascal Schumacher <pa...@gmx.net> on 2016/01/05 08:34:01 UTC

Regarding Groovy Bundling - Groovy now a TLP

Hello everybody,

there were some conversations on the mailing list regarding bundling 
Apache Groovy into JMeter. As far as I remember a decision was postponed 
until Groovy leaves the Incubator. In the Apache Board meeting on 18 
November it was decided to establish Groovy as a top level project (see: 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-groovy-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3DBz-tiTTYHiPc8vY26CopLm3pPy_LADvvFh4vjVs%3Dosw%40mail.gmail.com%3E). 
(For some reason the board meeting minutes are still not published at 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html)

Cheers,
Pascal

Re: Regarding Groovy Bundling - Groovy now a TLP

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

There is as yet only an incubating release.

I think we need to wait for an official ASF release.

On 2 February 2016 at 22:51, Philippe Mouawad
<ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
> Any thoughts on that ?
> Thx
>
> On Wednesday, January 13, 2016, Pascal Schumacher <pa...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Am 13.01.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>
>>> @Pascal, as we now target java7 , what bundle should we use if this is
>>> agreed on by other team members ?
>>>
>> With Java 7 you could use the groovy indy (invoke dynamic) bundle, but
>> (early) java 7 JREs have lots of invoke dynamic related bugs. So it's best
>> to use the classic bundle.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pascal
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Regarding Groovy Bundling - Groovy now a TLP

Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.

Hi Team,
Any thoughts on that ?
Thx

On Wednesday, January 13, 2016, Pascal Schumacher <pa...@gmx.net>
wrote:

> Am 13.01.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>
>> @Pascal, as we now target java7 , what bundle should we use if this is
>> agreed on by other team members ?
>>
> With Java 7 you could use the groovy indy (invoke dynamic) bundle, but
> (early) java 7 JREs have lots of invoke dynamic related bugs. So it's best
> to use the classic bundle.
>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Regarding Groovy Bundling - Groovy now a TLP

Posted by Pascal Schumacher <pa...@gmx.net>.

Am 13.01.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> @Pascal, as we now target java7 , what bundle should we use if this is
> agreed on by other team members ?
With Java 7 you could use the groovy indy (invoke dynamic) bundle, but 
(early) java 7 JREs have lots of invoke dynamic related bugs. So it's 
best to use the classic bundle.

Cheers,
Pascal

Re: Regarding Groovy Bundling - Groovy now a TLP

Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.

Hi,
+1 for me:
- It will make efficient and up to date scripting native
- it is easier for beginers (nothing to do)
- Jmeter upgrade is made easier for users

@Pascal, as we now target java7 , what bundle should we use if this is
agreed on by other team members ?

Thanks

On Tuesday, January 5, 2016, Pascal Schumacher <pa...@gmx.net>
wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> there were some conversations on the mailing list regarding bundling
> Apache Groovy into JMeter. As far as I remember a decision was postponed
> until Groovy leaves the Incubator. In the Apache Board meeting on 18
> November it was decided to establish Groovy as a top level project (see:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-groovy-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3DBz-tiTTYHiPc8vY26CopLm3pPy_LADvvFh4vjVs%3Dosw%40mail.gmail.com%3E).
> (For some reason the board meeting minutes are still not published at
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html)
>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.